Copenhagen In Robert King's A Play Of Uncertain Ideas

Improved Essays
Mark Frayn’s Copenhagen takes us on an historical sleuth adventure that is performed by the ghosts of Danish physicist Niels Bohr, his colleague and “adopted son” Werner Heisenberg, and Bohr’s wife Margrethe. Heisenberg was an overall boyish companion of Bohr who would go on long walks and talk physics to. However, the mystery is when Heisenberg visited the Bohrs in Copenhagen in 1941. The play explores the meeting and discusses different topics, such as building atomic bombs, escaping Nazi rule, and physics. It is Heisenberg who addresses this mystery. “Everyone understands uncertainty. Or thinks he does. No one understands my trip to Copenhagen. Time and time again I’ve explained it. To Bohr himself, and Margrethe. To interrogators and intelligence officers…The more I’ve explained, the deeper the uncertainty has become.” (Frayn 4) This is an interesting approach of how Frayn uses Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle as a way of introducing the idea that the more accurate information a person finds, …show more content…
” In this quotation, King defines Heisenberg’s uncertainly principle and acknowledges that Frayn used Heisenberg’s principle while writing Copenhagen and shows evidence of the principle being stated and used in the play via actual character

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Now the reader doesn’t know what to think and questions what Barry is saying. As the reader is confused Barry rebuilds his credibility, as a scientific author, by quoting great French physiologist Claude Bernard and references to awarded scientist Albert Einstein. Now that the reader has been told even professional, famous, scientist rely on uncertainty they can trust what is going to be written throughout the rest of the passage. In the succeeding paragraphs Barry continues to explain to the reader uncertainty and why one should question everything through the use of imagery and extended metaphors. Within the first few sentences, Barry constructs a strong image of how scientists and uncertainty interact.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As a child, I worshipped the invincible heroes in movies who got whatever they wanted, and I aspired to be like them. Although in real life, their clever and well thought out schemes would not be easy to implement or even devise, simply presenting an effective argument may be enough to manipulate an audience. To do so, the author must consider maintaining a connection with the audience, who may potentially disapprove of the argument or even find it offensive. To begin an argument, one can use a humble and frank tone towards the audience to state his purpose. He should take care not to use extreme or harsh diction or immediately present radical ideas.…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Secondly, an important line-of-thought follows directly: is there is any sort of underlying truth at all. The authors note that although there are thought to be “fundamental constants” of the/our universe, there is no way to know if the mass of the electron or Planck’s constant have always been the same or will necessarily be in the future (p268). These concerns, although perhaps extreme in the cases just mentioned, fit within the dialectic mindset as all perceived constants must be examined, or at least first considered, as variables. A more subtle question along the same lines asks if the measurement is measuring something only very specifically true or more generally applicable. In order to estimate the applicability of an experimental result to a broader context, one needs to establish a proposed mechanistic model.…

    • 2036 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the world of research, “a single step can take one off a cliff,” meaning one seemingly small mistake can lead to disaster. In a split second everything one is reaching for and working towards can come crashing down, leaving the researcher with no hope of ever retrieving it. Therefore, the uncertainty of the path taken while conducting scientific research is evident due to the precision and attention it requires. Barry also argues that “even the least ambiguous [scientists] deal with the unknown,” implying that there is no way you can avoid dealing with the mystery and risk that is engrained in the field, leading to the conclusion that uncertainty in science is inevitable. In addition, the passage also compares conducting scientific research is like looking “through the looking glass into a world that seems entirely different.”…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Werner Heisenberg, a german physicist, discovered that it’s rather impossible to predict the exact position and momentum of a particle due to the randomness and uncertainty. But the human knowledge of every particle in the universe remains very limited,…

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Abraham Pais’s article, “What Happened in Copenhagen?: A Physicist's View and the Playwright's Response,” Pais argues the historical accuracy of Michael Frayn’s 1998 play, Copenhagen. Frayn’s play depicts a meeting that took place in 1941 between prominent physicist Niels Bohr and Werner Heisenberg. The play takes place is the Nazi occupied Denmark, and sheds light on the political issues both men are facing. Following Pais’s dispute regarding small details of the play, Frayn then gives his response to Pais’s argument.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In Hamlet, there’s interest classic story as tradition playing stories that Shakespeare wrote. Maybe in the modern time, people won’t scary for classic story as compare to the past time. Then the place where's the place take in platform before the castle during the guard’s on duty at night. I think the guards tried to figure out who's the ghost as if that place have a horror story. The mood of Act 1, Scene 1 was horror and mystery.…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Shelly In Frankenstein

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Life is an experiment. From day to day, people attempt to change the way they are living, trying to figure out what brings them happiness. Mary Shelley, author of the 1818 novel Frankenstein, exposes her personal life through the character of the creature. Through a psychoanalytic lens, Shelley reveals her fear of science and the direction of scientific advancements. Within this time period, society’s morals are in question.…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The scientists in the novels are a reflection of Stoker and Shelly interpretation of the conflicting ideals. The conflicting ideological clash has set similarities and differences between the acting scientists of the novels, which in turn…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When a group of actors visit Ellsinore, Hamlet decides to re-act the story of the Ghost, and show it in to King Claudius. The reason behind that is to see the reaction of the King, and if there is any then he is no doubt guilty. This is one of the few most important evidences of the inward conflict, as Hamlet did so to not reveal him of knowing about the truth. What is…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Just as with Newton and motion or Einstein and relativity, when the name Werner Heisenberg is brought up in academic discussion it is synonymous with uncertainty due to his contributions towards quantum mechanics and his uncertainty principle. While many are familiar with his equations and work in physics, many are not as aware of how his contributions and character had enormous consequences in the outcome of World War II. There are many small tactical decisions and results that had huge impacts on the success or failure of the German war effort, and Heisenberg was in a position of great influence towards what could have been a war dominating advantage. While the play Copenhagen, by Michael Frayn, is essentially about the great uncertainty surrounding what took place in 1941 in Copenhagen, it also demonstrates the implications of uncertainty with regards to Heisenberg’s character and…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Hamlet by Shakespeare, there are two central ideas. Those two central ideas are to not overthink a situation and to not let revenge overpower conscience. Throughout the play, each central idea develops the other. As well, Shakespeare’s use of conflict develops the central ideas. One central idea is to not overthink a situation.…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hamlet: A State of Mind Shakespeare’s Hamlet, is one of the most profoundly developed characters ever created in a fictional masterpiece. William Shakespeare, an English, sixteenth-century actor and playwright, captures audiences with his detailed attention to human feelings. These sentiments dramatically affect the heroes of his literary works. Even in modern times, one can relate on a personal level to each one of his characters in his dark comedy, The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is a common misconception that science and literature are opposed. The common belief held is that the two cannot coexist because scientists are too focused on science and authors are too focused on the humanities. However, there is much blending between the two, with many scientists becoming authors and many authors taking an appreciation to science. As evidence, Michael Frayn’s Copenhagen is a perfect example as to how the two can cohabitate the same plane of knowledge and work together in unison to create something more educational and entertaining. Copenhagen is a play written by Michael Frayn that highlights a meeting between two globally known physicists, Niels Bohr and Werner Heisenberg, in Bohr’s house in Copenhagen.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the play Hamlet, by Shakespeare, the character hamlet appears insane as he speaks in incomprehensible, baffling language. Hamlet 's ambiguous madness appears controlled at times, and at others he seems irreparably erratic. Despite the ambiguity of Hamlet 's lunacy, it is clear he uses his absurdity to gain an advantage over the king. Hamlet feigns madness in order to attain his objective of misleading Claudius and his attendants to believe he is mad to protect himself, and always remains in complete control of his psyche despite other character 's doubts.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays