Brooks argues that the use of cameras mounted on police officers called “Cop-Cams” will affect the relationship between the arbitrator and the convict. Not only is this incorrect by stating that the judiciary system has sentimental relationships with its offender but also that the system must worry about the comfortability of the offender. this sounds like you’re trying to sound smart but it really makes very little sense. Be straight forward and clear The moment a police officer handcuffs someone, shoves them to the ground or humiliates them in front of their peers by forcing them into a squad car they have been subjected to the judiciary system and have given up their rights of privacy how? you haven’t made this clear. In all reality there
