Most people want to have freedom to do whatever they would like to do, especially giving their opinions in public areas. A purpose of giving speech is to change audiences’ thoughts or provide information that people do not know or incite people to do something for benefits. People usually see a president of a country gives their speech in front of its citizens to inform situations and policy of a nation. Audiences also have to ponder what the president talks about. However, this kind of speech is verified by qualified officers who work for the government before information is given to audiences, the information is mostly a true story. On the other hand, free speech from an unknown person is a kind of speech that audiences must pay attention
…show more content…
Most people have a question why people need to have rights on free speech. Having free speech is to express people’s opinion and give information of everything even though that information can be proved or cannot be proved because there is no law to limit speakers’ ideas. The most popular way of giving speech is on the internet because it has no cost and a person who gives their speech can write anything on social media and websites. “The online users review process has never been totally open and honest, however. Fake reviews are rampant. Individuals and companies, and even public relations agencies hired specifically for this purpose, plant reviews that praise a company's products or services or that criticize a competitor's”( Goldsborough 1). From this quotation we can infer that freedom of speech on the internet is not a good idea. It is the easiest way to discredit someone by giving information that is not true on the internet, so free speech also has disadvantages to individuals or others, especially by anonymous …show more content…
A problem was about a political issue and it has started 12 years ago. The country used to have free speech in public areas, but now they do not have. In 2005, a group called People’s Alliance for Democracy (PAD) or Yellow-Shirt started giving free speech in Bangkok, where is the capital city of Thailand. Leaders of the PAD used free speech in public areas to incite people in order to protest the government of that period which was led by Thaksin Chinawat. The PAD gave the speech about the Thaksin government’s fraud. Unfortunately, the government did not respond to the protesters because there was no evidence to prove that Thaksin was guilty. They had to wait until the case was judged by the constitutional court, but the leaders of the PAD said they could not wait. The PAD tried every way to make the government interested to them, they gave speech to incite the protesters and moved the protesters to the airport in Bangkok. They tried to damage to property because the airport is the most important place which runs the economic system of Thailand. After no movement from the Thaksin’s government, the Thai military seized power from Thaksin and governed the country by themselves. The next three years another problem happened again, Abhisit Vejjajiva, who was a prime minister of Thailand during 2008 to 2010, he was chosen to serve the country by the council not from citizens. A group of people who supports Thaksin
Most people have a question why people need to have rights on free speech. Having free speech is to express people’s opinion and give information of everything even though that information can be proved or cannot be proved because there is no law to limit speakers’ ideas. The most popular way of giving speech is on the internet because it has no cost and a person who gives their speech can write anything on social media and websites. “The online users review process has never been totally open and honest, however. Fake reviews are rampant. Individuals and companies, and even public relations agencies hired specifically for this purpose, plant reviews that praise a company's products or services or that criticize a competitor's”( Goldsborough 1). From this quotation we can infer that freedom of speech on the internet is not a good idea. It is the easiest way to discredit someone by giving information that is not true on the internet, so free speech also has disadvantages to individuals or others, especially by anonymous …show more content…
A problem was about a political issue and it has started 12 years ago. The country used to have free speech in public areas, but now they do not have. In 2005, a group called People’s Alliance for Democracy (PAD) or Yellow-Shirt started giving free speech in Bangkok, where is the capital city of Thailand. Leaders of the PAD used free speech in public areas to incite people in order to protest the government of that period which was led by Thaksin Chinawat. The PAD gave the speech about the Thaksin government’s fraud. Unfortunately, the government did not respond to the protesters because there was no evidence to prove that Thaksin was guilty. They had to wait until the case was judged by the constitutional court, but the leaders of the PAD said they could not wait. The PAD tried every way to make the government interested to them, they gave speech to incite the protesters and moved the protesters to the airport in Bangkok. They tried to damage to property because the airport is the most important place which runs the economic system of Thailand. After no movement from the Thaksin’s government, the Thai military seized power from Thaksin and governed the country by themselves. The next three years another problem happened again, Abhisit Vejjajiva, who was a prime minister of Thailand during 2008 to 2010, he was chosen to serve the country by the council not from citizens. A group of people who supports Thaksin