About six million pets are housed in shelters each year in the United States of America, but only about two million are adopted. There are several types of shelters that animals reside in, with positives and negatives of their own kind for each. The most common of these different types of shelters are Kill Shelters and “No-Kill” Shelters, both of which take part in an ongoing and very pressing controversial topic. Kill Shelters, frequently called Open Admission Shelters, are shelters that kill animals after keeping them for a while to make room for other animals. “No-Kill” Shelters, known otherwise as Limited Admission Shelters, do not kill animals regardless of the amount of time they have resided in the shelter. The purpose of this paper is to compare and contrast Kill and “No-Kill” Shelters by showing supportive evidence for each type of shelter.
There are multiple positive aspects to Kill Shelters. Firstly, Kill Shelters are open to all animals, unlike “No-Kill” Shelters. …show more content…
Firstly, “No-Kill” Shelters do not kill animals, but instead give them a place to stay. Animals that would have been killed in Kill Shelters have a chance to become adopted and live a healthy and safe life by being cared for by their new owners. Secondly, multiple “No-Kill” Shelters do what they can to make sure all of the animals are taken care of when they are in the shelters. This includes foster care for sick and injured animals and rehabilitation for animals that need it. Finally, “No-Kill” Shelters promote the growth of animal welfare and pet adoption organizations. They provide a foundation for these organizations to expand on. Several of these organizations include the San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (San Francisco SPCA), the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA), and the Best Friends Animal Society