Controversial Mascots- Argument Essay
Sports mascots and what they represent are part of American heritage. Many mascots in sports today are seen as politically wrong and offensive, but that is not the case. They are used to promote fun and team spirit and most are viewed respectably
Any mascot can be controversial. An animal mascot can be seen offensive in the way it is displayed, but people don’t demand that they be changed. This is because Americans care more about accidentally offending someone than they do about their history and culture. “The most absurd aspect of this politically correct ruckus is that non-native Americans are lecturing Native Americans on what should offend them” (Hyman).This is from an article about the University of North Dakota and their mascot. The Fighting Sioux have been told that there name is racial and crude by the board of education and other representatives. But, they haven’t discussed this with their origin, the Sioux tribe, who wants them to keep the name. They see it as an honor to be represented by the people of their town. According to Playboy magazine,”90 percent of Native Americans who were polled responded they were not offended by the Redskins mascot” (Hyman). …show more content…
While some can be displayed as crude and have offensive chants, most do not. The Braves, for example are displayed as strong and courageous. They have a great mascot that shows the strength of the team. Some people might see a few of their cheers to be offensive, but they are done out of good-natured fun and team spirit (Kimberlin). Getting rid of a team's mascot can affect their team spirit, fans, and overall playing. The logos used by teams are also viewed as controversial. They are just animated to draw people in and create a fun atmosphere, like all
Sports mascots and what they represent are part of American heritage. Many mascots in sports today are seen as politically wrong and offensive, but that is not the case. They are used to promote fun and team spirit and most are viewed respectably
Any mascot can be controversial. An animal mascot can be seen offensive in the way it is displayed, but people don’t demand that they be changed. This is because Americans care more about accidentally offending someone than they do about their history and culture. “The most absurd aspect of this politically correct ruckus is that non-native Americans are lecturing Native Americans on what should offend them” (Hyman).This is from an article about the University of North Dakota and their mascot. The Fighting Sioux have been told that there name is racial and crude by the board of education and other representatives. But, they haven’t discussed this with their origin, the Sioux tribe, who wants them to keep the name. They see it as an honor to be represented by the people of their town. According to Playboy magazine,”90 percent of Native Americans who were polled responded they were not offended by the Redskins mascot” (Hyman). …show more content…
While some can be displayed as crude and have offensive chants, most do not. The Braves, for example are displayed as strong and courageous. They have a great mascot that shows the strength of the team. Some people might see a few of their cheers to be offensive, but they are done out of good-natured fun and team spirit (Kimberlin). Getting rid of a team's mascot can affect their team spirit, fans, and overall playing. The logos used by teams are also viewed as controversial. They are just animated to draw people in and create a fun atmosphere, like all