Arguments Against Gun Control Laws In The United States

Improved Essays
Gun Control There is no justification for the government to apply restrictions on a citizen who posses a firearm.It is deceptive of government to expect us to believe that criminals will follow gun control laws. There seems to be an underlying motive for gun control laws. Just take one moment to think about it, people would be far more easy to control if they had no means of defence. A minority of public policy debates have been as controlled by misinformation and emotion as the one of gun control. Banning firearms to reduce crime rates makes as much sense as banning alcohol consumption to reduce intoxicated driving. It is true that countless evidence shows when civilian’s own guns that it can, and will lower crime rates drastically. The …show more content…
Opposing this Gun control supporters,(people who favor additional legal restrictions on availability of guns or people who want to ban certain types of guns, argue that the more guns there are, that more crime will happen. There is no simple statistical relationship between homicide and gun ownership or other violent crimes. During the first thirty years of this century, U.S. handgun ownership per capita remained steady, but homicide rates rose greatly by 100%. Coincidentally, between the years of 1937 and 1963, handgun ownership rose dramtically by 250 percent, and as a result the homicide rates fell by 35 percent (Lic Phil). Switzerland, through its military system, issues out both fully automatic assault rifles and handguns to all capable adult males and makes it mandatory for them to store their weapons at home. Further more, civilian rifle purchases are basically unregulated, and handguns are available to any adult without a mental defect or criminal record. Nevertheless, Switzerland experiences much less crime per capita than america, and almost none armed crimes (Mcclurg ). We should most definitely look beyond guns as the reason for violence. The fact is, crime and violence will be permanently linked to the collapsing of educational standards, increasing rebellious acts and a diminishing society morals …show more content…
Weaver Also said ammunition magazines should not be limited, and said it won 't stop criminals as they will simply steal them or buy them out of state. He won’t disregard new laws but also he won’t be “ordering gun magazine round ups”(Fox News). On another standpoint Nationwide people are being affected by gun violence. Something has to be done, for as the dangerous places are getting worse and safe places are becoming unsafe. "If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquillity of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen" (Adams). I could not have said it better myself. By allowing the government to infringe on our right to keep and bear arms, we are leading the future to the abolishment of all our civil rights and the destruction of the Constitution of the United States of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    First, the factual context” The US has a homicide rate of 4.8 per 100,000, which is much higher than that of most Western European countries (1.1 for France, 1.0 for Australia), but the relationship between gun regulation and homicides is in no way straightforward. Gun-loving Switzerland has the lower rate of homicides than do more tightly regulated countries like the United Kingdom and Sweden. Cuba, a policed state, having very strict gun laws has a higher homicide rate than does the United States at 5.0 per…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control In Mexico

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Though gun control is a necessary thing, many are against stricter gun control laws. Those opposed to stricter gun control laws would state that gun control would have no effect on reducing crime (Gottieb 1991). However, according to the Huffington Post, which states that with “Higher gun violence tend to have much less stringent gun laws” (States 2013). Having gun laws that put severe restrictions on guns are unhelpful and impractical. The government can make it almost impossible to obtain a…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Swiss Way-Gun Control

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Swiss Way- Gun Control Theodore Roosevelt once said, “We should encourage rifle practice among school boys, and indeed, among all classes. The first step in the direction of preparation to avert war if possible, and to be fit for war, if it should come, is to teach men to shoot.” One of the biggest debates in the United States at the moment is whether or not there should be a tighter control on guns. If one were to look at the statistics around the world, the country that seems to have one of the lowest crime rates(with its percentage of gun ownership) is Switzerland.…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One example Russia, the murder rate in Russia is higher than that of the United States. While in the other hand, many nations in Europe which do not have gun laws are placed in the top ten list with the lowest crime rates in the world. Switzerland being the country with the lowest murder rate, has 216 police officers per 100,000 citizens making them the definition of safe-living truly. This proves that gun ownership instead of increasing crimes, actually reduces crime rates by the…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Society has been split into two over whether or not guns should be banned, but there needs to be a solution where both parties can be happy. Anti-gun advocates present reasoning why guns should be banned. McMahan’s main two arguments of why guns should be banned: one, guns in the community creates a more dangerous environment; and two, the police have less of a power to protect citizens when society has guns (Shafer-Landau, The Ethical Life (EL) 390). McMahan explains that communities are not going to be free of crimes with more people carrying around guns, because criminals will be more prepared, efficient, and quicker to grab and shoot their target (Shafer-Landau, EL 392-392). People with guns will be safer than people without guns, because they do not have a gun to protect themselves.…

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The debates I have heard regarding gun control focus on a few main points. These are that our existing laws need to be improved to better restrict the availability of assault type weapons, placing limits on the capacity of ammunition magazines, ensuring that through background checks occur, enforcement of a waiting period to purchase guns…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Suicides Essay

    • 1548 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Between the years 2000 and 2013 the amount of deaths by guns in America exceeded the amount of deaths caused by AIDS, drugs, wars, and terrorism combined. Even more shocking than this statistic is how unique this issue is to the United States. In the United States there are 29.7 homicides for every 1 million people. Switzerland, with the second highest rate in the world, has only 7.7. It is not that Americans are just more violent individuals, in fact the US ranks far below first for crimes rates other than gun violence (Lopez).…

    • 1548 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the other hand, responsible gun laws do not infringe on the constitution and do not disarm those good citizens. Blek writes, “We must challenge and move beyond the mistaken belief that creating responsible gun laws in some manner offends our constitutional rights.” Guns have become too easily available and should not be allowed to those with mental illnesses or those with ill intentions such as criminals. However, America cannot allow itself to become disarmed and without protection, infringing upon the individual right, but must enact responsible gun laws for the good of the country and its future.…

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If you look at the facts, firearms are over 300 times more likely to stop crime, than to cause a crime. If guns were to be taken away from these citizens, murder rates would rise, and the chance to stop crime would drop immensely. In 2015, a tragic terrorist attack occurred in San Bernardino, California. Despite this states intense gun control, an attack was still carried out.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Every day five women are murdered due to gun violence in America. According to (Should More Gun Control Laws Be Enacted) “86% of women killed by firearms were in the U.S. and American women are 11.4 times more likely to be victims of a gun homicide”. Both Finland and Switzerland require criminal and mental health records and many more restrictions. In March 2016, a study found that in other countries, gun homicide rates in higher income countries were 23.3% higher in 2010. (Should More Gun Control Laws Be…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The right to bear arms has been topic of discussion among people since ancient times. Political theorist John Locke viewed possession of arms as a personal freedom one should abstain. The Second Amendments purpose and meaning has been a key controversy. The Amendment adopted in 1791, was constructed so each state maintained a militia, composed of everyday citizens who served as part time soldiers which were well regulated. People feared the federal government would use its standing army to go against its will on the states, the authors of the second amendment intended to protect the states militias’ right to bear arms.…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although this may be true, the Second Amendment has become the object of some study itself. Correlating with the predicament of whether it recognizes the right of each citizen to keep and bear arms. Opposing to, whether the right belongs solely to state governments and empowers each state to maintain a military force (Vandercoy, 2016). At the same time, it leaves the question unresolved of what the founders really had in mind when they conscripted this cutting edge declaration. With attention to that, the phenomenon has soared into heights beyond a meer debatable matter.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argumentative “You can have all the gun control laws in the country, but if you don’t enforce them, people are gonna find a way to protect themselves. We need to recognize that bad people are doing bad things with these weapons. It’s not the law-abiding citizens, it’s not the person who uses it as a hobby” (Steele). There are around 100,000 victims of gun violence each year (“Brady Campaign...”). Action needs to be taken so Americans don’t feel unprotected going into a public environment.…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That not only will not decrease the number of criminals have guns, but also decrease the number of law-abiding citizens have guns, which make law-abiding citizens lose ability of self – protection. The more important thing is that sources of crime is the people’s thoughts and desires. Each of the shootings the killers was the person who shot, not the gun itself. The Government cannot simply rudely to solve this problem by the way of the gun ban. In the article “Just Take Away Their Guns”, James Q. Wilson wrote that “Our goal should not be the disarming of law-abiding citizens.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Controlling guns cannot assist in any way in reducing the rate of crimes. Criminals will always devise other means of survival .they can even improvise guns or resolve to the use of more harmful and dangerous weapons. Having large numbers of criminals on the streets means that the problem is not yet over. The government should also consider offering jobs to majority of those on the streets. The number one reason of getting a person engaging in crime is due to lack of financial resources.…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays