Control: Exposing The Truth About Guns, By Glenn Beck

Improved Essays
Control: Exposing the Truth about Guns
In the book, “Control: Exposing the Truth about Guns” Glenn Beck expresses his position on the Second Amendment by using a tremendous amount of statistical data and facts about guns and gun violence. Beck is a well known conservative, radio host, author, television network producer, and entrepreneur who rigorously opposes gun control in America. In the United States, there are plenty of individuals who believe that there should be some sort of prevision on weapons especially military style rifles. Supporters of gun control note that the government can implement laws to control the distribution of guns without infringing upon citizens right to bear arms. Beck’s thesis is to inform his audience the importance of having guns in order to protect one’s freedom, liberty, and from becoming a victim of a gun related crime.
Beck uses a persuasive style of writing by providing his audience countless amounts of facts about guns and gun violence. The author firmly believes that gun control laws are part of
…show more content…
Controllist notes that citizens do not need semi-automatic weapons in their homes because they are essentially killing machines, which are necessary to own. In order to debunk this argument, Beck gives brief stories in which homeowners across the country have successfully defended their homes from multiple intruders. I believe that having these scenarios strengths Beck’s position because it taps into the audiences emotions and allow them to envision themselves in life threatening situations. Beck is thorough with supporting his thesis, but is extremely bias towards his position on gun control. Throughout the entire novel he successfully refutes all opposing arguments that have been presented by controllist in regards to mass shootings and gun control. Beck shifts his focus on why individuals commit mass shootings and how the individual should be blamed not

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Katrina Herrera Mrs. Clark AP English 3 08 February 2018 Argumentative Essay Final Draft: Gun Control Gun control is one of the most controversial topics in American politics. More than one-third of Americans in the United States own firearms in their households. It is estimated that more than thirty-thousand people are shot each year due to murders, accidents, police intervention, suicide attempts and suicide. Gun control laws are not strict enough for the safety of our society. The purchase and possession of firearms should be banned in order to prevent potential public shootings, protect the environment, and decrease suicide and death rates.…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He believes individuals should have the right to purchase and own a gun, but also believes there should be policies and restrictions along with the right. Lindgren then goes on to explain the history of gun control and how our current policies were developed. Because Lindgrens stance falls in the middle of the two sides of the argument, throughout the article he acknowledges the ups and downs of both sides. Lindgren shares, “I would not be surprised if reducing gun-free zones increased homicides and suicides overall, while it reduced the number of lives lost in mass murders.” (716) This is one of many instances where Lindgren shows how torn his opinion is on gun control.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    My rhetorical ecology’s primary goal is to articulate the many levels of statistical data surrounding gun control in the US. I start off the presentation with the Bill of Rights and immediately provide commentary from individuals who played a fundamental role in the foundation of the United States. Then, I state current gun control laws currently in place. From here on out, I expand on specific analytics: mass shootings, other deadlier killers, and total firearm violence. The audience this argument appeals to is people who react to gun control regulations after mass shootings occur.…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mass Shooting Summary

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It is chilling. The incidence of mass shootings in America has risen dramatically. Since 1949, there have been 32 single-day mass shootings and of those, 18 have occurred since 2000. The number of people slain is even more suggestive of this seeming epidemic: 307 of 480 people who were killed in all of the attacks, perished since 2000 (“Deadliest”). Murphy offers just one solution, that of gun control, without so much as a mention of any underlying issues that are manifesting in these attacks.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun control has been extremely controversial in society for years. In the essay “Just Take Away Their Guns,” James Q. Wilson argues his view on stricter gun control laws. He writes, “Legal restraints on the lawful purchase of guns will have little effect on the illegal use of guns” (Wilson, 1994, p.125). He backs up his statement with the statistics that 5/6 of handguns used in crimes are either stolen or purchased privately. With this being said, he displays that increasing legal restraints on purchasing guns will have little to no effect on the use of guns to commit crimes.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Annotated Bibliography: Gun Control Everyone has their opinion over Guns, many believe it’s ok to have guns but others disagree. But many have guns for protection, I understand people abuse the power on having guns and commit a crime. Many shootings have occurred this year and last year.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the founding fathers of the United States wrote the Constitution, they added the Bill of Rights which is a set of the first the ten amendments of to the Constitution. The second of these amendments, states that "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." (U.S Const. Amend II). Particularly, this amendment is interpreted in many ways; some pro gun-control groups say only militias are allowed to bear arms, and pro gun groups say that every citizen is allowed to bear arms.…

    • 1790 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rosenzweig’s main purpose of this argument is to express his personal feelings on gun control and explain how regulation is not the main issue when talking about gun control. He adopts a conservative tone for his main audience of people against heavy gun control. Paul Rosenzweig is a writer and a speaker that has a good reputation in cyber security and homeland security. Rosenzweig was a founder of his own business, a professional lecturer in Law at George Washington University,…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Laura Bolin Carroll is able to clearly persuade us of the importance of being able to have the skills of rhetorical analysis when being presented with rhetoric. In her text, “ Backpacks vs. Briefcases: Steps toward Rhetorical Analysis “, she relates to the audience by putting into words how we, as a society make quick analysis by making assumptions by appearance. You are quick to make conclusions about a person simply by how they present themselves. We have it engraved in our reasoning that a person’s appearance is a representation of their personality. As we continue to make these assumptions and conclusions, we begin to adjust to the amount of rhetoric information that is given to us through these encounters.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Russ Shafer-Landau provides us with an article by Jeff McMahan in order to give us an analytical argument on gun control. Jeff McMahan, in his article Why Gun Control Isn’t Enough, discusses why he believes guns should not simply be controlled in the United States, rather they should be banned. McMahan makes the case that gun ownership, in its entirety, is dangerous and illogical. Through several examples and through his own reasoning, McMahan hopes to convince the reader that the only way forward on the topic of ‘guns’ in the United States is to completely ban civilians from owning traditional firearms, from the ground up. Through my counter-argument, I intend to show that while McMahan’s argument is versed well on intent, it is mostly normative,…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun control is a topic that divides the opinions of the United States citizens and creates endless discussions that until now has not reached a conclusion. The United States has faced many mass shootings during the last years making the supporters of gun control want a reform even more. Guns are responsible for over thirty-three thousand deaths in the United States every year. The United States leads the world with more gun-related homicides and suicides than any other country, according to a 2016 study conducted by the American Journal of Medicine. (“Gun Control”).…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    With less than 5 percent of the world’s population, the United States holds about 35- 50 percent of the world’s civilian owned guns (Masters, 2016). In reviewing America’s history, this statistic may not seem so striking since guns have always played a major role in society. However, due to the recent events regarding gun violence and an increase in terrorism, the topic of gun control has become problematic for American. When discussing gun control there are mainly two views.…

    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Realizing that his audience includes liberals who know this, Cronin does not try to find any rare statistics that are in favor of firearms. Although he could have just avoided numbers altogether, he concedes that, “statistically speaking, a gun in the home represents a far greater danger to the inhabitants than to the intruder” (Cronin 20*). Although he is giving up some ground on his case, this confession shows readers that Cronin is not trying to fool anyone. He argues that the dilemma of gun ownership is not as much about what the stats says, but instead a decision that “comes from the gut” (Cronin 20*). By admitting that guns could potentially bring danger to his family, it makes the reader even more eager to hear his pro-gun…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Columnist Nicholas Kristof wrote an article titled “Our Blind Spot about Guns,” which was published in The New York Times in 2014. In the article’s context, he “argues that if guns and their owners were regulated in the same way that cars and their drivers are, thousands of lives could be saved each year” (Kristof 161). He incorporates multiple statistics in his essay, provides us with insights from the opposing side, and compares the issue of gun control to one that occurred a century ago: vehicle control. Just in the first two paragraphs, Kristof does not cease to use startling statistics that he is sure will grab our attention. He brings to light the issue of 1921 when vehicle regulations were non-existent which, therefore, contributed to the issue of high fatality rates.…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the essay, “Just Take Away Their Guns”, James Q. Wilson a Management and Policy professor at UCLA, argues that legally owned guns are not the problem, in fact the real problem lies with society ignoring the usage of illegal guns. The purpose of this essay is to convey to society that gun crimes can be stopped before a shot is fired, that it does not entitle a huge stack of forms at the local gun store. Wilson effectively argues that legally owned guns are necessary for citizens to protect themselves, reasonable police frisks should be in place to stop illegal gun use before the crime is committed and ultimately guns agitate the situation making crimes worse. The authors credibility and logical appeal are overall effective, in spite of the lack of emotional appeal or connection to the audience. Despite the absence of Pathos, the author conveys an adequate amount of logic, which carries the paper to an effective and persuasive conclusion.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays