Compare And Contrast A Four P's Of Marketing Versus The Value Approach

711 Words 3 Pages
Compare and Contrast a Four Ps of Marketing Versus the Value Approach
The four Ps (product, promotion, place, and price) are focused on two different sorts of approaches, the traditional marketing and value. Marketing has changed quite a bit since the four Ps were established in the 1950s. Therefore, the four Ps had to adapt to meet what today’s consumers and economy need.
The four Ps are a very easy process to follow. Product is what you are selling, promotion is how to portray the product to your consumers, place is where consumers can find the product, and price is what the consumer will have to pay for the product. The four Ps approach is fairly simple, but as the market changes the consumers are wanting more.
Today’s market is all about value. Everything we purchase we want to hold value. According to Tanner and Raymond define value as “the benefits buyers receive that meet their needs” (2013). The consumer place the value on each product. Now a days they are willing to spend a little more money so they are not inconvenienced when procuring the product. The value approach is made up of creating, communicating,
…show more content…
1. Products and administrations (making offerings). 2. Advancement. Correspondence. 3. Place. Getting the item to a time when the client can buy it (conveying). 4. Cost. The financial sum charged for the item (trade). On the off chance that the four Ps are the same as making, conveying, conveying, and trading, you may be asking why there was a change. The answer is that they are not precisely the same. Item, value, spot, and advancement are things. As being what is indicated, these words neglect to catch every one of the exercises of promoting. For instance, trading obliges instruments for an exchange, which comprise of more than basically a value or spot. Trading requires, in addition to other things, the exchange of proprietorship. (What Is

Related Documents