Compare And Contrast Democratic Party Vs Republican Party

Improved Essays
Assignment Two With the establishment of a powerful two-party political system in the United States, the Democrats and Republicans – there are vital differences between the two which distinguish one from another and are founded on very powerful beliefs. Both political parties are beneficial to the United States in their own way, and both also have their downfalls. Examples of some different beliefs the two parties have are on tax policy, social issues, labor and free trade, education, and health care. Although the Democratic Party is the world’s oldest existing political party, I tend to lean towards the Conservative party for two reasons. One, being that I agree with the party more than with the liberal party, and two, most issues I find …show more content…
The primary reason for the tax policy that the Democratic Party supports is for raising certain taxes to provide for government spending, but in the big picture, the only thing it is achieving is hurting our economic growth. The conservative party has the idea that lower taxes create more incentives for people to work, save, invest, and engage in entrepreneurial endeavors. In reality, that is exactly what lowering taxes does. It is beneficial to our economy and encourages work and independence to all of the United States …show more content…
I agree and relate with the conservatives more than I do with the liberals, but there are times where I agree with the philosophies the liberal party has. But for the most part, when it comes down to the ultimate decision of which party I would chose, I consider myself a Republican. There is a certain type of republicanism that I fall towards, and that would be Fiscal Conservatism, which is the economic philosophy of prudence in government spending and debt, arguing that a government does not have the right to run up large debts and then throw the burden on the taxpayer (Philosophybasics.com). Since tax and education are two big issues for both political parties, it is essential in knowing which side you agree with. They are both very significant issue to me, and the fiscal conservatism philosophy would be the best fitting choice for my

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    High taxes push companies to move abroad and make business elsewhere. This results in the loss of jobs and other financial investments. In reducing taxes Republicans believe that the economy will grow and prosper. In a Republicans stand point, those who have worked hard and succeed in investing shouldn’t be punished. Democrats, contrastively “believe the wealthiest Americans and largest corporations must pay their fair share of taxes.” Democrats are against those companies who walk out on America and don’t pay taxes, they believe that everyone should pay their fair share instead of hiding business abroad.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Let’s start with taxation. Conservatives believes in tax cut and less financial spending. They think that rich should not pay the poor through taxation [2]. This is exactly why I said earlier that liberalism is more logical. Liberals wants the government to provide more services to the needy people, if necessary by increasing taxes.…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Liberals believe that government action should be taken to achieve equality for each and every citizen. They believe that the government has obligations it needs to fulfill, so government intervention is favorable, especially within the economy where it needs to regulate business and government programs. Conservatives on the other hand prefer smaller, slower changes. Rather than having the government involved in the economy, they prefer a laissez faire regulation of the market and businesses. One particularly distinctual factor of conservatives is that they believe in the concept of volunteerism and self-advocacy compared to the liberal belief that it’s largely the government’s responsibility to take care of its citizens.…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, he was still a member of the GOP, so he obviously was not extremely liberal. On the political spectrum, Roosevelt belongs in between establishment liberal and moderate, making him a moderate liberal. Present day politicians he would be most like are Jim Webb and George Pataki. Of course, both Pataki and Roosevelt have been the Republican governor of New York with moderate liberal viewpoints. Although I believe that he was a moderate liberal, many other political scientists could disagree with me.…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Campaign finance reformers would most like to see a cap placed on how much can be spent “independent” of campaigns just as there is a cap with how much can be contributed directly to a campaign. Unfortunately, Citizens United quashed any notion of spending caps because as previously stated the Court feels caps would inhibit free speech. Caps would help equalize the influence between the wealthy and the non-wealthy, and discourage bribery and extortion. Also, contribution limits would improve public political efficacy in the election process by reducing the presence of corruption, the appearance of corruption, and the appearance of inequality. Many Americans adhere to the idea that politicians and the political process are corrupt.…

    • 1311 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Which is means the Republicans support the federal government with limited powers and a strong state governments, while Democrats believe in the power of the federal government is greater. The Republicans give great freedom to the individual to each person to be responsible for himself which is it advocate the participation in economic that will lead to growth through free competition and encourage people to use their innovative ideas. The government will only intervene when people are not able to act alone. On the other hand, Democrats believe that the responsibility of the government to take care of its citizens for the benefits of the country a well because they believe that the economy is likely to be difficult to be handled individually. (Danziger,…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalists from the pre-Constitutional era remained Federalists, while Jeffersonians named themselves Democratic-Republican. President Washington warned about the dangers of political parties because they would divide the government and the nation into sides. Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson led their parties, the Federalist and the Democratic-Republic respectively. As Washington had predicted, the nation was divided between two points of views, but political parties allow people to choose a side upon matters of supporting different ideas. Although Democratic-Republicans favored the common man, Federalists appeared more appealing because they favored the elite and the educated, prefered a strong federal government, and applied a loose construction of the Constitution.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Friedman argues that this sets up a government where people who are in special interests groups benefit, rather than the general interest of the people. He says that these conflicting policies work against the “invisible hand” created by Adam Smith.5 Friedman says that this happens when one person is advocating to get a major benefit from something that is in their special interest group. However, if that one person is getting many smaller benefits from various things, it may actually cancel the cost out. But, he will continue to favor that one program because it benefits him.6 An article by Scott Sumner titled “What Would Milton Friedman Have Thought of the Great Recession?" talks about Friedman’s views on the Great Depression.…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Republican Party believes that taxes should be the same for everyone no matter how much you make and that the wages should be set by the free market, where the Democratic party believes that there should be a minimum wage that everyone has to make and that the higher your tax bracket is the more you should pay in taxes.(n.d.) This tends to be a debate that continuously is argued over and over inside of the government as they both want for their party. This tends to be an ethical issue because it leads to them doing what’s best for them and they leave out what is best for the American…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Daniel J. Boorstin claims there is a significant distinction between disagreement and dissent in a liberal society, arguing that disagreement is essential to the vitality of democracy, while dissent is effectively its cancer. I agree with Boorstin’s distinction as it applies in a historical context because disagreement promoted the rights of the people, while dissent seriously endangered them. However, I do not believe his distinction holds entirely true in contemporary America because the federal government’s protection of people’s rights is too secure for dissent to significantly weaken democracy. During the sequence of events at America’s founding as a democratic nation in the late 18th century, democracy relied on disagreement. After…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays