Contradictions In Bhagavad Gita

Most, if not all, religions look up to deities that are said to be powerful, ever-present and extremely complex. In Hinduism, Krishna fills this role. Throughout the Bhagavad Gita, Krishna reveals different sides of himself by identifying as a god, human, nature, as well as a more abstract being. There are many different aspects of Krishna, yet one of the most important is his interaction and connection with action. Similar to other texts, there are contradictions within Krishna’s teachings of action. These contradictions within Krishna’s teaching of action are essential to the Bhagavad Gita because Krishna, as a god, has the ability to overcome these contradictions and still provide stability and comfort for his people. One contradiction …show more content…
In order to set an example of his ideas and teachings, Krishna must remain detached toward the earth he has created. He blatantly says that he is “impartial to all creatures” and has an unbiased opinion on what may happen (9.28). After creating the earthly realm, Krishna takes a step back and lets his creations live on. He states that only in times of chaos will he intervene (4.6). When Krishna acts during these times, he is showing preference towards a certain outcome. If he were unbiased, Krishna would “not engage relentlessly in action,” causing the world to crumble, creating disorder and destruction in society (3.23). He would also not feel the need to intervene in everyday life to keep stability and peace. When Krishna states that he is impartial, he does it to reassure his people, even though he may not be. He needs to set an example of his teachings for his people to follow although he himself isn’t restricted to his teachings. Krishna wants to make sure his people trust and believe in him and his power, yet he feels the responsibility to take care of his creations. As a bystander, Krishna acts as though he is impartial, yet his main goal is to set an example for his