A contract consists of an offer, an acceptance, intention to create legal relations, and consideration. There must be a definite, clearly stated offer to do something. The chain store did make it clear that they would sell Sam’s products. Sam and the store owner did accept the offer for the units. Which was acceptance. But there is no written contract of the agreement.
Since there is no written contract it would be hard to prove that there was a contract to agree too. If the store owner has proof then he can win the case against Sam. But under a quasi-contract the chain store can win against Sam and force him to abide by the oral contract.
Since landlord claims that Sam has violated the rental agreement, she must inform the Sam in writing
Since there is no written contract it would be hard to prove that there was a contract to agree too. If the store owner has proof then he can win the case against Sam. But under a quasi-contract the chain store can win against Sam and force him to abide by the oral contract.
Since landlord claims that Sam has violated the rental agreement, she must inform the Sam in writing