There have been different developments over the years to address the issues of clean-up of contamination caused by historical sources and naturally occurring contaminants in some areas in the United Kingdom. In the contexts of the UK, the publication of the consultation paper 'Paying for our Past ' by the government in 1994, sets out policies and practical tensions on how the UK should deal with contaminated …show more content…
The definition does not refers to land where the contamination is just present, but where it is, or could be, causing a particular harm. Therefore, the existence of contamination needs to be put into some form of context against which the need to intervene and require clean up can be assessed. This raised confusing questions about what it really intended and what the term is meant to imply. Another challenge of the whole issues of contaminated land in the UK is that, there are numbers of overlapping controls between different regimes which bring confusions as how clean up should be dealt with. The overlapping brings about difficulties of coordination between the powers involved, especially where are two concurrent powers available to two different regulators. An example of this will be in a situation which pollution of controlled waters is being or likely to be caused from contaminated land, both the local authority and the Environment Agency possess powers to require clean up under the Water Resources Act and part 2A, respectively. This contentious is identified and its interaction with other regime is regulated through a memorandum of understanding that governs how the powers will be