Constitutional Rights Research Paper

Improved Essays
Many foreign bodies cross our borders secretly everyday, some good, some bad, but all enter with a purpose. With the open holes in our national security, foreign terrorists can attack at any moment. When the disaster or incident occurs, if the suspect is found and taken into custody and not a US citizen, but the act was within US borders, do they have constitutional rights or not? With a foreign criminal given their right to remain silent, or to have any rights for that matter, and lose vital information, would you accept the fact that since the crime was on American soil, the rights come into play or let the rights be diminished to gain public safety for the country? "During a number of armed conflicts throughout U.S. history, from the …show more content…
So when foreigners, wether it being a small crime or a national disaster, we all want to be treated as one whole. So if foreigners get to surpass the law, why cant you? The answer is, your a citizen so you don't get that kind of "special treatment" But those laws can help more than hurt you when it comes into judicial terms "The full constitutional due process protections apply on U.S. territory to citizens and legal residents or visitors, provided they did not gain legal entry by fraud. That does not mean such foreigners don't have full rights of life, liberty, and property, but due process may be truncated, provided authority for doing so is conferred by Congress, by either a declaration of war or letters of marque and reprisal. That authority is needed for such actions as trial of prisoners by a military tribunal, or putting bounties on the heads of suspects. In the absence of such authority, only defensive actions may be taken, without violating the law, represented by 18 USC 2441, which applies to everyone involved, including the president." (Roland) So if you are a citizen and are allowed to be within our borders, you have constitutional rights, if you are illegally here, then your rights are guaranteed. Especially if you threaten our …show more content…
With this talk about foreigns and wether to give them rights or not, shouldnt we protect from the inside out, not from the outside in? To create a safer homeland first, and then create a secured border, creates the least work into not having do deal with these rights. many accidents happen within a mile from home, not a country away. Changing the way we think on what is this so called " Homeland security" and " Public Safety" how is the safety public, when we worry with what is happening across the world and not what is in our front

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution Guards Against Tyranny Articles of confederation didn’t turn out to work, we want a tyranny free government. Will the constitution accomplish a free tyranny government? The 13 colonies were governed by the British until the Revolutionary war. The Revolutionary war was America and 13 colonies fighting for Independence, Great Britain decided to sign a treaty. The 13 colonies were frustrated that Great Britain was making them pay taxes.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the revolutionary war, America was struggling with finding an effective Government that does not include a tyrant for a leader. For the first few year of freedom, America followed the Articles of Confederation. This did not work because although they didn’t have a tyrant for a leader, “there was no chief executive, there was no court system, there was not even a way for the central government to force a state to pay taxes.” (How Did the Constitution Guard Against Tyranny?). In 1787, when the Constitution was created, it was agreed that the Constitution should be able to make an efficient government free of tyranny.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Once a state has created a law and it has been determined to be constitutional, the enforcement process lends itself to judicial scrutiny when brought before the court. When the process of enforcement and the discovery of evidence have been put into motion, the circumstance surrounding how law enforcement came into contact with the accused is one of the first things reviewed - much of the initial interaction is based on the enforcement of State laws, which cascades into protected rights when the enforcement effort starts, or elements of a crime have been discovered. Since the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Bill of Rights applies the Federal Government, and the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause makes the Bill of Rights applicable…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The 5th Amendment in the Constitution states, “… nor shall any person… be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda V. Arizona

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Student’s Name Professor’s Name Course Title Date of Submission Miranda vs. Arizona The Miranda warning has become one of the most common statements used by police officers across all states in America. The court case of Miranda vs. Arizona set precedence in protecting the rights of alleged criminals when taken into custody by law enforcement officers. The ruling rendered has withstood the test of time in restructuring American criminal jurisprudence.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bill Of Rights Dbq Essay

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages

    According to History.com, the Bill of Rights is the symbol of what lies at the heart of American idea of individual liberty, limited government, and the rule of law. The Bill of Rights was created to protect the citizens but was not considered important until supporters of the Constitution saw it was pivotal to ratify it. James Madison, the fourth president, was able to make the Bill of Rights officially became part of the Constitution in December 1791 (2009). With the Bill of Rights in place along with the rest of the Constitution, many supreme court cases had arise from citizens fighting for their rights. A prime example involved students John and Mary Beth Tinker with a friend in December 1965.…

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What does the word fairness mean in today's society? By its very definition, fairness is the impartial and just treatment or behavior without favoritism or discrimination, but does that rule apply to ex-felons. Should ex-felons be shown fairness after breaking the law. To keep the jurisdiction over the community and justice, Assembly Bill 181 should not be passed. Citizens who are willing to abide by the law and follow the rules should be the only ones who are allowed governmental privileges, such as the right to vote.…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    H.R. 5800/S. 2981- Secure Data Act of 2014 The United States Constitution under the Fourth Amendment ensures our right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures, and by extension has been interpreted to protect our right of privacy. The Fourth Amendment states: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized” (The Charters of Freedom). There has been much controversy as to what is considered to be protected under constitutional law relating to one’s right of privacy. Although a reasonable right to privacy is not explicitly stated in the Constitution, this particular right has developed into a civil liberty protected by the Fourth, Fifth and Fourteenth amendments.…

    • 1800 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abstract In the modern times back in the late 18th century in the Constitution where the Founding Fathers were established the to rebuild the federal government to become more efficient than the recent government under the Article of Confederation, they were also published and ratified the ten natural rights of the citizens known as the Bill of Rights. In the Bill of Rights of the Congress, the Second Amendment, which infers that the people of the society has been entitled to have possessions of bearing weapons; although, in the modern society of today, where the amendment has become the most controversial of the Bill of Rights,as the critics came to a solution by preventing the people of the world of having…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, treble citizenship has far more disadvantages as history has shows the U.S Constitution provides only partial protection of basic tribal and American citizenship rights. For example, the 1st Amendment has been interpreted by the Supreme Court as not protecting the religious freedom rights of tribal members. This can be seen in the case, Employment Division v. Smith,where the Supreme Court held that a state can deny unemployment benefits to a worker fired for using illegal drugs for religious purposes. Native Americans are also not guaranteed protection under the 5th Amendment as seen in the case United States v. Wheeler, in which the court ruled that the Double Jeopardy Clause does not bar the federal prosecution of a Native American. This is in part because of the Supreme Court case United States v Nice which declared that Congress still retained plenary power when Native Americans were granted citizenship.…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States is mostly known for the freedoms it gives its citizens, even the ones accused of crimes. While it is common thought that those in jail or on trial have fewer rights than the innocent, they do in fact have rights that the innocent do not need to execute. These rights are found in amendments IV, V, VI, and VIII and are referred to as the rights of the accused. Amendment IV refers to the rights of a citizen's privacy. Citizens are not to be subject to unwarranted and unreasonable searches and seizures by government and law officials.…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States is obligated to keep its citizens safe, but what happens when people take the fight inside the United States? On September 11, 2001, the World Trade center was attacked using hijacked airplanes. After the attack the U.S. responded by substantially increasing the amount of security at airports now to a point where it has become a point of a violation of the Fourth amendment. The government passed the Patriot Act, which allows them to spy on the citizens of the U.S. to effectively protect citizens from terrorism. It gets to a point in a Machiavellian society where the line between what is lawful and unlawful is…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bill Of Rights Analysis

    • 1309 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It is designed to protect U.S territory and the population from threats within and external to the U.S. The Bill of rights outlines the rights and liberties it is institution such as Homeland security that ultimately enforce these rights. Therefore the Bill of rights does protect the rights and liberties of…

    • 1309 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Police Officers

    • 1703 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Officers In the United States of America “You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for you. Do you understand the rights I have just read to you?…

    • 1703 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A court case in 2005 named Gonzales v. City of Castle Rock explains that limited rights are presented by the Fourteenth Amendment. Julie Hilden writes “The Court majority did concede that in certain limited circumstances the Constitution does require States to affirmatively protect individuals.” Yes, the government does have some rights to protect us, but the actual human’s rights still have to be upheld. I 've already stated in my last paragraph that it would violate the human’s rights even if he was a suspected terrorist. To exercise these rights, the government has established many anti-terrorist programs that have been made to counter the rise of these vicious attacks.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays