Constitutional Monarchy Essay

Great Essays
Constitutional Monarchy is the only way to govern a country?
A constitutional monarchy is when both the Government’s and the Crown’s powers are restricted by the overriding statute referred to as the constitution. Australia serves as the best example of a constitutional monarchy, other examples include New Zealand, Canada and Denmark. The United Kingdom is slightly different with no single constitutional document but a prominent Monarchy. The USA however, consists of a constitution without a monarchy, crown or head of state, this is known as a Republic. Other examples of a Republics include Russia and Brazil.
What is thought-provoking is that while Australia, the UK and the US have formed different types of government, they still abide by
…show more content…
Australia’s Division of Powers and Separation of Powers are an important part of our democratic society.
Australia’s separation of powers divides the institutions of government into three different branches. This includes legislative, whose role is to create laws, executive, whose role is to enforce laws and judicial whose role is to interpret laws and solve civil disputes. Although there is a general understanding that the separation of powers do not interfere with each other, there is sometimes a ‘common ground’ between all three levels. For example front bench ministers in Parliament exist in both the executive and legislative departments.
The separation of powers ensures that these roles can be carried out effectively without partiality. It keeps one part of the government from dominating and becoming too powerful. History shows that unlimited power in the hands of one group or establishment means that others are suppressed and their powers condensed. The separation of powers seeks to prevent abuse of power and be a safeguard for liberty. An example of this can be shown when the legislative department also had the authority to interpret laws and solve civil disputes in ancient Britain. (Parlament.gv.at,
…show more content…
Australia’s court system is divided into different categories for numerous reasons.
Australia’s court system is divided into four different categories, High, Supreme, District and Magistrates. Within these courts there is an appellate jurisdictions and consists of both criminal and civil cases. Depending on the severity of the crime, different cases will be heard in different courts. For example murder would be heard in the Supreme Court whilst minor offences might be heard in the district or magistrates court. This allows plaintiffs and defendants to pursue their case if they are certain that there has been a legal wrong.
Lower courts such as the district court or the magistrate’s court are compelled by higher courts, such as the High or Supreme Court when reaching their decisions, unless they have the ability to distinguish the facts of the case before them from the precedent case. To put it simply there would have been several injustices over history if there was only one court. It also allows the different States to have different courts to suit their jurisdictions and

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    1.0 Introduction As a nation, Australians have become a unique group of individuals, vastly different from the British who settled in this country. Australia is a multicultural continent with its own laws, constitution and systems, so why should Australians still be a part of the constitutional monarchy under Britain? Why should it not become a republic, and increase its independence? This report will investigate the currant system Australia operates under, and the suggestions that have been made in the past to change to a republic, to come to a conclusion on whether or not Australia should become a republic, or remain a constitutional monarchy.…

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Constitution Dbq Analysis

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Another time we see separation of powers is in the venn diagram in document 6. It shows the split between powers given to government and powers given to the states. The central governments and the state governments have their own powers but they also share powers. For example, one of powers given to the government is to regulate trade, while on the other hand one of the powers given to the states is to set up local governments and hold elections.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Limited Government Since the people are the source of the government’s power, the Government may only use the power that its people gives. Meaning that Everyone including the government must follow all rules of the constitution. Example: Government can’t throw somebody in jail for expressing their opinion about the government.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How Does the Constitution Guard Against Tyranny? How do you think the Constitution guards against tyranny? Do you think it was difficult to frame a government to guard against one specific problem? In the year 1787 in Philadelphia a group of men were faced with the task of writing a new Constitution for America, but this task proved to be difficult.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This quote from James Madison declares that the purpose for separation of powers is to make sure that not one person will hold too much power, no matter it be to make laws and enforce them, enforce law and explain them, or any combination of the three. If someone were to have power in more than one field, they would be classified as a tyrant. This is why today, we do not let someone in legislative, executive, and judicial at the same time because no matter what kind of government, a tyrant can still exist within that government. To make sure that no one person can be a part of more than one branch, Articles 1, 2, and 3 state the position of each branch. Article one, Section one gives the legislative power to congress.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Framers Research Paper

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Separation of powers was exceptionally important to the framers when creating our government. They were immensely worried about one branch becoming too strong and needed a solution to ensure that it would not happen. The Framers created the three branches of government and put checks and balances on each one. Each branch has a number of checks on the others. An example of this is the executive branch has the power to veto a bill from the legislative branch, but the legislative branch can override the veto by a three fifths majority vote…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Equal power among each branch protects against tyranny because no branch is overpowered. The three departments of power are separated and…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This essay will discuss why the Australian Constitution has separated the legislative, executive and judicial powers. The separation of powers is about preserving our freedom as enshrined in the Australian Constitution. The history of the separation of powers theory will be discussed, also there will be references to weekly reading materials and weekly tasks. Argued will be that the reasoning behind the separation of power is to ensure that no branch of government or an individual has sole power of the government and the country with the checks and balances system being vital to ensure the former statement. Governmental Powers Described In order to understand why we separate the legislative, executive and judicial powers in the Australian…

    • 1817 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Topic 1: “Should QLD reinstate an upper house?” The actions of Queensland Politicians, over the past years, have produced an object lesson in the dangers of unrestrained authority and as a result has prompted the question, “should Queensland reinstate an upper house”. Although reinstating the legislative council will not amend the many issues facing Queensland, it will be beneficial to return to a bicameral state. In 1922 legislation was passed in Queensland abolishing the upper house, also known as the legislative council, and as a result is the only unicameral state in Australia (Queensland Government 2011).…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    INTRODUCTION This essay examines the Australian court hierarchy, and the extension power the High Court attains as it has the ability too overturn decisions made by the Supreme Court. As it is the final court of appeal therefore reintegrates the point that the power of appointment is held within the body of the High Court. As the Australian Federal system consists of national court and a court system for each individual state and the two territories.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Australia is said to be a democracy and seen as being about the people, and fair for all. Thus, separation of powers was formed to make sure that this is the case. Separation of powers puts the institutions of government into three different branches. These branches are: The legislature which make the laws; the executive government put laws into action; and the third brach,the judiciary interprets the laws. Separation of Powers is said to be the cornerstone of fair government.…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Legislative Branch and the Executive Branch are both part of the three branches that where put into place to separate power. Also known as separation of powers. Both of these branches has specific powers that they can each do. The Legislative Branch is made up of the House of Representatives and the Senate.…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (1900) set of fundamental laws that dictate how powers are granted, ordered and exercised within the Australian Commonwealth. As Australia’s social and political climate changes with time, the constitution is changed due to it’s out-dated, irrelevant or lack of clauses. This can happen in several ways with two distinct outcomes – its form can be altered (the actual text and clauses of the written act change) or its operation can be reinterpreted. The Constitution was originally drafted to clearly outline the states’ and the Commonwealth’s divergent powers in a binding document. However, 115 years passed and the constitution created with the intention of granting states a semblance of autonomy,…

    • 1698 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This concept is extraordinarily introduced in the first three articles of the constitution. The vital variable that contributed to the Separation of Powers is that when one individual or group of people has boundless power, they can get to be dangerous to the society. Separation of power takes the control of the perspective that not any branches of government turn out to have a lot of power. The Separation of Powers recognized between The Executive, the Legislative, and the Judicial Branch. They are classified by the sort of the duties they wield.…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The ‘separation of powers’ is a doctrine that has caused much debate through the centuries, and although it is difficult to find its exact origins, it is possible to distinguish a basic separation of powers doctrine from the writings of Greek philosopher Aristotle. He remarked that a constitution must have three elements to be effective. The three are, first the deliberative, which discusses everything of common importance; second, the officials…; and third, the judicial element. The English political theorist, John Locke, conceived a similar idea about the different types of power.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays