Constitutional Framers

Improved Essays
During the Constitutional Convention, when the framers took up the charge of creating the document that would see the newly formed nation into an ambiguous future they were met with a lengthy list of challenges. If the document they created was not definitive and resilient it would not endure. It had to be more than just a guide to the way Americans should behave towards one another, it also had ensure that one’s chosen to lead could not abuse the authority given to them at the expense of the people. For the purposes of this paper we will focus on representation, excessive democracy and governmental oversight.

One of the problems the framers were tasked to resolve included the distribution of political power. More specifically fair representation considering the differences between the large and small states. The framers had to wrestle with controversial proposals. The first was called the Virginia plan (large states) and the other was called the New Jersey plan (small states). The Virginia plan argued for a two-house legislature while the New Jersey plan thought a single house was better. Larger states lobbied for representation based on a state’s population, while the smaller states thought it better for equal
…show more content…
While they wanted to create a democratic form of government, their experiences with various elements of a true democracy would be difficult and could lead to an excessive democracy. So the framers essentially created a Republic where the people could select or elect representatives to make and enforce laws on their behalf. This solution allowed protects the government from the passion of the people, while protecting them from each other. It also helped ensure the government could not be used as an agent of oppression. However, this too was flawed because it can most certainly be argued that slavery which was legal, thus being enforced by the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In 1787, a convention was held to assemble all of the fifty-five delegates at the Pennsylvania state house in Philadelphia. During this convention the New Jersey plan and the Virginia plan which were inherited from the Articles of Confederation were discussed. These two plans had different opinions on how the states were to be represented. The New Jersey plan called for equal representation between the thirteen states. While the Virginia plan called for representation by population.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At the Constitutional Convention, the fifty-five delegates come together to make brilliant laws to prevent tyranny in their country. In documents A,C, and D, it lists the laws that made the United States more of a democracy rather than a republic. The delegates established federalism to prevent tyranny in the Unites States by.... “The different governments will each control each other, at the same time that each will be controlled by itself.”…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some would say that that the framers of the Constitution limited the power of the President enough by giving some powers to congress, but the more valid perspective is that the framers of the Constitution did not limit the President’s powers enough because some powers of Congress have changed to be the President’s powers. In the constitution, the President has many powers such as being Commander in chief of the army, appointing ambassadors and supreme court justices, and making sure laws are faithfully executed. The President has all of these powers, but more recently, the President has taken over some powers that Congress is supposed to have. The framers of the Constitution gave the President too many powers.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Convention Dbq

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages

    6) After deciding on the rules that would govern the proceedings, delegates prepared to hear proposals on the critical issue that led to the convention: amending and improving the Articles of Confederation. They ended up writing the constitution. Therefore it exceeded its authority. 7) Would the United States have been better off if the Virginia Plan had been adopted as presented? a) States with a large population, like Virginia (which was the most populous state at the time), would thus have more representatives than smaller states.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of these was known as the Madison’s Virginia Plan. This was by James Madison who was from Virginia. A national form of government should be established consisting of the branches Legislative, Executive and Judiciary. This type of government was very different than that of the Confederation. The delegates were set very much in their ways that they voted to accept this after only a very little…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Smaller states were in favor of the New Jersey Plan, under which all states would have the same amount of representation in the legislature. On the other finger, large…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Due to the “Articles of Confederation” inability to tax, and the rising debt, Alexander Hamilton, and James Madison organized a conference at Annapolis in 1786. They planned a convention at Philadelphia to revise the constitution to make it more efficient. Two plans for the new government were discussed. The “Virginia Plan” included an executive and a judicial branch of two houses. The lower house representatives would be assigned by state according to population then the lower house would elect an upper house.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Federalist No. 10 Analysis

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages

    When James Madison outlines the dangers of faction in Federalist No. 10, he defines faction as “a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or minority of the whole, who are united...by some common...interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens.” 1 This wording is critical for examining both the goals and pivotal ideas of the federalist movement. At first glance, this definition seems to reflect the very real fear of mob uprising. Certainly, it’s tone insinuates an image of mob citizenry diametrically opposed to a smaller elite. However, although this image may have captured this political component of the United States in November 1787, a closer inspection yields a less controversial interpretation.…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Debate

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Prior to The Great Compromise of 1787, the two main plans put forth at the Constitutional Convention were the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan. The larger states favored the Virginia Plan, as the number of representatives in both houses of Congress per state was based strictly on population, giving them more power. The smaller states preferred the New Jersey Plan, which ensured that all states had the same number of votes. The Great Compromise, which became the basis of the new American government, was possible through the coming together of the small states and the large states. In this new plan, the number of representatives per state in the lesser House was based on population and the number of representatives in the upper House was the same for each state, satisfying both sides of the debate (Lapsansky-Werner, 356).…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Large states wanted a population-based representation, but the small states wanted equal representation. Roger Sherman proposed a solution that there would be two houses of Congress. In Sherman’s solution, there would be a Senate with representation equal between all states and a House of Representatives with representation based on population. This was called the Great Compromise and the Connecticut Compromise. The next issue was between the northern and southern states regarding slaves.…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The nationalism and patriotism that’s displayed across the United States day to day reflects the overall pride and adoration of its citizens and what they believe. For example, patriotism is instilled in us from a very young age by reciting the Pledge of Allegiance within schools to demonstrate loyalty and pride for our country. To add, our much respected constitutional form of government that is constantly speculated against adds to the enigma of a nation that holds a strong forefront while “securing the bags” of every citizen and their profound rights and liberties. The underlying goal that the Framers of the Constitution and Founding Fathers desired to achieve a strong form of government that despite it being created in the 18th century,…

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The 18th century was a time of change and reform for Americans. Having gained newfound independence from Great Britain, they now faced the task of coming up with an efficient way to govern themselves. After a long process, both the Constitution, and eventually the Bill of Rights, both emerged and both which are still the governing documents of America today. In Jack Rakove’s book, Declaring Rights, he states that “how Americans thought about bills of rights was a function of how they thought about constitutionalism more generally.” He was correct in his statement; Americans views on constitutionalism did directly affect how they viewed bills of rights.…

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Role of the Citizen in a Constitutional Democracy Despite major conflicts and social changes, the American Constitution has offered a framework of governance for over two hundred years. The Framers of the American constitution sought to create a government free of tyrannical rule—where power derives from the consent of the governed. The US constitution outlines a form of national government that aims to serve the American people by protecting their rights and liberties. The US constitution is succinct and difficult to amend; congress has only passed twenty-seven amendments since the ratification of the constitution. In this essay, I will analyze the arguments Robert Dahl’s presents in his book “How Democratic is the American Constitution”…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many years ago our founding fathers made a government without tyranny, they were smart to do this because they didn't want to have all the power in the hands of one person or group. Delegates (55) gathered in Philadelphia at the Constitutional Convention to frame a government without too much power in the hands of one person or a group. The Constitution was signed September 17, 1787. How did these framers protect us from tyranny ? They wanted to create a government without tyranny and they did by creating federalism, separation of powers, checks and balances, and the small state big state compromise.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays