Constitutional Carry Pros And Cons

Improved Essays
There are now 14 states with constitutional carry laws. Constitutional carry is the ability to carry a firearm without a conceal carry permit, it is also known as a permitless carry. The remaining states, their laws concerning conceal carry permits break two constitutional amendments; the second amendment and the 14th amendment of the U.S. constitution. The second amendment states, "A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." The most compelling part of this is amendment is the right to "keep and bear arms. The 14th amendment section one states, "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, …show more content…
We have rights that next to nobody is against. The first amendment is a bipartisan right we all are glad we have. Now let's treat the first amendment like we do the second amendment. What if you needed a permit to be able to exercise our first amendment right? What if you needed to take a class before you could speak out against your government? Ok now you did all the requirements to get your freedom of speech badge; but guess what, your badge is only good in eight states. Oh, no, you need to travel to California and they don't accept any other freedom of speech badges but their own. That sounds ridiculous, doesn't it? Can you imagine the outrage that would cause? This is how thousands of people just like me feel about our second amendment …show more content…
United States, 524 U. S. 125 (1998), in the course of analyzing the meaning of "carries a firearm" in a federal criminal statute, Justice Ginsburg wrote that "surely a most familiar meaning is, as the Constitution's Second Amendment . . . indicate[s]: ‘wear, bear, or carry . . . upon the person or in the clothing or in a pocket, for the purpose . . . of being armed and ready for offensive or defensive action in a case of conflict with another person (wwwsupremecourt.gov).'" This Supreme Court Justice was nominated by former President Bill Clinton and her party affiliation is the democratic party. Her interpretation of the second amendment isn't political, it's the interpretation of the meaning of bearing arms in the second amendment. Our second amendment right doesn't stop in the privacy of our own home. We are afforded the right to be able to defend ourselves in our homes or outside our

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment- The second amendment has been at times the cornerstone of political controversies or arguments throughout the decades due to what many would construe as an open ended interpretation by the founding fathers on the right of an American to own a firearm. The first and in many cases major line of ‘defense’ (no pun intended) for gun advocates, stating the original ideology of the founding fathers and those who founded this nation was a nation based on the freedom to bear arms for ones self interests. The amendment states “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” , and many feel as though the key words are ‘shall not be…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, the way the amendment was interpreted was that state militias had the "right to bear arms," and also that the word "bear" actually meant to possess with the intent of confronting someone in an offensive or defensive manner. By referring to how in the constitution it says citizens have the right to self preservation, and he infers that this means we should have the right to defend ourselves and not just our communities. To support his reasoning, Scalia uses the opinions of scholars, and historians who had also believed that the people who drafted the second amendment intended the right to apply to individuals and not just state militias. Another strong piece of evidence he used was the fact that several other states had already decided to interpret the amendment in such a…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    14th Amendment Dbq

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The fourteenth amendment was one of great change and controversy. The amendment addressed equal protection of the laws, due-process of law, and citizenship . In section one of the 14th amendment it states “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Francisco, California, USA] : Kanopy Streaming, 2016. Streaming video file from Kanopy (Lease). : 14: Dred Scott, Wong Kim Ark and Vanessa Lopez explores the recurring question about who has the right to be an American citizen. 14 examines the citizenship clause of the 14th Amendment through compelling personal stories and expertly-told history. Under the Fourteenth Amendment, All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rufus King Essay

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The 14th amendment states “ All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bear Arms Dbq

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Due to the human nature of self-defense, sport, and surviving, the second amendment will always remain relevant in society. Although there are many regulations as to who can own a gun, where they are allowed, and requiring a permit to carry and concealed weapon, the second amendment still protects and grants the right of the militia and citizens to “keep and bear arms”. In order to ensure that the government couldn’t take away the citizens firearms, the founding fathers preserved their right to self-defense with the ratification of the second amendment on December 15, 1791. In today's society, Americans are still trying to defend their right to bear arms.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ratified in December 1791, the second amendment provides U.S. citizens the right to bear arms. The second amendment gives every citizen the right to own a gun free of federal regulations, to protect themselves in the face of danger. In the article The Second Amendment & the Right to Bear Arms” by Chad Brooks, James Madison proposed “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” The amendment militia clause was never meant to restrict each citizen’s rights to bear arms. This amendment is based on our god given right, as well as the founders believed that the greatest protection we have to ensure our liberty is an armed citizenry.…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The year of 2015 would be known as the year that seemingly everyone in the United States of America was offended by something. Throughout the year, it seemed as though the First Amendment had been liberally thrown around during controversial times. Due to this year’s subjects of controversy being surrounded around the First Amendment, some Americans are suggesting that the First Amendment should be regulated or restricted in special cases. Although it seems like only a few extreme number of people would even assert the idea that the First Amendment gives too much freedom, this idea is becoming more common among the American people. A survey conducted by the First Amendment Center reported that in 2013, 34% of Americans believed the First Amendment…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the founding fathers of the United States wrote the Constitution, they added the Bill of Rights which is a set of the first the ten amendments of to the Constitution. The second of these amendments, states that "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." (U.S Const. Amend II). Particularly, this amendment is interpreted in many ways; some pro gun-control groups say only militias are allowed to bear arms, and pro gun groups say that every citizen is allowed to bear arms.…

    • 1790 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Our rights to express ourselves are protected by the first amendment, yet they are being challenged by the same government that granted us…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore. The second Amendment is basically stating the people have the right to own guns. In Washington Steven Blacktongue entered a store with a hatchet which prompted a civilian to pull her concealed weapon and use it (gunsamerica.com). The woman was not arrested or legally charged because she was met with deadly force so it was her right to use her concealed weapon. The woman not getting charged was yet another example of how rights are guaranteed as citizens.…

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    "The only thing that stops a bad man with a gun is a good man with a gun. " This is the basis of the argument for CC or concealed carry. Many people are clamoring for more gun control to stop crime sprees. However, history has shown that in a society with widespread weapon carrying, crime decreases. This is due to that when a criminal commits a crime, he is less likely to succeed in his misdeed due to the fact that the townspeople are armed.…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is very clear and stated soundly, that the right to bear arms by the people shall not be infringed upon. Therefore, this paper establishes that gun ownership is indeed an inherent right. The application of gun control measures by the courts, therefore, should be based not only on the first clause of the text of the Second Amendment, but on both clauses, which are separately interpreted. Therefore the decision by certain courts to determine that civilians vacate the right to own guns independent of the state is unfounded and…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The right to bear arms is our Second Amendment. What people need to understand is that these laws were made a very long time ago. This amendment was made so that we would have a chance to fight back at the government if they ever got too tyrannical. The thing is, our government could never be anything but a democracy. It is one of the things we are most known for and no one would stand for it if we became anything but.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Point blank, and the gun is fired. Aimed at the other person, whose hands shake with rage, or is it fear? Ambulances and hospital doctors go sporadic, only mere moments to save a person’s life. A school shooter takes the life of multiple students and then attempts his own. All of this could have been solved if someone was there to prevent the shooter.…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays