Constitution Pros And Cons

Decent Essays
The Constitution is not just a piece of paper that tells us what we are and are not allowed to do, but it is a guideline for the government for the things they can and cannot do. The pros on having a constitution is that it gives a complete outline one the purpose and the roles of the U.S government and also protects the right of the people and the states by stating what the government can’t do so it protect everyone’s rights. Another pro on having the constitution is how it sets up a system of checks and balances between the three branches. This help prevent that no branches become too powerful. Lastly it gives a good balance between the rights of the states, and federal government.
The cons about having a constitution is that society have

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In fact, the First Amendment added an express denial of any such power. Also, why would the government and the people go through all of the effort of passing the Sedition Act of 1798 if the 1st amendment only protects people from prior restraint, the English common law. If this were true, then there would be no need to enact anything else because then the act would add nothing to the laws that were already put in place. Thus, the first amendment is meant to protect the people from all branches of government, so they cannot limit our opinions. The Sedition Act of 1798 was put in place to combat and further the power and role of the government since they had no power over the press…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This means that the Congress or the President should follow the constitution word for word. While the Federalist party held the ideas of general meaning. That said, the Congress or the President has the right to interpret the constitution based on significance. Over all this means that if the constitution doesn’t say it can’t do something then the Federalists believe they have a right to do it. As you can see the two parties show very different ways that they view the constitution as a whole.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Madison’s main argument is that factions are a problem in a well governed society, and that that a good republic should prevent the tyranny of the majority, and protect the rights of the minorities. The constitution of The United States, and The Federalist Papers both outline how a proper republic should be established, with strategies to limit the impact of factions, and create majority and minority rights. Michael Parenti wrote “The Constitution as an Elitist Document”, in which he argues against some of the points made in the Constitution and in the Federalist Papers. John Roche writes “The Founding Fathers: A Reform Caucus in Action”, he argues overwhelmingly in favor of Madison. In Federalist Paper #10, Madison argues that the most important factor in the union is to control factions.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By emphasizing human rights, outside forces catalyze a country towards democratization. The protection of human rights is the basis for the creation of a democracy. Without enforcing these rights, a country will not begin to democratize. Democracy is defined as a type of government that is run by the people, for the people. Through the writing of Sikkink and Pion-Berlin, I am going to explain the importance of human rights and their positive effects on the speed of democratization.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The law ought to be supreme over all” (http://www.crf-usa.org). What is meant by this is that there must be upholders to the law, or there is no point in having a constitution. The reasoning for the constitution is to state laws or principles of the United States and if they are not followed or enforced, then it is pointless. The quote is also trying to say that the constitution should be followed by all people in the United States. No one is excluded from following the law no matter what their position in the society…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Constitution of the United States of America was written with certain protection of its people in mind. It is the responsibility of the government to uphold these laws of humanity. This is what the American people rely on for justice and freedom. It is what America stands for, so if the freedom of speech is not being protected, then we really aren’t…

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the last guards against it is checks and balances which makes sure the different branches are using their power correctly and if they’re not then the others can check them for it. The main ideas in the constitution that protects us from tyranny in the government are, federalism, checks and balances and separation of powers. Federalism is one of the main protections from tyranny in our government. This is local, state and federal government. They helps to protect by making sure that one level of government doesn't get supreme power over the others.…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Federalists and the Anti Federalists have different viewpoints on the clauses presented. The federalist paper number 33 presents the argument that the Federal government is granted authority to make all laws that are necessary and proper for the United States. These laws are to be the supreme law of the land. The Antifederalists disagreed with this idea because they believed it would give too much power to the Federal Government leaving the people and the state governments vulnerable. The federalists saw the idea of doing what is necessary and proper for everyone the best possible solution to the United States.…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    National security and the protection of a state’s citizens is a primary duty for a government. The protection of human rights is also a great responsibility and central to having a modern democracy. A government though must sometimes restrict the human rights of some of its citizens in order to protect the state and its people. The judiciary has a role in deciding when to intervene in the restriction of the human rights of the citizenry when it feels the government has gone too far. In this essay I would argue that the judiciary should not use defence on matters of national security restricting the citizenry’s human rights and should fulfil its role as an independent check on the government in charge of safeguarding human rights.…

    • 1936 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Founding Fathers

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages

    For the Founding Fathers, the necessity of a common power established on the constitution was directly related to management of different ideologies and practices of the states under a balance of power and individual freedoms. However, the definition of power shall not be expressively defined since its ability to corrupt whoever is ruling. The Founding Fathers based their possibility of acquiring power because of the people, who voluntarily would give up their freedom in exchange of a defined structure that would guarantee their liberties and rights. The functionality of Federalism is based on the shared power among the federal state and the national state, where responsible governance would lead to the stability of the…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays