Constitution Debate Research Paper

Decent Essays
Sarah Lewis
10/09/15
Mr. Bishop
HIS 131-05IN
Constitution Debate
I love this country. I love freedom. The constitution is here to protect both. I am here to say that I support the constitution. People call me a federalist because I support the constitution; but I say I am just a man who believes in what is right. We have tried living with the Articles of Confederation, but they just do not work. It is time for a change in our government. That change should be the constitution. If I were to talk about all the reasons why the constitution should be used, we would be here all night. To save us all a little time, I am only going to discuss the three most important reasons why the constitution is a good idea. Firstly, the constitution would
…show more content…
Without money, how can the government operate? We cannot expect the government to make our country great if they do not have the resources to do it. The Articles of Confederation do not grant the government the ability to tax. Perhaps this is why our country has struggled. Thirdly, the constitution would allow the government to form an army. This would be great in time of war. I am very greatly for the militia that we currently have. However, if we were to go to war with another country, we would face a great difficulty. Other countries have organized soldiers who are trained and who have a great number of resources. Our men would be at a great disadvantage in times of war; and we all know that war is almost inevitable. So I ask you today… what do you want? Do you want a government that can support its country and make it great; or do you want a government just to say you have a government? The decisions we make today will affect not just today, but the future. Our children’s children will be impacted by our choices about the government. It is our duty to protect this country and all the people who live in it. The best way to do this is by supporting the constitution. If you love this country and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Even Washington feels that a new constitution would be best. (Doc. F) The world sat and watched this new government forming in America, of course there were doubts from Europe but America, being the “teenager”, wanted to contradict their “Parent” nations and knew that if they worked hard enough they could prove the world wrong with their new Constitution that would last. The A. of C. was the item that caused Europe to doubt and for good reason too. Under its power our government could not even support itself because it lacked the power to tax without state consent. (Doc. C)…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In comparison to the Articles of Confederation, the Constitution is much stronger and stable because it has clear laws that are fair to the people and benefitted for the good of the country. For instance, it allowed more than one group of people to rule others and gave people the freedom to do whatever they wanted as long as it’s constitutional. This was how they made the United States more of a democracy rather than a…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I Casey Nichols representative of North Carolina fully support the long overdue ratification of the Constitution. The Articles Of Confederation are impuissant and short-lived. An continued absence of a new document that conclusively clarifies our affairs will inevitably lead us to defeat. It was unquestionably imperative that we held the constitutional convention. The rationale is quite evident considering all the affairs we don't have elucidations for.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Constitution Act of 1982 transferred the authority to amend the Constitution from Great Britain to Canada. To date, Quebec’s constitutional concerns have not been addressed to a great enough extent, according to the government or the residence, to formally pass consent on the 1982 Constitution. This is largely due to the distinctiveness of the society of Quebec originating from the largely French speaking population, the resilient cultural identity, as well as history, political, and social traditions, that are more or less not shared with the rest of Canada The question in concern is whether or not Canada’s Constitution should recognize the francophone population in Quebec as a ‘nation’ with characteristics and needs palpably different from those of other provinces in the Canadian federation. The problem has been tackled on a number of occasions but has yet to be resolved.…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The reason why the Articles of Confederation were adopted was because of the states. The states were so independent and they did not want any central authority. But, when it was time to pay war debts then it came the Constitution… For the country to be ran more smoothly there needs to be a change in the people. If we try to change the way people think than the country will run smoother.…

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Revolution is over a decade past; it’s 1787, the United States is currently using the Articles of Confederation. The recent events of Shay’s rebellion show us that the Articles of Confederation is inefficient and fails to protect people's natural rights. This raises a concern that the Articles of Confederation should be replaced by the new Constitution. We should ratify the Constitution to better protect people's natural rights. Amos Singletary, a Massachusetts representative, is against the ratification (Doc1).…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Confederation Weaknesses

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There are many different beliefs on how the government of the United States should be run. The first set of rules, called the Articles of Confederation, was written in 1777, but 10 years later in 1787 the Constitution was adopted. The Constitution replaced faulty laws that didn’t give the federal government supreme power; it set a base for our government that has still proven to be an effective framework for the United States to follow even 229 years later. The Articles of Confederation had many weaknesses like not holding the power to impose taxes and the need for a unanimous vote to pass an amendment, that were resolved by the enactment of the constitution and without it, America would not be the great nation it is today.…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution guards against tyranny by utilizing all three branches to keep each other in check. Each branch of government is separate, which allows them to not abuse their power and take advantage of people. Small and large states need to have one representative, as well as two senators. The three branches of government have prevented tyranny for a long time.…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The original 10th amendment from the bill of right stated that “the powers not delegated to the United States by the constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states respectively or to the people.” (cooper class notes). This amendment is now as the “States Rights”, these rights were meant to have a separation between state government and federal government, just like the separation of state and church, there needed to be a balance between level of governments. This helped the government keep a balance been them and also make sure that no American rights were being violated. In contrast the 14th amendment stated that “granted citizenship to “all persons born or naturalized in the United States,” which included former slaves recently freed.…

    • 233 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Andrew Titcomb-Morales Mrs. Holt Legal Systems 4 October 2017 The 14 amendment is that no judge or any government official can take away you rights as a person such as someone’s: life, liberty, or property. This amendment has been used many times in history as a way to back up someone’s case. There are two famous cases that has occurred over time: Plessy vs. Ferguson and Brown v Board of Education.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Under the Articles of Confederation, the government was not completely effective because of the power imbalance, the nation's needs not being met, and financial struggles. Congress did not have strength over the people to enforce laws; the citizens desired a less powerful government after the harsh rule the British government enforced on them previously. They got a weaker government, but the Congress lost its authority to rule over the states. Citizens felt that the government lacked in stability and unable to deal with the nation's problems. A military was a basic need for the states, but because of the cost, congress struggled to pay for one.…

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When The Articles of Confederation were first written, they did not give congress the power to tax citizens. This may have been good for the people, but it was not good for the government. If this problem was left until now, we wouldn’t have schools, government buildings and workers, or healthcare. The outcome would be disastrous. States had the right to coin their own money.…

    • 203 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Describe some of the principles behind the Constitution. Discuss how the separation of powers and checks and balances are supposed to operate. How did the Constitution arrange the power relationships between the national government and the states? There are several principles behind the United States constitution, such as popular sovereignty, limited government, separation of power, checks and balances, and federalism.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abstract In the modern times back in the late 18th century in the Constitution where the Founding Fathers were established the to rebuild the federal government to become more efficient than the recent government under the Article of Confederation, they were also published and ratified the ten natural rights of the citizens known as the Bill of Rights. In the Bill of Rights of the Congress, the Second Amendment, which infers that the people of the society has been entitled to have possessions of bearing weapons; although, in the modern society of today, where the amendment has become the most controversial of the Bill of Rights,as the critics came to a solution by preventing the people of the world of having…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The History of the Constitutional Convention In 1787, Congress realized that states governing themselves would leave the nation powerless when faced with another war. The United States had adopted the Articles of Confederation a decade prior, but the system wasn’t working. Each state was able to govern itself, and they didn’t have to abide by any regulations set by the federal government. The United States has a federalist government, meaning that the citizens are held to the laws of the state and the nation, but the federal government was left nearly powerless to enforce any type of authority. Congress had no way of being able to regulate commerce and no authority to emplace taxes.…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays