A Brief Summary Of The Constitution

Improved Essays
The first written Constitution of United States was the Article of Confederation written in 1777 and ratified by the states four years after. It was helpful for coordinating the War of Independence. After the War for Independence most Americans could feel the weakness of Confederation government because it wasn’t able to regulate and control as it was supposed to do; moreover, the Congress was lacking a secure source of revenue to support new economy. It was very week government, where Congress couldn’t collect taxes, no executive brunch or one national court system were exist, overall it was system lucking any national unity. With the Congress inability to act properly the states themselves started to take action to regulate on their own by imposing high taxes on farmers and other people making them going into debts and eventually all this lead to a famous Shay’s rebellion. The need for new Constitution was obvious and the last session of the Constitutional Convention took place on September 17, 1787, where the final draft was finished in order to pass new laws nine out of thirteen states were must to agree but it was not perfect and satisfying to all states and caused debates between federalists and antifederalists. …show more content…
Federalists supported the idea of one central government but Anti-Federalists opposed ratification. They argued that the republic had to be small and warned that the Constitution would result in a government of oppression. They were afraid that Constitution will not guarantee the rights of ordinary people. They pointed on the luck of a Bill of Rights in the Constitution which makes Americans unprotected of basic rights such us freedom of speech. In order for a final constitution to be proposed, a series of compromises were needed to be done. There were two main questions to address the representation question and the slavery question. So the first compromise that needed to be done was a Great Compromise, addressing the disagreement between the Virginia and New Jersey plans. Virginia plan was based on the idea that large population – state need more power than small states and New Jersey plan opposed it and proposed a plan which would give both large and small states alike equal representation in the national government. The point of a compromises was in the legislative branch and after many debates Roger Sherman finally come up with a suggestion which satisfied both sides and it was bicameral congress with House of representative based on the size of the population and senate based on the state of one vote. Next very difficult argument was regarding slavery. South who had more numbers of slaves wanted them to be included in the overall figures for the House of representative that was based on size of the population. North disagreed with this plan as they had less numbers of slaves. The compromise was based on that each slave would count as 3/5s of a person. Throughout the era of the Revolution, Americans had desire to spread and control the entire North American continent. For many years American national land policy mostly was beneficial for large companies than individual settlers. Land companies hoped to buy real estate and then by reselling those lands to the settlers. They wanted government to step aside and allow them to take control in order to help to develop West’s economy. Meanwhile settlers felt that spirit of American freedom that gives them right to take over Western lands as well. By 1800 nearly 400000 Americans occupied land on the west of Appalachian Mountains and this number was much higher than the number of Indians. The westward expansion become more feasible after the Louisiana Purchase made by President Jefferson from France in 1803- it doubled the territory of United States and many people migrate west to search for a better economic opportunities. American understanding of freedom has been changed but as whole country it was far from being a truly integrated nation. The change came after the second war for Independence of 1812 which inspired national pride and help the nation to unite. The change also happened because of westward movement of population, and finally the spread of the market revolution. By 1850 the American territories

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Sage Gurney Book Review: A More Perfect Constitution When I first realized A More Perfect Constitution by Larry J. Sabato was about rewriting the United States Constitution, I thought it was the last book I would want to read. I am glad I was required to read this book for a class, because I learned so much more than I thought I would. A More Perfect Constitution is a very well thought out and researched book.…

    • 1898 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Founding Fathers of the United States of America wanted a strong and central government that could function properly during wartime and was able define its republic character. In March 1, 1891, the Articles of Confederation were ratified by the states and was in effect. However, the under the Articles of Confederation, James Madison noticed that the country was broke not in economical means but in its structure. In 1788, the Constitution of the United States was ratified. It established a strong national government and its fundamental laws and rights that are still in effect in today's society.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution is a very significant document throughout US history. However, during the ratification of the Constitution, many people had differences in opinions. The two groups who argued over the ratification were the Federalists and Antifederalists. Federalists were the ones in favor of the new constitution’s balance of power between the states and the national government. Important members of this group were George Washington, James Madison, and Alexander Hamilton.…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They feared that that original text from the Constitution didn’t contain a bill of rights. The Federalist thought the Constitution didn’t need a bill of rights and they thought that the nation would possibly not survive without the passage from the Constitution. They also said that a stronger national government was required since the Articles of Confederation failed for not having a strong enough national…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It didn't make sense for the National Government to have more power leaving the states weak. They also believed that the power among the three branches was not equally divided. The Anti-Federalist were more for the people, more of which were farmers and small landowners. More and more the Anti-Federalist believed that the Federalist were more interested in a aristocratic society which would be at the expense of the commoners of the colonies. Now the way the Federalist won over the ratification of the Constitution was that James Madison, John Jay, and Alexander Hamilton wrote The Federalist Papers which helped convinced some people to ratify the Constitution.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The anti-federalist thought that this new document would have all the same characteristics of Great Britain the country they had fought so hard to extract themselves from and others feared that this new government threatened their personal liberties. The Anti-Federalist demanded a document that protected states rights and individual rights and eventually the Federalist made The Bill Of Rights. I am standing here today signing the ratification of the constitution because of the Federalists and Anti-Federalists making this…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the formation of the U.S. government, two different forms of government were initiated. At first, the Americans wanted to form a government that was nothing like monarchy, as they didn’t want a repeat of King George. The Articles of Confederation served as the first constitution of the United States, which was ratified in 1781. However, the Articles of Confederation had issues. The main issue was that the national government was too weak.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First Short Essay One thing was clear during the convention of 1787, there were an astonishing number of viewpoints that clashed wherever they could. The main topic for debate was the distribution of control. Who would make the decisions for the people the state government or national government? The worry was that if the state government had primary control over the people's interests, who would police them? The Federalists wanted to make sure that the state government officials did not influence political policy to further their own interests.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although the Federalist shard many of the same ideas of the Antifederalist such as individual rights (Oaks 223). The Anti-Federalists shared different view on how the government should be ran. Because of their experiences with the tyranny of Great Britain, they feared the establishment of a strong national government. The Anti-Federalists also did not accept the use of separation of powers and checks and balances, because they feared the branches of government would abuse the power and not serve the purpose of protecting the rights and freedoms of the individuals. It was evident in the way they thought things should be ran and why they thought they where right, being that they where from a old-line of republicans and did not favor a system…

    • 130 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It brought up leadership, economical and legislative issues. In conjunction with the issues it brought up, it also began to cause issues with citizens and political leaders. The Anti-Federalist party who wanted a weak central government, had strong opinions as to why they believed it was wrong for America. On the other-hand, Federalists believed a stronger central government was the best choice for the country. In the end, the Articles of Confederation were and replaced with the Constitution to satisfy both parties as much as they could.…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The federalist of the Constitution were the people who supported it. The anti-federalist were those who went against it. Federalist thought that the Constitution was based on federalism. The anti-federalist believed that the Constitution took too much power away from the states and did not insured rights for the people. The federalists even wrote essays to answer the anti-federalist attacks to the Constitution.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Anti-Federalist felt greatly upset by the Federalist ratification of the Constitution, which had shifted state power into federal hands, while the Federalists wished to keep a Bill of Rights out of the Constitution, because they believed that they could not list each right, and that the rights unstated would be broken and abused. The Federalists eventually won the ratification of the Constitution in large part because they set up the ratification process in a way that would be favorable to them. They had new conventions which were held in states that were favorable to their position first, and they required only 9 of the 13 states to ratify, although the Articles of Confederation had clearly stated that all 13 states would be required in order to agree to any amendments to the…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anti Federalists Essay

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Other people felt as if the new Constitution had no separation of powers. They felt as if the branches had too much power and there was nothing keeping one branch from becoming too powerful (Doc 2). The Anti-Federalists did not want to be in the same kind of government they fought so hard to get away from. The Anti-Federalists were also frustrated with the fact that the new Constitution laid out all the rules, but did not list any rights the people had. So Federalists came up with the Bill of Rights as a way to get the Constitution ratified.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With the realization of the problems caused Articles of Confederation, the leaders were able to come up with The Constitution which was drafted at the Constitutional Convention. The Constitution established America’s national government by explaining the fundamental laws and basic rights America would follow in order to have a well balanced government. Before the Constitution, the government could not change anything in The Articles of a Confederation which caused significant problems during Shays’ Rebellion. Shay’s Rebellion made it clear that The Articles of Confederation were not…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, the creation of a national bank would not be sufficient, as it was not stated within the Constitution. Generally speaking the Federalists had stronger support for the Constitution because they created it. Alongside this, the Anti-Federalists pledged for lower taxes, as most of them were farmers from the south. In comparison most Federalists were generally buisiness men from the north. One of the key differences between the two was the idea of a Bill of Rights.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays