Constitution As A Living Document Essay

Improved Essays
A living document is a document that can be changed and updated if needed . The Constitution is a living document and can be changed through amendments, but it takes time to be processed and approved. ( Living Document, 2017) The actual intent of the Constitution is to be “ drafted and ratified”.( Original Intent, 2017) However, currently the Constitution is being used based off its original intent. Actually, enforcing the Constitution as a living document would be beneficial to the people politically, economically, socially . While the Constitution is a living document, it is expressed as if it is being used for its original intent due to the lack of changes made since it was created. Politically the original Constitution did not discuss much on the political parties. The Constitution talks more about the Federalist and Antifederalist, when currently the biggest political parties are: Democratic and Republicans. Meanwhile, we currently base our laws and day to day actions on political parties and perspectives so the Constitution should reflect that . The Constitution should be something that changes as time changes and that's not what's being enforce. Taking that time has changed, the overall political outlook has changed and the Constitution has not been updated to reflect those …show more content…
(Worth, 2015) The Constitutions discusses how congress basically has the power to negotiate commerce between foreign nations and within the country itself. ( Constitution Economy, 2017) The Constitution has given congress too much power because the amount of taxes being taken from citizens aren't used properly. Congress is basing its outlook of money from the original outlook on the constitution and not the current situations our country is in. Since the Constitution has not changed we are in debt and will continue to be in more debt and taxes will

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Congress decided their current form of government, the Articles of Confederation, had many flaws. It was too weak to stop things such as Shay’s Rebellion. Because of this they organized a convention, many state representatives showed up, but some did not because they were pleased with how it was and didn’t want to change this. The people who were against changing the Articles of Confederation are called Anti-Federalists, and people that were for this are called Federalists. As a Federalist I believe the people of the United States should ratify the Constitution because we would fall to pieces without it.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution guards against tyranny by utilizing all three branches to keep each other in check. Each branch of government is separate, which allows them to not abuse their power and take advantage of people. Small and large states need to have one representative, as well as two senators. The three branches of government have prevented tyranny for a long time.…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalists and Anti-Federalists The feud between the Federalist and Anti-Federalist party was based on the ratification of the Constitution. Even though both groups believed that the principal purpose of government is to secure individual rights and that the best instrument for that purpose is some form of limited republican government. They also agreed that the individual has the right to do anything that the government has no power to keep him from doing.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Court cases have helped to expand Federal power between the time the Constitution was established and modern day. Some people claim that due to these cases, Congress has gained too much power, and that their powers now far exceed those specified in the Constitution. Others clamor for an even stronger Federal Government that holds even more powers. Those who think that Congress have too much power do have a point; the Constitution specifically laid out the powers that would be given to the overarching Federal Government.…

    • 227 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the year 1787, there were two major different political parties that were involved in the ratification of the American Constitution. The Federalist and the Anti-Federalist; they both had very strong views regarding the welfare of the country and its citizens. The Federalist who wanted to impose a stronger government had the greatest ideas and impact on the ratification of the American’s Constitution. They didn’t want the idea of having any loose interpretation of anything, they wanted everything to be clear and done by the book, they were afraid that if anything was left up to interpretation, America would face many challenges, and would never be a whole as it is right now, and surely would lose its freedom.…

    • 1772 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    How is the Constitution written to guarantee that the government will be, and forever remain, limited in power? The Constitution was written upon the six principles to ensure our government would forever be with limited power to protect the United States of America. A limited government is a political system that legalized force is restricted to enumerated powers. The idea of a limited government is related to political thinkers, who used a unique way of showing emphasis to prevent government from having all power. Some wanted to connect divine law and natural law; others wanted a social compact to establish the government, to protect property and natural rights.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There is no denying that the United States Constitution is a living document, that is in itself the foundation by which this country is to be governed. No matter ones position on contemporary and pressing social, economic and political issues, the Constitution is the guide and standard. Unfortunately, as a living document, it is open to interpretation by those who seek to use it to suit their purpose. For example, even preceding the 21st Century, the historical document has been used as a weapon, with the user selecting the pieces that best suit their case, similar to using one verse from the bible to make a case when in reality it has been taken out of context.…

    • 1634 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As a document written many years ago, it has been interpreted in different ways, which makes it a living document. “The proper role of the Supreme Court, it is said, is to interpret the Constitution, not rewrite it” (Shaman, 2001). As a living document “We the People” attempt to use the words of the constitution to benefit us, both in a negative and positive manner. Past, present, and the future pose a disadvantage to the written constitution. Attempting to change the Constitution of the United States will take a long process and time, therefore interpreting the constitution makes it easier for the…

    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Confederation and Constitution After fighting the British in the Revolutionary War, our new independent nation faced some difficult and challenging times economically. This critical time was a danger to colonists and the new future of the delicate republic. Independence had been declared and the recent state and national governments needed to make some very difficult decisions about how to stabilize the suffering economy (Ushistory.org, 2016). Articles of Confederation vs Constitution on 1787 As a result, the Articles of Confederation was drafted in 1777 under the direction of John Dickenson from Pennsylvania (DeVry University, 2016).…

    • 2111 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Describe some of the principles behind the Constitution. Discuss how the separation of powers and checks and balances are supposed to operate. How did the Constitution arrange the power relationships between the national government and the states? There are several principles behind the United States constitution, such as popular sovereignty, limited government, separation of power, checks and balances, and federalism.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The situation in question is the status of the Constitution 's life, or lack thereof. Is it a living document, or is it dead? That is, should it be interpreted differently, according to the times, or interpreted precisely as it was intended to be when written? This question is hotly debated throughout politics, as its answer can determine how crucial legal…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution has been described as a living document because of the changes which have taken place since its conception by our founding fathers. No right or freedom is absolute. While we tout this as one of the great selling points of our country they are not without their restrictions. For example, the First Amendment which covers freedom of religion, speech, and the right to assemble peacefully all have some kind of limitation on them.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution today is a symbolism of American. It shows how we broke away from British rules and formed our own type of government. The Constitution is held proud in American and is essential because it shows documentation of what our rights and liberties are. The Founding Fathers motives in creating the constitution were to create a more democratic society. For example limiting the power of government insuring we all have domestic tranquility, and ways to create a unbiased government.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Technology has changed, the international situation has changed, the economy has changed, and social mores have changed, all in ways that no one could have thought of when the Constitution was drafted. In fact, the people who thought of the idea of a living constitution have stated their arguments so strongly that, among people who write about constitutional law, the term "the living constitution" is hardly ever used. The Constitution is supposed to be a solid foundation, the embodiment of our most fundamental principles-that's the whole idea of having a constitution. If the Constitution is not constant, if it changes from time to time, then someone is changing it, and doing so according to his or her own ideas about what the Constitution should…

    • 203 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some things that Congress has the power to do are: Collect taxes, print and borrow money, declare war, set up federal courts, propose amendments to the Constitution, control commerce, and accept or reject foreign treaties. Congress also has the power to do a pocket veto, which means that if they send a bill to the President he either has 10 days to return it to them vetoed or it is as if it were signed. If the President does send a bill back that has been vetoed, Congress has the power to override the veto with a 2/3 vote. Congress however cannot: Pass ex post facto law, Pass bill of attainder, grant titles of nobility, or suspend writ of habeas corpus which protects citizens from illegal…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays