Constantine And Charlemagne's Rule Of Rome

Improved Essays
Constantine and Charlemagne are arguably two of the greatest Christian emperors to ever rule the Roman Empire. While these men reigned almost five centuries apart, they shared certain ambitions and personality traits that simultaneously made them effective leaders and caused them significant problems. Neither Constantine nor Charlemagne was born "destined" to be an emperor. Although Constantine's father rose to the rank of Augustus, Diocletian's tetrarchy was not set up to facilitate dynastic rule. Charlemagne, on the other hand, was born into a royal family—but one whose members had begun ruling as mere "mayors of the palace," evolved into kings, and would never have imagined themselves becoming "emperors" before the days of Charlemagne himself.

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Throughout history, there have been many great leaders with very different styles of commanding. Some of these methods, while unorthodox, benefited the land’s people, the land’s economy, and people’s spirituality. In Rome, there were two powerful leaders who approached the throne differently: Gaius Octavius, “Augustus” and Flavius Valerius Aurelius Constantinus Augustus, “Constantine”. Both of these men inspired changes for the Roman Empire, such as: political reforms, spiritual reforms, and social reforms. This paper will discuss which of the two men should have been deemed the true “Augusti”.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After Diocletian’s reign ended in 315 AD, there was a fight for imperial power over the Roman Empire. Diocletian had created a tetrarchy, but now the men fighting for the imperial office wanted to have sole power of the empire instead of having other men rule with him. Constantine the Great and Maxentius would turn out to be the main attackers for the position. Maxentius had power over Italy from defeating Galerius, and Constantine had control over the upper Roman Empire of Gaul and Britain. Unfortunately, Constantine was the brother-in-law of Maxentius, but this did not stop them from being top enemies during the civil war for power.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Notker and Einhard both wrote accounts about Charlemagne, titled "The Life of Charlemagne. " They both respected him as a Christian and leader of the Franks, however they take an alternate point of view on him. Einhard actually knew Charlemagne, and displays him as a three-dimensional, reasonable individual, with numerous achievements a few failings. Notker considers him to be a legend that he took in of from his older folks, overwhelming and larger than life. Einhard laid out his life story logically,as a kind of historical record of Charles’ life, while Notker put together more of a collection of anecdotes.…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Our comparative essay will focus on ancient leaders, Constantine and Charlemagne. Both individuals established themselves as notable leaders. They both made strides to further the causes of those that they led. I will attempt to highlight common themes of both rulers. Were they similar or different?…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Constantine’s reign was not only eventful, but it was also highly dramatic. While Constantine’s father succeeded Augustus’ rank, Constantine had served under the distinction under both Diocletian and Galerius. He was then allowed to join his father in Britain and assisted him in a campaign against the Picts. When Constantine’s father died he returned back to Augusta Treverorum, which served as his residence for the next six years.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Religion is a set of beliefs held by a group of people that help a person develop a strong moral character in order to do good deeds. It was an important factor that played a major role in the Roman Empire. While Diocletian eliminated all Christians due to their religious differences, Galerius and Constantine issued the Edict of Tolerations to protect them. Even though the Romans believed the rise of Christianity posed a threat to society, people started to change their beliefs when they gain different experiences about this new religion. During the first four centuries, Christianity was originally rejected though it promoted peace among people and helped spread the teachings of Jesus Christ to non-believers.…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Charlemagne did more for his people and wanted them to live life just like him. He was a family man who loved his children and wanted what was best for…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Charlemagne’s legacy is one that has well exceeded his life. He gained enormous respect with his military victories and eventually deemed the Emperor of the Romans. Although he is known as “Charles the Great” for his military successes, there is evidence of the type of person and character he was well. Charlemagne also known as Karl was very interested in learning and education. He wanted to spread education throughout his empire.…

    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Historical texts are often respected for their informational objectivity whereas art is revered for its visual and philosophical subjectivity. In respect to both historical texts and artistic vision one must be able to differentiate what is perceived and what is accurate. Eusebius’ Life of Constantine is a biography depicting the rule of the late Roman emperor Constantine, exercises offered by Peter Jenny’s The Artist’s Eye uses art as an exploratory aide to decipher a more profound meaning to the text than what meets the untrained eye. When comparing Jenny’s exercise of Constellations in Chapter 7 to Eusebius’ biography there must be a connection between the two texts, an understanding of the biography in its intended form, and an analysis…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    One event that lead to the Great Schism was when the Byzantine Empire split with Roman Catholicism. At this time, Pope Leo III crowned Charlemagne, King of the Franks, as Holy Roman Emperor in 800 CE. From the Byzantine viewpoint, this outraged Empress Irene and the Byzantine Empire itself, as the empire felt that she was a strong and capable ruler to govern; however, Pope Leo III had the opposite view, partly because she was a woman. Charlemagne’s crowning made the Byzantine Emperor redundant, and relations between the east and the west deteriorated until a formal split occurred in 1054. The division between the east and west came about when Cerularius, the patriarch of Constantinople, desired to acknowledge the Byzantine control of the Church.…

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two lives of Charlemagne is a book that has the writings of two people that wrote about the life of Charlemagne. The first person was a man named Einhard who wrote a biography of Charlemagne’s life. The second was Notker the Stammerer who wrote about the deeds of Charlemagne. The writings from Einhard and Notker combine to make the book Two lives of Charlemagne. The text will focus on six ideals from the text.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    After the fall of the Roman Empire in the late 5th century, the eastern Byzantine Empire flourished while the western regions disintegrated into fragmented kingdoms without any unifying authority. Europe was in the midst of its Dark Ages when Charlemagne was born in 742 AD. This time was marked by frequent warfare; therefore there were few cultural achievements during this time. Charlemagne became ruler of one kingdom in Germany in 768 AD, immediately setting out to expand his territory. Through numerous battles, he had conquered most of inland Europe.…

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Charles the Great, also known as Charlemagne, ruled between the years of 768 and 814 CE. Einhard, a friend of Charlemagne, considers him the greatest king of the middle ages. Still, what characteristics does Einhard consider great, and how are those traits manifested in Charlemagne? Using Einhard’s work, The Life of Charlemagne, we can gleam insight into what made Charlemagne so great, as well as what is the mark of a great medieval king. Einhard, documents how Charlemagne was a great general, a friend of The Church, and a supporter of education.…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The document reinforces Charlemagne’s powerful, effective, respected status as a Christian warrior by testifying and listing the several victories Charlemagne won. For example, the document includes accounts of his efficient conquest and defeat of the Bretons, the Barbarians, the Welatabians, the Sorabians, the Abodriti, the Bohemians, and his victory in the Saxon War, Bohemian and Linonian wars, and Danes. The multiple forces that tried to rebel, to reject, or to uprise against Charles’ dominion were subdued into obedience/submission using hostages and embassies. For example, in Charles’ defeat of Duke Tassilo in the Bavarian war, Tassilo was forced to surrender himself to Charles, “give him the hostages he demanded, [including his own son Theodo], and promised by oath not to give ear to anyone who should [rebel against Charles’ allegiance].” Additionally, the document even includes relics of people who willingly surrendered to Charlemagne’s rule, such as some barbarous German tribes between the Rhine and the Vistula.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The book Two Lives of Charlemagne contains two different biographies of Charles the great or “Charlemagne”, who was king of Franks from 771-814 A.D. The first biography is titled “The Life Of Charlemagne” and is written by Einhard. The second biography is titled “Charlemagne” and is authored by Notker the Stammerer. Both biographies of Charlemagne are classical medieval literature, but they differ in their points of view and focus. Einhard mostly talked about the actual life of Charlemagne, the key political decisions, wars he was in, and the projects he’d been working on to help improve the society in his kingdom. Walahfrid Strabo states that “Einhard was one of the most highly thought of among all the palace officials of that time, not…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays