Consequentialism Vs Utilitarianism

Improved Essays
Through the course of philosophy 210, we have been exposed to many different theories that reward one aspect on what morality. The most recent one, Ross theory of right conduct, which gives a very different aspect on morality as the past theories. In this paper, it will be explain and review Ross theory of right conduct, how it differs from all the other theories, and how we can apply it. The main difference between Ross theory of right conduct and the previously viewed moral theories, such as consequentialism and utilitarianism, is that amount of pleasure is not the entire thing use to judge for what is morally right to do. The amount of pleasure is one aspect of Ross theory to decide what the right thing to do is, however pleasure is not …show more content…
Ross explains that each prima facie is equal to each other, there is no hierarchy between each prima facies. The first prima facie is the duty of fidelity. This prima facie indicates we have a duty to do what we promise. In other words, to follow all the promises we made. For example; if you promises your friend to have lunch this Friday with him, then you have a duty to see him on Friday. The second prima facie is the duty of gratitude. We have a duty to return favors and/or to express gratitude for the help we received. For example; if your roommate helps you out with a project, then you have a duty to return the favor when he needs it. The third prima facie is duty of reparation. We have a duty to fix all the problems we made and bad things we have done to others. For example; if you break your sister’s phone, you have a duty to buy her a new one. The forth prima facie is the duty of justice. The duties we have to be fair and as equal to others as much possible, especially when dealing with distribution of things. For example, treating every student equal and not showing a preference to a particular student because you have known him in the past. The fifth prima facie is the duty of beneficence. This is the duty all consequentialists will agree for, because it tell us to provide as much happiness as possible to others. For example; if you know that your wife enjoys sweets a lot, then it is your duty to give her sweets occasionally. The sixth prima facie is the duty of self-improvement. This dictates that we have a duty to find ways to improve ourselves. An example of this could be, going to the gym to get in good physical condition. The seventh and final prima facie is the duty of non-maleficence. This strongly implies on we have the duty to not bring any type of pain to others. An example of this duty can be the following; you have a duty to not make fun of your brother’s weight, because he has self-esteem

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In chapter 9 of James Rachels and Stuart Rachels The Elements of Moral Philosophy, the authors elaborate on the philosophical question, whether there are absolute moral rules. In order to illustrate the philosophical moral question, Rachels uses President Harry Truman’s dilemma on the use of atomic bombs to end World War II and in the process comes in contact with Elizabeth Anscombe, a 20th century foremost philosophical champion of the doctrine that moral rules are absolute, the theory of categorical imperative, Kant’s arguments on lying to make the case on moral judgments. First, the Rachels’ use President Harry Truman’s encounter with Elizabeth Anscombe, a 20th century foremost philosophical champion of the doctrine that…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The most recent Presidential election in the United States recently came to a wrap, widely being considered one of the most ridiculous elections of all time. When it was announced that the two Presidential finalists were Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, people all around the world were shocked. With Donald Trump having no experience in politics, and Hillary Clinton previously having been in a political position, but landing herself in hot water for deleting thousands of emails, it seemed that America was almost certainly doomed. With the controversial nature of the candidates, many America citizens decided to remove themselves from the equation completely by not voting at all. If I was an American citizen, I would have done the same thing.…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Margaret Austin Professor Otto October 20, 2015 Guided Comparative Essay Ethics, the moral understanding that someone has a behavior towards. Utilitarian is the ethics of something that is right or wrong that is than assessed for a consequence. Bentham and Mill both have a different but similar opinion on utilitarianism. They both have the notion that utilitarianism is about the mind and body or the pain and pleasure we mankind endure.…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This applies today even more now than ever because of the social media sites where people can openly post their thoughts. Yet, people do not realize these posts can never be deleted and there is always proof left behind. A third duty is to speak in a way that is not hateful towards others. Hate speech about any racial, sexual, threatening, or religious biases is not acceptable and can be punished if it harms others. All these duties if not followed can lead to very negative or harmful…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    W.D. Ross trusted that there was not one standard or rule that one must comply with. Rather he trusted that we can advance through good obligations. Ross suggested that we have plainly obvious at first sight moral obligations and that there are a few things have inborn worth. He trusted we have the obligation of loyalty or the obligation to stay faithful to our commitments, the obligation of reparation or the obligation to pay for mischief done to others, the obligation of appreciation or the obligation to return supports, the obligation of value or the obligation to boost the great, and the obligation of non-damage or the obligation to deny mischief to others. For instance, it is for the most part wrong to execute a man in light of the fact…

    • 222 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is not always permissible to harm a smaller number of people to prevent harm to a large number of people. There are many different scenarios that can be used to provided evidence as to why the answer could be yes or no. I justify my answer with ethical logic and emotional appeal. If I am driving in a car and my brakes won’t work and I am about to hit a minivan full of 12 people. I can choose to hit the van or swerve and hit and kill a mother and her newborn child on the sidewalk.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Virtuous character and good actions Every one has their own philosophy, so do Kant and Aristotle. This paper will examine the difference in Kant’s and Aristotle’s philosophy in three ways. First, the way the major criterion they used to judge an action as good or bad. Second, what is considered to be good actions and the concept of perfect duties.…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The purpose of this essay will be to examine a complex moral case through the lens of the theories of Classical Act Utilitarianism and Rule Consequentialism. The theories will be compared and evaluated based on how they apply to the moral case. The situation that will ultimately be the basis to compare Classical Act Utilitarianism (AU) and Rule Consequentialism (RC), is the story of Jim. During a trip to South Africa, Jim finds himself to be a little lost and disoriented and in the wrong small town. Jim notices that in the middle of the town’s center square there are 20 Indian tied up against a wall, all in a row and supervised by uniformed men.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Utilitarianism Essay

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As the protectors of the citizen’s of the United States, the FBI felt they were obligated to access the data on Syed Farook, one of the San Bernardino terrorists through any means necessary, even by force. They believed that information such as motives or possible accomplices may be hidden on the iPhone 5C and access to that will potentially allow them to capture other perpetrators or perhaps even prevent future terror attacks. After two months of failing to gain access to the iPhone in question, the FBI appealed to the courts of California and they were successful in gaining an order which demanded that Apple build a backdoor in their software to disable the erase-after-ten-failed-attempts feature (erases all contents of an iPhone after ten…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Utilitarianism believes acts are morally permissible if it causes the greatest happiness, or the least unhappiness for people. For topics such as suicide, euthanasia, and abortion, a utilitarian believes that the end justifies the means. If more people would be happy and less unhappy with the even happening, then the event is morally permissible. Natural law believes that the right to life is a right that is also a duty, that life is a gift with definite restrictions and responsibilities attached. Man is obligated to live out his life to the end of its natural span.…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Subsequent to Aristotle’s ancient centered view of ethics, that has a focal point of virtue ethics, which defined ethics in a person’s character development, and a broad picture of human life. Modern ethics emerged two-thousand years later. Modern ethics believes morality is based on the action a person takes rather than a person’s character. Overall, modern ethics give us two “act base theories” the Kantianism and Utilitarianism, both define ethics in a form of action. In this paper I will be discussing the beliefs of Kantianism.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because rule utilitarianism relies on moral rules to determine the permissibility of actions, it has the resources to avoid the problems act utilitarianism faces concerning individual rights by establishing rules that prohibit infringement of individual rights. For instance, one should not enslave others because, in most instances, slavery has more negative outcomes than not enslaving others. Therefore if not enslaving others was a rule, rule utilitarianism would consider all slavery immoral, regardless if individual cases of slavery would yield more good outcomes. In more instances than not, violating individual rights results in a lower utility, therefore, the majority of moral rules align with our individual rights and intuitive moral verdicts. Thus, rule utilitarianism has the resources to prohibit the problems that act utilitarianism faces concerning infringement of individual rights.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Tort Law

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The first element is known as the “duty of care.” A duty of care arises when the law recognizes a relationship between two parties, and in this relationship, one party has a legal obligation to act in a certain manner toward the other. The second element is a breach of the duty of care. A person or entity (such as a business or government agency) breaches the duty of care by not exercising reasonable care in fulfilling the duty. The third element is causation.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Utilitarian and Deontological Discussion of Abortion Today, abortion has become a heavily debated topic whether socially or politically since the medical procedure was voted legal by the Supreme Court over 40 years ago. It is defined as the purposeful termination of a pregnancy before a normal childbirth (Abortion: Get Facts About the Procedure and Statistics). Whether you find yourself agreeing with it or not, many people have something to say. Abortion is very controversial because of the discussion whether or not a fetus is a person. Many wonder if there is a morally relevant point at some duration throughout the pregnancy or development of the fetus that could justify having an abortion or possibly not having an abortion.…

    • 1747 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The theory of Utilitarianism is very vulnerable to criticism due to its reliance on vague underlying principles that leave many questions unanswered. The Utilitarianism ideology is grounded in three simple propositions. First off, actions are solely deemed right if they result in the best consequences. Secondly, the only way consequences are assessed are by how much happiness and unhappiness they cause.…

    • 148 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays