Consensual Contact Vs Probable Cause Analysis

Improved Essays
In the criminal justice system, such things as consensual contact, detention and probable cause are important to for law enforcement. To know the difference between each could be difference between enforcing the law and letting someone go. According to Robertson and Wallace, consensual contact is defined as when an individual is not detained by the police and the police have not had any manner recommend to that individual and is not free to end the encounter and withdraw from. There are two types of detentions. Terry-Type Detention is defined as an arrest from a stop-and-frisk situation, while Temporary Detention is defined for questioning that is not considered to be an arrest. Lastly, probable cause is defined as a quality by police authorities …show more content…
A vehicle is less than a full arrest and the level of it, is that probable cause supports a temporary detention less than required to a full arrest. The detention starts when the officer is coming to a vehicle that is stopped. As soon as the officer turns on his red lights, is not a detention whether if the vehicle is already parked, and the officer gets out to ask the driver for his or her identification or license. Detention needs to have a reasonable suspicion if the person doing criminal activity, is about to occur in a criminal activity, or has been recently been doing criminal activity. “People v. Remiro, a state appellate court upheld the stopping of the vehicle on the basis of the officer’s reasonable suspicion. In the case, the officer saw a van he did not recognize that was driving slowly in a residential neighborhood at 1:30 a.m. The officer followed the van and noticed that it was traveling in a circle”. The van was stopped for the following reasons: the van was speeding, the police officer knew the neighborhood, knew about each vehicle and the patterns, but he did not recognize this vehicle. The police officer had known that there were burglaries that have been occurred in that neighborhood. Lastly, he knew that vans are usually used for …show more content…
If you are pulled over, trying to figure out if the police officer has any probable cause to legally search you, you will always have the right to decline any appeals by saying, “Officer, I don’t consent to any searches.”. You can say this to the officer, over and over again if you please too. If the officers finds something illegal in your car, without having a warrant, you can get a lawyer and show the evidence in court. The Terry Case was big in the United States Supreme Court back on October 31, 1963. Two men, John W. Terry and Richard Clinton were stopped by detective Martin McFadden. The officer stopped the two men because he felt like were acting in a suspicious way. Terry and Richard were walking back and forth near a window that they kept staring at and soon later met up with another guy, Katz. They had a short conversation and then Katz left. The two men walked a couple blocks meeting up with Katz, but the officer followed them as the guys were together. The officer went up to the three men and asked them for their names and Terry mumbled something under their breathe and officer McFadden spun him around, feeling a weapon, that was a pistol under his overcoat. The officer reached into his overcoat but was unable to get the gun out of his pocket. He then, ordered all of the three men to go inside the store and demanded them to be facing against the wall,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Probable cause, holds a belief given by facts and more of concrete evidence of a crime. For example, police need reasonable suspicion to stop and frisk and individual. While, in probable cause must exist if the police obtain a search warrant. However, Law enforcement officers do not have to have justification to stop someone on a public street to ask questions. Under the Fourth Amendment; individuals are…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The court also had to justified was an officer or the community in any kind of harm's way in the attempt to subdue or detained the suspect. There was no weapon found when investigating the case. Was the rest more important than the individual…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Police Arrest

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Police officers are not obligated to arrest every single violator of criminal law. They get to make the decision on if they want to arrest the suspected individual or not. In other words the term arrest means to take an individual into custody and they do not have the option to leave. There are many factors that could affect the decision of the arrest. The two most essential factors that help determine whether the police should make the arrest are first, is to determine the seriousness of the suspects offense and second, determining the quality of the specific evidence that is used against the suspected individual.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Walking While Black

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the case of Terry v. Ohio the Supreme Court ruled that reasonable suspicion is sufficient enough for a police officer to briefly stop and question an individual for weapons. Reasonable suspicion must not be based on off a ‘hunch’ rather than making reasonable suspicion based off experience (Feder, 2012 pg. 2). If someone is “driving while black”, the color of their skin is not reasonable suspicion to stop and question someone. However, if the driver clearly saw the officers and immediate changed his or her behavior in some way, that could be reasonable suspicion to stop and question them and search their car.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Consent searches are when the suspect gives permission to be searched. Exigent circumstances are okay only when ca officer feels it was an emergency then no probable cause or warrant is needed. Stop and frisk searches are when the cops believe they are dealing with a dangerous person. Plain view searches is whe something illegal is right there in plain view of the officer to be used a evidence while making an arrest during a crime scene. Open field searches are when the open field and pastures are not protected by the constitution can be searched.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arrest warrants are issued to allow the police to identify and locate a person, or persons. These persons are usually those who have been previous arrest, released on bail, but then fail to show up to court after their release, in contrast a search warrant allows the police to enter into a promise, in search of evidence or contraband that may be used in an upcoming trial. In order to take possession of an item, and that property to be searched it must be specifically listed in the search warrant. The police are limited to only what is indicated in the warrant after its approved by a judge. ( John Worrall.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This means that the officer should not start with exerting violence to the suspected party. Precisely, the officer should judge the situation not by the look of the case but the truth of the situation. It is factual that not every scenario of domestic violence calls for detention of the offender. In some cases, the offender might be warned on the consequences of committing the offense again. Thus, the officer should consider the applicable law enforcement strategy to solve the dispute in this case.…

    • 1615 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mistaken Identity Analysis

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages

    What Will is not directly saying is the police will see one thing and hear one thing; you are black and everything that comes out of your mouth is a lie. Carlton who has no experience with the police, tells Will he’s pre-law and knows exactly what to do, but when the police officers interrogate, Will gives broad answers while Carlton gives detailed ones. Carlton believes the police officers will let them go by telling the truth and their social status, but is turned around when the police officers accuse them of stealing the car. Once they’re bailed out of jail, Carlton tells Will the police were just doing their jobs and if they had only brought a map they wouldn’t have been put in jail. Will reveals to Carlton his single…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before the questioning starts, the suspect has the right to receive legal advice from their lawyer or from a solicitor on duty or from the Defence Solicitor Call Centre (DSCC) if they cannot afford legal aid . The PACE Code C section 11.1 highlights the caution that every interview proceeded by the police should take place in the police station. Hereby, the police 's limitation is that the suspect can refuse to answer questions by the police outside the police station. The most challenging is the right of silence that might restrict the police to gain evidence relevant to the suspect 's mental state. The Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 constitutes that a suspect has the right to not answer questions before, during and after the interview.…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If a friend or family member is steering the car from the passenger seat, they can be prosecuted for a DUI. As long as the car is not moving in any way, the law does not consider you to be driving the vehicle. What Types of DUI Cases Occur? There are different ways that an officer can make an arrest without seeing you drive the vehicle. Some of the situations include: A different driver called 911 to say that a car is weaving on the road.…

    • 1256 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays