Shakespeare uses character’s guilt to develop alter egos within each one of them, which corrupts their lives and acts like a magnet, pulling other characters with them as they fall. In each play, characters express on multiple occasions, and at various periods during their guilt epidemics, their grief and awe at the utter destruction their guilty consciences have precipitated. As Macbeth’s condition progresses, he refers to his conscience as a “dagger of the mind” (Cauchi 337). Macbeth, recognizing the controlling effect that his mental and physical state has on him, is still unable to escape it’s debilitating grasp. In the same way, Hamlet …show more content…
And, although Hamlet is able to realize his own fall, his honor and loyalty to his father prevent him from attempting to escape his insanity (Terry 1). All of Hamlet’s hope becomes lost as he realizes that achieving a comfortable future is inexorable without involving grim revenge. “It is this attempt both to please the state and God and to remain honorable that leads to Hamlet's crisis of conscience and, ultimately, to his tragic death”(Terry 1). On the other hand, Claudius’ realization that his guilty conscience has overtaken his ability to function comes later in Act III Scene III, in his soliloquy.
A similarity that Macbeth and Hamlet share is the involvement of character soliloquies. Macbeth and Claudius both relate their struggles and mental disabilities to their failing consciences during their monologues. Each character’s soliloquy is derived from guilt, and each expresses the character’s moral dilemma and concerns regarding judgment, angels and ultimately heaven or damnation (Cauchi 336). Macbeth battles with his emotions in his soliloquy