Cons Of Corporate Social Responsibility

Great Essays
By engaging in misleading CSR practices, companies can obviate the need for government regulation. Several corporations tend to engage in unethical behavior such as child labor, polluting the environment, or exploiting third world countries. Because of the increasing amount of socially aware consumers, companies can no longer partake in such nefarious activity. A variety of corporations would rather continue the dirty work they are doing because it is cheaper and more beneficial for their self-interest. In order to keep doing whatever they already do, companies use corporate social responsibility as a marketing strategy to fool the government. “Companies argue that setting minimum standards stops innovation,” the author explains, “that you …show more content…
According to the author of “Why Companies Can No Longer Afford to Ignore their Social Responsibilities,” “70% of young Millennials, those ages 18 to 26, say a company’s commitment to the community has an influence on their decision to work there” (68). This furthers the argument of how CSR can allow people to truly do something they enjoy and can let employees/consumers positively impact society. Employees and the audience of a company can feel good about themselves if they support companies who promote good for the community. However, it is evident that corporate social responsibility is mostly used to help provide advantages to the company rather than to actually help the people. A company’s self interest is always prioritized. CSR is only used as a way to make consumers believe that they are helping society. The final accomplishment businesses wish to complete is a big bottom line. Additionally, companies don’t really help out communities, they only pretend to. By using intelligent marketing strategies and launching very inefficient campaigns, consumers can be easily fooled and fail to analyze a company’s true motives. In “What’s Wrong with Corporate Social Responsibility?: The Arguments against CSR,” the author remarks that, “Since few customers closely scrutinize a company’s ethical claims, …show more content…
It is crucial to understand the way CSR works and how it is only an approach to make money. For years, the people have been deceived and they do not even realize that they are preyed upon by big corporations who are in the pursuit of profit. Consumers live in a capitalistic country where businesses dominate the economy and play the government like monopoly. People can no longer afford to ignore the real intentions that companies have because they are being unfairly taken advantage of and are only lead to believe that they are helping. Once people understand the importance of the scam that CSR is, companies can no longer harm the environment or the community. If consumers do not comprehend the relevance of stopping CSR, then people will continue to be exploited, the environment will be critically endangered, and the rest of the world will fall under the influence of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Friedman and Social Responsibility of Business Introduction Milton Friedman believed and argued that business people take care of the responsibilities that affect them in their day to day life. However, they don't care the impact their businesses have on the society so long as their market is growing and increasing their profits. The main reason why he argued this is because believing in a reduced impact that the government has and a free-market. He found that government solutions to problems are no better because its solutions are even worse than the problem itself. As a result of his belief, he believed that the government should keep off the businesses activities because of its greed and the quest of people to have access to power.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Again, there is no way for an average executive to know this. If someone ignores these warnings and attempts to give back to the community to gain some goodwill for their company, they would only be acting short sighted. Friedman says that this kind of behavior only reinforces the idea that the pursuit of profit is wrong and immoral, even when fair pursuit of profit is what a business is meant for (Friedman,…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Everything materialistic eventually loses value. We are bullied into handing our hard earned money to companies that are making a fortune by strategically manipulating people to believe that their product is a must-buy when in reality, majority of the time, the product becomes useless shortly after being purchased. We are the problem in overconsumption and we need to be aware of this. It's not needed, we may think we need it or we may want the latest invention or trend that's in style but that will not produce happiness. Overconsumption is an addiction, influenced by the greediness of modern society.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rather than follow strict regulations, companies often times devote “…an inordinate amount of time trying to navigate around the regulations without actually violating them” (Verschoor 2004, 21). Ergo, opponents could respond to the idea of a government office for accountable lobbying with the notion that corporate executives will simply find a way to circumvent said office; or, in the case of increased rights for citizens to sue corporations, that companies will simply expand and improve their legal teams. Regulations can lead corporations to focus on evading responsibility rather than accepting it. However, if the general public abandoned the “business as usual” view of state-corporate relations, there would be increased societal pressure for corporations to act in an ethically responsible manner. Much of the apathy among the general public would turn into political fervor if the immoral activities of corporations were made transparent and denounced publicly (Eabrasu 2012,…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They are focused on maximum wealth, not the individual. It is great for the economy, but in the case of a person’s well-being, it is not the best. Insurance companies, run by corporations, are in charge of a person’s life, someone who has a family, a life can be torn up and thrown away, because some greedy person wanted to save a piece of green paper. A piece of paper, well torn up jeans, rules our lives, rules the world. We as humans are willing to ruin families and will not bat an eyelash, because they may not meet the requirements for insurance.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    While aspiring to create a “better” economy, morality is placed on the side burner in the world of advertising. “The desire and the appeal for a “healthy economy” has led many companies and governments to put aside the necessary moral responsibilities in the age of the global market” (Sesana). Without using moral values to reign in the boundaries of advertising, it allows big money to be spent in the wrong place that gives off false images. Competition in the advertising business will also polarize companies’ false images. Slowly the distortion will get larger and larger if action is not taken to stop…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, things are not that simple, so regulations should be enacted to narrow the income inequality gap. This would be best for the common American and the American dream. Not every large corporation is corrupted by greed; however, the ones that are corrupted by greed pose as a threat to the common American and the American dream. These greedy corporations threaten the success of small businesses by allowing less opportunity to exist, and they do not treat their employees fairly. As a result, new regulations should be enforced to protect the average American.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This is similar to the greed many encounter in the scientific community when they try to establish a name for themselves and breakdown the purpose of the scientific method. Greed is an issue among businesses due to the nature of our capitalist economy. These dangers are something that I will need to steer clear of in my future, despite wanting to be economically…

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The populists wanted to attack this because they saw the flaws in their rhetoric, and knew ultimately the workers were not most important, but profit and gains were paramount. It’s exploitative and manipulative on account of the corporations. They’ve also managed to perpetuate the negatives of an economic system in which it is nearly impossible to leave, because reverting to a way of life that is based on being totally self-sustaining is unrealistic. And while at this point there is obviously no return, constricting the size and control these corporations have, not just over the government or the market, but also over their employees, is critical in maintaining capitalism that is in the best interests of the…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Monopolies make happy companies, which are so, for different reasons. The different reasons are generated from the uniqueness of each company with regard to their market offerings. More competition according to Thiel & Masters is like more war and the result is that there is no gain. Every single startup should seek that uniqueness that shall help it drive the monopoly agenda, if the probability of making it in the market is…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays