Conflicting Views On Animals And Suffering

There are conflicting positions. Peter Singer thinks should be given equal consideration to animals than humans in matters of suffering.
Regarding animal research, there are several positions, either to justify or to reject). Under a position, it is justified by the supposed benefit to humans since it has a preference for evolutionary, philosophical or religious reasons. From another point of view it is considered that all animal research is a moral dilemma: while the use of animals is required to meet imperative to cure and prevent disease, it also means that they are treated in ways that are morally wrong. This is done by looking for the means to replace and reduce the number of animals and reduce their suffering it constitutes a priority. …show more content…
It considers that animal research also helps other animals. For example, vaccines for parvovirus in dogs and feline leukemia in cats were made possible by animal testing. Animal research has also provided methods to rescue endangered