Conflict Theory And Gender Inequality

Decent Essays
Conflict theory sees society as a dynamic unit constantly changing as a result of competing for scarce resources. Social order is kept by power and control; those with wealth and power try to hold on to it; mainly by overpowering the poor and powerless. Inequality lasts because those who control the unbalanced portion of society’s supplies; forcefully defend their benefits. While fighting over control of these resources, these groups and individuals develop their own interests. Attention is placed on class, race, and gender in this perspective because they are seen as the most important bases and long-term struggles in society. For example, conflict theorists may explain the civil rights movements of the 1960s by studying how protestors argued …show more content…
Marx viewed the organization of society relative to its main classes, and the struggle concerning them as the engine of transformation in this structure. There are two great classes of society: the bourgeoisie, who own the means of production such as machinery and factories, and whose foundation of income is profit, and the proletariats’ who own their labor and sell it for a wage. These classes become political forces. Marx states that finally, the division between these two classes would then broaden and social structure will collapse. With the basis of classes therefore wiped away, a classless society will succeed and political power and the state will fade away. A key example of social conflict theory is the typical laborer. The laborer works within a factory, earns a wage, and goes home with a paycheck. This would seem fair, but now you have to take into consideration that the owner of that same factory must pay the worker a low wage in order to make any profit. There are several elements in Marx 's view of class conflict: classes are power relationships based on property ownership; classes are naturally opposed by the advantages of their interests, political association. Lastly, structural change is the aftermath of the class …show more content…
Cooley´s idea of the looking glass self, states that a person’s identity advances out of an individual’s social interactions with others. The main point is that we form our self-image as the thoughts of the response and assessments of others in our environment. As children, we were treated in a variety of ways. For example, if parents or see a child as intelligent, they manage to raise that child with certain kinds of expectations. Therefore, the child will eventually believe that he is an intelligent person. According to Cooley, this course has three steps. First, we imagine how we appear to another people, which is just built from our views. Second, we perceived what judgments people make of us depending on how we look. Lastly, we imagine how the individual feels about us, which will come from the judgments made by us. We usually alter our actions and looks based on how we think people view

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The individual factory refers to peasants and craftsmen working individually to produce their own livelihood. The anarchy of social production refers to the same circulating problems found in social production. The 'anarchy ' in the anarchy of social production refers to the opposite of itself. Therefore the increasing organization of production on a social basis in each individual production establishment creates a contradiction. This is a contradiction because by adding the social aspect to an individual merchant forces surplus production on the producer and a market that has too many competitors for individuals to make decent earning.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This alienation is evident in Marx’s commodity fetishism as well as Lukács reification. Further, they argue that this alienation is a major problem of capitalism that needs to be addresses. Both reification and commodity fetishism alienate the worker and establish human beings as objects. The development of class consciousness is how the worker is able to overcome this…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Marx developed his theory based on power within the capitalist system. He believed classes existed and there were disparities in society and those inequalities deprived lower classes of materials and resources causing conflict (Krawford, 2009). Mills took it a step further and explained that there is an elite group of powerful individuals in society that occupy positions in bureaucratic organization and large institutions in industrial societies controlling the lower classes (Elwell, 2013). These theories are more key issues as to why happiness for individuals and groups are difficult to achieve. Karl Marx focuses on the capitalist system.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It has created power structures and the workers at the bottom have ideas imposed on them, which they are forced to accept. Human labor will soon become superfluous by the perfecting of future machinery (Engels, p. 707). This will create even more division between the people because of the existing competition. This “now puts these individuals in a position to raise themselves into the ruling class” (Marx, p. 174). The capitalistic society that we live in has enslaved workers.…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    While the debate between Mises and Marx continued, other philosophers would also debate if capitalism and socialism was better, and how each system would affect the entire society. Marx was against capitalism because of the gap between the two social classes that the capitalist system formed. Marx saw this struggle first hand during the Industrial Revolution and decided to write in his “Communist Manifesto”. He saw how the working poor became more of a commodity as the bourgeoisie obtained more and more power. Marx said that capitalism would make the rich richer and the poor poorer.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The power and money obsessed bourgeoisie is the cause of the revolution. Marx believed that capitalism contained the seeds of its own destruction. Every upper class needs a lower class which therefore in turn means capitalism needs a lower class and with the bourgeoisie exploiting the working class Marx knew it would lead to resentment causing the proletariats to revolt. The bourgeoisie were the antagonists for the revolution of the…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This reorganization will make it that production benefits collectively as a whole. The proletariat constitutes a vast exploited and alienated workforce while the bourgeois seizes political power. Marx had two predictions concerning the demise of capitalism. One prediction deals with the fact that capitalism is unstable and that we are unable to escape the recessions and depressions. The second deals with the modern working class, the proletarians, becoming impoverished and alienated.…

    • 2725 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In relation to how these characteristics drive the division of labor, as one that exists in order to debunk a revolution; a way to disembark the unity of workers by keeping them separate in order to optimize and expedite the production process. Marx states, “We have shown that the worker sinks to the level of a commodity and becomes indeed the most wretched of commodities”(70). The alienation of of the workplace can replicate to the alienation of society which references the formation of society, in which workers are stripped away from products of their labor and society, thereby highlighting their limited power in making decisions about economic, political and social structures. Because workers are at the bottom of the social hierarchy spectrum, the internalization of poverty allows them to fear the outbreak of change and chaos, thus ignore their ability to fight the system and subject themselves into slave labor for a means of survival. Workers are the the biggest contributors to society, yet are positioned into a place where they feel they can be fired, taken advantage of or jobless, therefore are forced to consent to substandard wages and conditions.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Conflict theorist proclaims that society is constantly undergoing change and it’s driven by class conflict. Conflict theorists examine how different dynamics of racial and ethnic relations divide groups, all while maintaining the power of the majority . The dominant group could be defined through racial categories or, through social class. Relationships — within a given society — are based on power, or force instead of consensus, and assimilation. Immigrants are used as a tool for capitalist endeavors, because workers are cheap and flexible ,which divides working class organization and drives down the rule of labor power (Leon Guerrero 2016:71).…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Marx and Engel idea of communism is that “class inequality would end with collective control of property and growth in size of power of the working class” (Essay UK). In summary, under conflict perspective we can say that the basic form of interaction in society is not cooperation, but competition and this leads to conflict. Because individuals and groups compete for advantage and power, there is always going to be conflict in a society. However, when a large group in the lower social class is competing against the upper class for a change, the outcome would often be a major social…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays

Related Topics