Patrick Henry at a Debate in the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 5 1788, and James Madison, in the Federalist, Number 10, 1787 represent two different perspectives on the ratification of the constitution. Anti-federalists and federalists were opposing forces in the ratification process. Anti-federalists wanted to prevent the constitution from being ratified while the federalists favored a strong central government and the passage of the constitution. Anti-federalists were against the ratification of the constitution. They feared the constitution could lead to autocratic tyranny.…
The anti-federalists feared that the central government would become too powerful and that if the government would commit an infraction on the states’ rights. The Federalists were in agreement with the constitution. The federalists were wealthy, well educated and were unified by the thought of higher power. The leaders of the Federalists included John Adams and Alexander Hamilton both yearned for an effective constitution. In contrast, the Anti-federalists were generally farmers and anybody that fell below the line of being wealthy.…
To this day, both sides, Anti-Federalist and Federalist, sound persuasive. The Anti-Federalists focused on the American want for local governments that respond directly to popular concerns. The Federalists argued that only a national government could really protect the people’s rights and turn the new nation into a great power. But more than just this are many other issues including that smaller states, who feel that they are operating just fine, will get the short end of the straw.…
The Federalists wanted a more centralized government, favored the Bill of Rights, Separation of Powers which made 3 equal branches of government, judicial, executive, and legislative. The Anti-Federalists believed in states’ rights and states’…
Although the Federalist shard many of the same ideas of the Antifederalist such as individual rights (Oaks 223). The Anti-Federalists shared different view on how the government should be ran. Because of their experiences with the tyranny of Great Britain, they feared the establishment of a strong national government. The Anti-Federalists also did not accept the use of separation of powers and checks and balances, because they feared the branches of government would abuse the power and not serve the purpose of protecting the rights and freedoms of the individuals. It was evident in the way they thought things should be ran and why they thought they where right, being that they where from a old-line of republicans and did not favor a system…
Anti-Federalists feared a powerful government would oppress the people. They argued that the new constitution was too much like the powerful British Monarchy. Anti-federalist thought the power should remain with the states and local governments.…
FEDERALIST/ANTI-FEDERALIST Political Viewpoint: ANTI-FEDERALIST 1. What fears does your side have about the future of the North American colonies? The Anti-Federalists feared that the Republican form of government formulated by the principles of the monarchy would be dominated by the features of aristocracy that allowed unwarranted stretch of power over the liberty, life and property of all its citizens. The federal government imposed secret deliberations and hasty plans for ratification which threatened the sovereignty and independence of all states.…
Some of America’s finest minds got together for the Philadelphia convention to figure out which form of government would be best. The Federalists were formed by Alexander Hamilton and its other well-known members were Benjamin Franklin, John Jay, George Washington, and James Madison. Federalists desired a secure central government and feeble state governments, preferred the Constitution to aid the amount owed and stress of the American Revolution, were against the Bill of Rights, and were supported in large urban areas. Meanwhile, the Anti-federalists were composed by Patrick Henry, John Hancock, Richard Lee, George Mason, and Mercy Warren. Anti-federalists insisted that power in the states not in the central government, picked the Articles…
The federalist of the Constitution were the people who supported it. The anti-federalist were those who went against it. Federalist thought that the Constitution was based on federalism. The anti-federalist believed that the Constitution took too much power away from the states and did not insured rights for the people. The federalists even wrote essays to answer the anti-federalist attacks to the Constitution.…
The Federalists are who instated the foundation for what our country is. Both the Federalists and Anti-Federalists had an opinions on how the nation should exist. However, the ideals of each group conflicted on multiple levels. Originally, the first draft for a constitution was established by the Articles of Confederation in 1778 (Kramnick, pg155). This was a document to draft laws for the newly independent states.…
I chose to focus my posting on “The Federalist/ Anti-Federalist Controversy.” The controversy started after the delegates drafted the new federal Constitution. They had to draft and make a new constitution because the Articles of Confederation were weak and falling apart. The Articles of Confederation was the form of government the United States was under. When the new Constitution came out, they sent it out to the states for approval.…
They believed that the powers of the government under the constitution would threaten their “liberties” and individual rights. The Anti-federalist weren’t a very centralized group they didn’t agree on a lot of things. For example, Some of the Anti-federalist opposed the constitution because they believed that having a strong central government would threaten popular sovereignty. As others believed that the government would turn out like Great Britain to were the government would become to powerful and it would be hard to resist the government.or fix it. After a lot of arguments the Anti-federalist and federalist came to a compromise and the constitution was then created in 1787 which included the Bill of…
On one hand the federalists believe that America needs a strong governemt and on the other hand the anti-federalists think the government will have too much power given to them from the constitution. To better understand these beliefs let me explain the ways the constitution regulates the power of the government. The way that the constitution regulates the government is by checks and balances. The way that the checks and balances work is by splitting up the government into three branches with each branch being able to limit the power of the other branches so that there could not be one branch of…
The Anti-Federalists needed to keep our legislature as seems to be, which would imply that we would fundamentally be a government. Doing this would cause threatening vibe toward the administration. The Federalists had confidence in a solid focal government. They needed the Constitution confirmed promptly, simply the way it was. They needed a portion of the forces expelled from the states and given to the focal government.…
The Federalists believed that the Constitution covered the natural rights given to a citizen, while the Anti-Federalists believed that the creation of a Bill of Rights was necessary to protect the individual rights of the…