In general, there will always be conflict and the hardest conflict to solve is social conflicts because you are dealing with people who practice differently religious and of a different culture. Therefore, because of different cultures there will always be some type of conflict in the workplace, homes or in our everyday surrounding. Furthermore, in the process of trying to solve resolved an intractable issue that it might not be resolved by communication or negotiation techniques because they involve different conflicting values and beliefs (Cahn, D., &. Abigail, R. A, 2014, p. 297). Is the United States the world police? In general, when discussing politics in the office it’ll often cause a conflict because everyone has a different view
…show more content…
I didn’t believe my nonmilitary family members had enough experience to voice their opinion on the matter so, I would call them the other group. The other group is defined as members of the out-group because they don’t have the same world view as in the in-group (Cahn, D., &. Abigail, R. A, 2014, p. 303). The argument would get even hotter because my nonmilitary family members are mostly Christians and don’t support killing and this would equate to a moral conflict. Even though, my former military members would explain the reasons on why the soldiers have to kill the enemy. In the end, no matter how much they try to rationalize the killing my nonmilitary family members that the killings just don’t make good sense and some view the answer suggested as ridiculously (Cahn, D., &. Abigail, R. A, 2014, p. 304).
In summary, I didn’t know all of the concepts in managing social conflicts and what cause them to exist and how they can cause a conflict. Therefore, in completing this assignment I learned that intractable issues are fueled by many different variables in the context surrounding them (Cahn, D., &. Abigail, R. A, 2014, p. 304). To sum it up, I was able to provides ways to manage social conflicts by recognizing intractable issues, world view, values, and conflicts between you and the
I didn’t believe my nonmilitary family members had enough experience to voice their opinion on the matter so, I would call them the other group. The other group is defined as members of the out-group because they don’t have the same world view as in the in-group (Cahn, D., &. Abigail, R. A, 2014, p. 303). The argument would get even hotter because my nonmilitary family members are mostly Christians and don’t support killing and this would equate to a moral conflict. Even though, my former military members would explain the reasons on why the soldiers have to kill the enemy. In the end, no matter how much they try to rationalize the killing my nonmilitary family members that the killings just don’t make good sense and some view the answer suggested as ridiculously (Cahn, D., &. Abigail, R. A, 2014, p. 304).
In summary, I didn’t know all of the concepts in managing social conflicts and what cause them to exist and how they can cause a conflict. Therefore, in completing this assignment I learned that intractable issues are fueled by many different variables in the context surrounding them (Cahn, D., &. Abigail, R. A, 2014, p. 304). To sum it up, I was able to provides ways to manage social conflicts by recognizing intractable issues, world view, values, and conflicts between you and the