Conflic Hobbes 'Justifying A State'

Superior Essays
Athena Olsen

February 5th, 2016

Justifying a State

Hobbes argues that to break free from a state of nature, man kind would have to submit themselves to a system of absolute sovereignty. There is a shortage of everything good in the world, pushing people towards pursuits and actions that are hierarchically constructed by nature to become the greatest evil they can be. Which is pronounced as the war of all against all which characterizes the state of nature. Justification, but more so pushing the need for an absolute sovereign because the 'solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short' in the state of nature is the one thing above all else that cannot be averted. Because his principle idea is based on human nature, that all human beings seek to satisfy their desires there cannot be a higher good for men. Rather a constant progression of appetites, a saddening reality that no man generally wants anything in particular but the prevailing and ultimately consuming desire 'to assure forever, the way of his future desire,' and because of this way of existence a state will forever be necessary and justifiable.
…show more content…
The reason a state is justifiable is that it is given assorted capabilities through which it has the ability to establish a barrier and instruct a world where we are able to preserve peace to hinder from reverting back into the state of nature. The main idea is a state of war would be dreadful for every inhabiter but for that exact same reason it makes everyone willing to live a life in such a state. Its’ as to say yes this is bad but it could be so much worst. And for that we accept it and the stresses of every day life drown out the noise until its merely a thought for those that have too much time on their

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Meng Tzu Case Study

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In that state of nature we respond to others in three different ways. First, competition, which is what we invade to take what another has for ourselves. Second, diffidence, which is when we fear another and have a desire for safety in order to retain what we already have. Lastly, the strife for glory, which is when we worry about appearing significant in another’s eyes. A society with laws and moral codes can be instituted from a state of nature because Hobbes believed a society is formed is due to fear and the desire for security.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore, according to Hobbes in order to come out of this nightmarish state that is the state of nature the citizens would be willing to live under any form of authority therefore he advocates for the institution of a covenant and sovereign of power. A covenant is basically a voluntary act of consent where you the citizen are passing on to your sovereign your rights and a sovereign of power is fundamentally an absolute monarchy where there is absolute power for a single person and no one else. Hobbes states that the sovereign's power is indivisible, and he is only liable to god, no anyone else and if you revolt against him you will be going back to the nightmarish state that is the state of nature where everyone is fighting for the ultimate goal of self-preservation (115-116). Hobbes is all for an absolute monarchy thinking that one person with absolute power is better than a government or worse living in the state of nature where there are no laws and you have to fight for survival every…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes, strongly supporting a sovereign government to control political and social order, debates the evils of man’s free…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Leviathan, Hobbes makes a few key assumptions about human behavior in the natural world – namely that all men are equal, desire for what is best for oneself, and have the right to do all things in the preservation and improvement of life – in the “the state of nature”. Upon this, he builds his subtractive…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Leviathan of Hobbes proposes a system of supremacy that a supreme or invincible ruler controls. Meanwhile, Locke's Second Treatise of Government presents a government that is dependable or responsible to its people with restrictions on the supremacy or power of the sovereign. Furthermore, according to Hobbes, the "state of nature" is both extremely a cruel setting and oddly formed or structured. Hobbes recognizes that we have natural laws that exist, but he mostly talks about the "state of nature" as a place of total or absolute independence. However, what like Spiderman's uncle said, with great power comes great responsibility.…

    • 1758 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First, Thomas Hobbes describes the state of nature and human beings as solely wanting power over one another. He states that nature makes humans equal from the start as so nobody is smarter or stronger from the beginning, but by how we allow ourselves to become. According to Hobbes, the state of nature has “no common ways of life, no enforced laws or moral rules, and no justice or injustice, for these concepts do not apply” (Hobbes, 66). In this quote he means that there is society would be incapable of existing except with the power of the state. He has the idea that humans would be incapable of governing themselves because eventually everyone would break out into chaos and lose all order they had.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The State of Nature, in Hobbes’s opinion, is the equal opportunities of ability and desire which creates conflict, which makes people enemies of each others. He believes…

    • 2532 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes and Locke’s methods of discerning the cause of man’s desire to join a commonwealth are very similar, yet they both have dissimilar views on what the state of nature should be like and what the legitimate power would look like, but Locke’s creation of executive prerogative complicates his negative views of Hobbes’s sovereign. Though Locke disagrees often with the works of Hobbes, he does share similar qualities of both his view of legitimate political power and what the state of nature is like. In both Hobbes and Locke’s view, the legitimate authority of government comes from receiving the consent of those that want to join the commonwealth while still in the state of nature. In the state of nature, Hobbes and Locke both agree on the idea that man is an individualist, looking out only for himself.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Do you have an unquenchable and selfish desire for power? According to Thomas Hobbes take on human nature, you do. This view will be examined by asking; Does Hobbes’s account of why life would be so bad in the ‘state of nature’ rest on a false assumption about human nature? Who is Thomas Hobbes will be the first premise for investigation then The ‘state of nature’ as defined by Hobbes will be described then assessed.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Hobbes we are all equal in our ability to kill each other. Due to this unfortunate circumstance, Hobbes argues that there needs to be a common sovereign to direct us towards a common benefit. Under this sovereign we consent to not be equal. Hobbes points to the state…

    • 1601 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes Vs Locke

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The competing accounts of the state of nature given by Thomas Hobbes and John Locke are extremely contrasting, but both provide persuasive arguments for the transition to the state. In this essay I will compare and contrast the Hobbesian State of Nature and Lockean State of Nature, however, I argue that Locke’s account is preferred as it provides greater security for its inhabitants. Part 1 The State of Nature, as Professor Lynne Fox describes it is, “A hypothetical account of what life would be like in a “natural state” with no government and no laws” (Hobbes PP) which provides an assessment to the sources, purposes, and limits of government authority.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Life in the State of Nature was describes by Hobbes as being ‘solitary’, ‘poor’, ‘nasty’, ‘brutish’, and ‘short’. Hobbes also believed humans have a natural desire for security and order. And in order to secure self-protection and to avoid misery and pain, societies began entering into contracts. These ideas of self-defense are inherent to human nature and in order to achieve this people would voluntarily surrender their rights and freedoms to a Leviathan via contract who would command obedience. This led…

    • 1704 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sometimes, a lot of people want the same exact thing. Unfortunately, we can’t all have the same thing. So, according to Hobbes, appetite, scarcity, and power are key features of the state of nature. He views the state of nature as full of violence and fear, but also full of people only looking out for…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    “He accomplished this by depicting the state of nature in horrible terms as a war of all against all, in which life is ‘solitary poor, nasty, brutish short’” (Leviathan, Chapter 13). Hobbes argues that, in order to get rid of the injustice, people had to give their full consent by giving up all their rights to the government so that the government can have full rights over the state of nature. It was set up to make people believe you are doing what is better to keep you in power. The beginning of state of nature meaning war.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes reduces the state of nature to a list of laws based on the individual’s desire to seek peace, which would conflict with the scenario Hobbes presents. However, one could view the state of nature as an example of collective rationality prescribing individual rationality. In the end, peace may be the goal, but it can only be achieved if others are united in seeking this goal.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays