Pros And Cons Of Confederation

Improved Essays
Discretely United
A confederation is an organization of a number of parties or groups united in an alliance or league. The American colonists wanted to be its own separate confederation, or country, united as one. Many of the people were weary of the British rule and the tax they imposed which included the Stamp and Sugar Act in order to pay for debt acquired from the French and Indian War. Therefore, the colonists rebelled against Great Britain. They fought for long eight years from 1775 to 1783, and won their independence. With this, the Americans were able to have their own right to formation of law and government. However, although they were independent and one country now, there were diverging views from each of the thirteen states
…show more content…
This was important because it did not allow the states to bargain with other countries which could have cause conflict between other states and countries. But this was only one of the few strengths of a document that had many weaknesses. Because the Congress and the states feared of having a power like Britain they decided to let the states have sovereignty. This can be represented in Articles II of the document where it states “Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom, and independence, and every Power, Jurisdiction and right…” Sovereignty can be defined as the supreme power or authority. This created problem because the states do not have to listen to any other states or the government, which was Congress at the time. Congress could do nothing about it due to the fact that all states had their own jurisdiction. Since the Articles had no executive power it lacked to enforce and type of policies towards the states. One including the power to tax. They could only ask the states to pay their taxes but could not enforce it since they did not have the power to. The states were becoming so divided that each state began to have their own currency and refused to accept each other’s coined money. The United States was one country, however it was clear that each state was becoming more independent with the Articles in …show more content…
Shay’s Rebellion was a significant event that rendered why a change was needed and also alarmed many politicians at the time. Politicians like Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay pushed for a new constitution, and created The Federalist Papers. In the written documents consisted on how the new government would operate and why it was the best option for the United States. In “The Federalist No.1”, Alexander Hamilton illustrates the “insufficiency of the existing federal government” and how the country desperately needs a new constitution. He also states in the same paragraph “comprehending in its consequence” portraying what is happening with the union at the moment and what is going to continue to happen if the old constitution is still

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    With each state acting separately, there was no national military, thus putting the borders of the new country at risk. However, due to Article II, the central government was not able to interfere with any interstate issues. The central government was a single Congress, which left the execution of the few laws to be left by each state. The powers given to Congress in the Articles of Confederation were the ability to declare war and peace, make treaties or alliances, to coin or borrow money and to regulate trade with…

    • 1083 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After America declared its independence in July of 1776, Congress knew this was their opportunity to create something completely out of the ordinary, that would have to stand the tale of time. The following year, the Continental Congress created the Articles of Confederation, which ultimately divided the federal government from the state. This article wrote the ground rules for America's regulation of currency, foreign affairs and guidelines for war, but left out the States, to decipher their policies individually (1*). Ten years later, the Constitutional Convention knew that America needed to be seen as a whole, even with the separation of power. The Constitution was written to unionize the States with the Federal government, and was finalized…

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Framers of the United States Constitution ultimately decided to give more power to the Federal government rather than the state governments because the articles of confederation wasn’t running our country in the right direction. The Articles of confederation had no central power, at all. The Federal government then became the main focus of the two contracts, because it was more stable. Under the Articles of Confederation the state held all the power and they gave some power to the federal government, which caused economic, trading and law problems. The constitution then gave more power to the federal government and gave the states less power because that would give a central power for people.…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Articles of Confederation were adopted on November 15, 1777, but were not ratified by the 13 states until March 1, 1781. To a great extent, the Articles were very weak and did not provide an effective form of government. Nevertheless, they were not completely futile, the Articles were able to provide a few effective forms of government. For example, they created the Northwest ordinance of 1787 and the Land ordinance of 1785, two positive products of the Articles. On the other hand, there were many negatives to the Articles, such as no power to tax, no national court system, and hardly any international trade.…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore there was a lot of communication within states. Which meant that if there was ever a conflict then they could resolve it without war, or severe consequences. The Articles of Confederation had many strength, but as did weaknesses. A weakness was that Congress had no type of income, because each state had their own currency. Congress wasn’t able to impose taxes; they were only allowed to borrow money.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the formation of the U.S. government, two different forms of government were initiated. At first, the Americans wanted to form a government that was nothing like monarchy, as they didn’t want a repeat of King George. The Articles of Confederation served as the first constitution of the United States, which was ratified in 1781. However, the Articles of Confederation had issues. The main issue was that the national government was too weak.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nevertheless, the government grabbed a hold of the new gained territory commonly known as “Old Northwestern” under the Land Ordinance of 1758 to help pay off the national debt. However, as shown in Document E, states lying on the Atlantic coast or “landlocked” such as Vermont, Maryland, Rhode Island had no chance of paying off their debt like Georgia, the Carolinas, and New York that just expanded their borders for the western claims. Congress did not have the power to tax individual states through the Articles of Confederation, leaving it to ask the wealthy inhabitants of landlocked states to graciously give to the debt of the state. Thus, the Articles failed to raise money through taxation or tariff and caused Congress to eventually take money from commercially inclined states. The Articles did not provide for any uniform system of currency.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The New Constitution

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    Apart from the states ratifying conventions, the debates also took the form of a public discussion, mainly through newspaper editorials, with federalists on one side supporting the constitution, and anti- Federalists objecting to the Constitution. Writers from both sides tried to convince the public that precious liberty and self-government, hard-earned during the late Revolution, were at stake in the question. Anti-federalists such as Centinel, the Federal Farmer, and Brutus argued that the new Constitution will ultimately lead to the dissolution of the state governments, the consolidation of the Union into “one great republic” under an unchecked national government, and as a result the loss of a free, self-government. Brutus particularly alleged that in such an extensive and diverse nation, nothing short of despotism “could bind so great a country under one…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    From 1933 to 1948 Newfoundlanders were faced with the possibility of joining the Confederation of Canada. Some historians speculate that Newfoundland was coerced into joining Canada by both Britain and Canada itself because of the financial issues that Newfoundland was facing at the time. Newfoundlanders were concerned about religion, education, and their children. Some Newfoundlanders were debating whether Britain could legally force them to join the Confederation. Newfoundlanders had both positive and negative reactions to the idea of joining Canada in 1948.…

    • 1889 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The federal government under the Articles of Confederation was the so to say the first constitution. It was written when the people feared strong, authority figures in the government. It basically set up the Continental Congress only at a federal level. There were no other branches other than those at a state level. States kept only the rights that Congress did not control.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Articles of Confederation. Drafted during the Revolutionary War during the fledgling years of this country. The newly independent people were wary of the power of the centralized authority they had just fled. The Articles of Confederation reflected a decision to reject the absurd notion the government should ever be more powerful than its states. The idea that a larger government should exist by consensus of the smaller members is admirable.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Articles of Confederation attempted to provide structure, and governance to the newly emancipated states. After ratification, numerous problems arose from the setup of the government. This prompted for a revision of the Articles of Confederation. Two groups emerged around the debate for a new constitution. The two groups are the federalist who supported a strong central government, and the anti-federalist who did not.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They wanted to maintain the individual liberty that would guard the citizens from the central government, specifically, taking power away from the government. They wanted to make sure to maintain individual rights by enforcing what they had placed in the Declaration of Independence. The main duty of the states was to defend and protect the rights of the people by listening to concerns or issues that they have. Like many other established ideas of the founding fathers, things in history have been distorted. For example, legislation had been in control of appointing senators for 125 years before the 17th Amendment was ratified.…

    • 1879 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The History of the Constitutional Convention In 1787, Congress realized that states governing themselves would leave the nation powerless when faced with another war. The United States had adopted the Articles of Confederation a decade prior, but the system wasn’t working. Each state was able to govern itself, and they didn’t have to abide by any regulations set by the federal government. The United States has a federalist government, meaning that the citizens are held to the laws of the state and the nation, but the federal government was left nearly powerless to enforce any type of authority. Congress had no way of being able to regulate commerce and no authority to emplace taxes.…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Political System

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Which political system is better for a country? Each country have different needs, cultures, history, strengths and weaknesses to take into account in order to find the appropriate system. The aftermath of war in Iraq, when talking about politics, was focused on asserting control over the country, the next step in order to rebuild the country is establishing a representational system, the majority believe that democracy is the system to follow, since a democracy is not a unknown concept for them, but the success of democracy depend on whether the United States take into consideration the unique social and communal population or the system was chosen because it have been prove to work for them. A confederation is an alliance of sovereign states united for common objectives, this system is supposed to unite the different colonies, states or factions.…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays