My job is the concept challenger, I believe the concept of Rhino breaking the swing, should be challenged, I believe this because, Rhino the “Imaginary friend” had apparently broke the swing, the quote that I had used for this challenge was : “It’s not my fault because Rhino was the one who broke the swing. And I told them so, but Mother and Father don’t believe me. How could I, little Michael, smaller even than all of my friends, break a tire swing like that one? With such a thick rope? It would take a much heavier person. Or a much heavier animal. A rhinoceros. And that was what did do it. Rhino”, (PG.5 Stuart Baum). I believe that Stuart Baum was trying to show that Rhino was not real, and imaginary, and Michael was passing over something that he did, but not wanting to get in trouble for this action, I think this because Rhino the “Imaginary friend” Is invisible, so Michael is lying to his parents, to accuse Rhino that he did break the swing. To prove that Michael was right, Michael had said “ It would …show more content…
Or a much heavier animal. A rhinoceros”, In this part, I think Michael is backing up himself, and at this time Rhino was not responding, it was in Michaels head (Rhino was imaginary in Michaels head), because Rhino Is an imagination and in the quote it says “rhinoceros” and Rhino is a rhinoceros, and because a rhinoceros are heavy, and much heavier than a regular person, so Michael was proving that his friend that is imaginary ( Rhino ) did it, but for real Michael did it, because Rhino is a thought and not possible to