According to Penrod and Hupcey (2005), “concept analysis focuses on the integration of what is known. Concept advancement techniques actually move the state of the science forward through synthesis of new insight” (p. 233). Concept analysis concentrates on the current knowledge, whereas concept advancement concentrates on new knowledge (Penrod & Hupcey). Concept analysis is completed for the current a concept, however concept advancement looks for new learning. With concept analysis, the normal meaning …show more content…
It makes processes comprehensible. This distinction might promote clinical interventions. Concept analysis is an incorporation of what is recognized, not through an appraisal of quality or maturity of the concept. The level of concept advancement is not determined via the label indicating level of maturity (Hupcey & Penrod, 2005). In principle-based concept analysis, researchers have to concentrate on the evidence established in the scientific literature, not constructed conditions or fictional exploration (Hupcey & Penrod). It is essential that the researchers have the ability to conclude with a summative section on what is recognized in order to expose gaps in existing thinking (Hupcey & Penrod). The analysis is established in the scientific literature. The analysis detects the case of the science, and should be established in the literature of the chosen disciplines. Concept analysis is the first step at concept advancement (Hupcey & Penrod). Concept analysis might assist individual to understand the idea easily, especially the concept in science. Concept analysis in science and research is necessary for a person, so that an individual can understand essential ideas via ideal