This process facilitates the recommendation of job specifications and tests that measure the extent to which a job candidate possesses a particular job specification. Each recommended test comes with a score of its particular validity to determine the measurement of a particular KSAOC. PAQs are uniquely useful to prove job relatedness when a job specification results in adverse impact. There is already case law that supports the use of PAQs, such as in Daniel Taylor vs. James River Corporation and EEOC vs. Major Southwestern Utility. However, it is recommended that the PAQ is taken by a field expert trained in job analysis as the language and reading level necessaries to complete the questionnaire correctly are elevated. Once KSAOCs are identified by the PAQ, training materials exemplifying their use as applicable to the specific job’s tasks can be
This process facilitates the recommendation of job specifications and tests that measure the extent to which a job candidate possesses a particular job specification. Each recommended test comes with a score of its particular validity to determine the measurement of a particular KSAOC. PAQs are uniquely useful to prove job relatedness when a job specification results in adverse impact. There is already case law that supports the use of PAQs, such as in Daniel Taylor vs. James River Corporation and EEOC vs. Major Southwestern Utility. However, it is recommended that the PAQ is taken by a field expert trained in job analysis as the language and reading level necessaries to complete the questionnaire correctly are elevated. Once KSAOCs are identified by the PAQ, training materials exemplifying their use as applicable to the specific job’s tasks can be