Compromise Of 1850 Analysis

Great Essays
Compromise of 1850 This Compromise was based off of Clay’s eight resolutions to settle controversy of slavery on January 29, 1850. President Taylor’s efforts to bring CA and NM to the union as free states angered many because southerners, slaveholders, fought in the Mexican War and they believed that their desires should hold more weight over this matter. Without seeing much progress, the South threatened to leave the Union and the session between the nation greatened. People looked upon Clay to make peace like he did with the Missouri Compromise. Clay’s resolutions were: admit CA as a free state, organize territories of NM and UT without restrictions on slavery, deny TX’s claim on New Mexico, compensate TX by having the federal government …show more content…
Stowe was a pious daughter, sister, and wife of Congregationalist ministers and she epitomized the powerful religious underpinnings of the abolitionist movement. Her motivation for writing the novel was her disgust with the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850. By 1855, her novel was called “the most popular novel of our day.” It depicts a combination of unlikely saints and sinners, stereotypes, fugitive slaves, escapades, and the sad realities of slavery that was made real to readers. Many slaveholders were dissatisfied with her novel, and one mailed Stowe an anonymous parcel with a severed ear of a disobedient slave. Although her novel took time to have effect on public opinión, the North were more open to the abolitionist ideas and movements to increase because readers were able to develop empathy for the slaves as they read the novel. Faced with the realistic horrors of slavery, the Northerners were able to unite in their anti-slavery beliefs that grew so strong to contradict beliefs of the South and go to war for their …show more content…
Sandford. Scott was born a slave in VA around 1800 and was sold to an army surgeon in 1830 who took him to Illinois, then to the Wisconsin Territory and finally back to St. Louis in 1842. His owner died in 1843 and Scott attempted to buy his freedom and in 1846 his wife persuaded him to file a suit in the Missouri courts that claimed that residence in Illinois and Wisconsin Territory had made him into a free man. A jury decided in his favor but the state supreme court ruled against him and eventually the case rose on appeal to the Supreme Court. The Chief Justice Roger Taney said that because Scott lacked citizenship, he also lacked legal standing like all former slaves. He was an ardent supporter of the South and slavery and claimed that blacks had were considered as inferior for more than a century that they had no rights same to the whites. Taney’s decision began flames of dissension and republicans protested the decision because it nullified their anti-slavery program. IT also reinforced the suspicion that the pro-slavery group was starting a conspiracy because all but one justices who had voted with Taney were southerners. This started suspicion and further division of the two groups and sparked tensions of

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    history. The Dred Scott v. Sandford was probably the worst court decision ever decided by supreme court justices, as Dred Scott a former slave was taken to go live in Illinois (a free-state) for a year. Dred Scott along with his wife Harriet sued their owners for having slaves in a free-state and should be granted their freedom. This 11-year long struggle would soon surface into the Supreme Court, where by a majority margin, 7-2, Scott was sadly still a slave. In an attempt to end and solve the slavery problem once and for all, Supreme Court Justice Roger B. Taney quote "[Black people] Had for more than a century before been regarded as beings of an inferior order, and altogether unfit to associate with the white race, either in social or political relations; and so far inferior that they had no rights which…

    • 1601 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Compromise of 1820, also known as the Missouri compromise, was a bill that was formed to create boundaries that split the United States between the Northern free states (non-slavery), and the Southern slave states. The boundary line for slave states and non-slave states was latitude 36°30′(see map below). At the time the northern states economy was industrial, and the southern states economy was more agricultural. For this reason the southern states relied heavily on the use of slaves to farm the land. In 1819 Alabama joined the union as a slave state.…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Throughout the mid-18th century, the Dred Scott Supreme Court decision became a key contributing factor in the separation between the Union and Confederacy going into the American Civil War. With the conflict of proslavery and antislavery groups fighting for new states, this choice became a debated topic within the detached United States for the effect it had in the slavery legal and economic system. Riots transpired and differences between political leaders and Court justices arose as the decision was made. Historical documents, like the Missouri Compromise of 1820 and the U.S. Constitution, were used within this court case by Chief Justice Roger Taney to lead towards the defeat of Scott.…

    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The North was broadly opposed to slavery and this cultural difference shaped the rhetoric of war. Economic and cultural fear propelled the country into war, but slavery was not even the gist of it all. While the Republican Party was anti-slavery, it was…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    But serval members of congress from the north objected this. There were 11 slave’s states and 11 Free states. By adding Missouri there would be an increase in slave state and the power of southern states senate. The Missouri compromise was signed in to law 1820. The Missouri compromise had two main points; Missouri would be allowed slavery and Maine will be part of free state Which will balance the power of north and south.…

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through the Supreme Court rulings such as in the Dred Scott case, the North and South fought numerous times over slavery. The North feared the many potential consequences of this case. The South was reluctant to give up slavery for various reasons. The Dred Scott v. Sandford case set precedent for other cases with similar conflicts. This case also provided reasons for the Civil War to occur between the North and South.…

    • 2004 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When people think of compromise, they normally think of an agreement. In this agreement, the two parties usually have to give up some interest and move toward a middle ground. “The Compromise of 1850 was an attempt to try and find a middle ground on many of the issues that were affecting the United States” (Compromise of 1850). “The main principle of the compromise was to address the growing issues of slavery and possibly avoid a Civil War in the United States” (Urofsky). Sometimes, however, two parties cannot come to agreement and resentment becomes the result.…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq Essay

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This resulted in the void of the case ruling in Sanford’s favor. This upset northern including: former slaves, political figures in the north, and slaves in the south. People angered by the situation wrote articles such as Uncle Tom’s Cabin by Harriet Stowe. The south also had uprising like the Nat Turner Rebellion when a group of rebels killed 55 to 65 whites.(Document…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    First, Abraham Lincoln’s election as president was a huge blow to the southern community, as it made them nervous he would eventually abolish slavery. They considered this a threat to their luxury of enjoying the profit of slavery. Although Lincoln was clear about his opposition of slavery he also admitted he had not intention of messing with the South’s slave system. For example, Lincoln said, “I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists (Hine, 2014).” Be that as it may, the South was not convinced.…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dred Scott was slave who sued for his liberty in the Missouri courts, arguing that four years on free soil had made him free. He was once owned by army surgeon John Emerson. Dred Scott’s attorney argued that between 1831 and 1833, John Emerson had taken Scott with him during various military postings to areas where the Missouri Compromise banned slavery, making Dred Scott a free man. When nearly after six years in the Missouri courts, the state Supreme Court rejected this argument in 1852, Dred Scott, with the help of abolitionist lawyers, appealed to the United States Supreme Court. In a 7 to 2 decision, the Court ruled against Dred Scott.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That is Sandford’s argument. Slavery was questioned during that period of time, certainly, that debate was popular at that time. The final decision was that Supreme Court favored Sandford. Despite a hot debate, 7 out of 9 justices, including Chief Justice Roger Taney, disagreed with Scott.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sandford. Lincoln tried to force Douglas to choose between his principle of popular sovereignty proposed in his Kansas-Nebraska Act which created the new territories of Kansas and Nebraska and endowed the citizens the legislative power to decide, through popular sovereignty, whether or not they would allow slavery, and the decision reached by the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott case. The case surrounded an enslaved African American man that was suing for his freedom after being held captive within the boundaries of two free states. The issues before the court had been whether or not entering “free” territory made a slave free and whether this freedom granted blacks the ability to sue in federal court. The justices ruled that under the language of the constitution did not apply to blacks because within the context of when the constitution was written, slaves were seen solely as property and had no rights.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The decision had eventually turned against the anti-slavery Northerners. Many people had said that this was one of courts’ worst decisions. This leads to sectionalism between the North and the South because the decision had supported the idea of slavery meaning that it had gone against the Northerners who were…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Slavery has been one of the most talked about subjects in history. It is a significantly important in our history. The Antebellum period was known for many reform movements. Slavery supported the economy of the United States, the nation went from underdeveloped farmers to becoming a driving force financially. It influenced important leaders, which eventually lead to war.…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays