Compatibilism Free Will Essay

Good Essays
The problem with free will is whether or not we make our own decisions or not. In this essay, I will discuss the three main points of view that tries to answer the problem of free will. The first argument is that we have free will, which is the idea that we have complete free choice and freedom. The second theory is determinism, which says everything is inevitable and everything is caused by previous decisions in the past. The third point of view is compatibilism. Compatibilism says that most things are determined but some decisions we make are free.
Free will is the concept that we have our own personal freedom and that we are in complete control of ourselves. Free will says that we make our own choices and that no external forces cause us to make our own conscious decisions. Free willism does recognize that the universe relies on cause and effect but says that we generate the ideas that start the causal chain of events. The main argument for free will is that it feels like we have the ability to make our own choices and since we
…show more content…
Compatibilism is the middle ground between determinism and free will. Compatibalism is often referred to as “soft determinism.” When it comes to moral responsibility, the problem is that if we have no control over our actions we cannot hold anyone accountable for anything they do. This would mean that nobody could be tried in jail because if they committed a crime, it was not their fault since they were going to commit said crime no matter what. Compatibilism’s stance on responsibility is that we can still take moral responsibility for our actions even though they are determined. Compatibilism says that we are responsible for our own actions because our choices come from our own mind. So, the reason we are considered morally responsible is because we do what we want to do even though we couldn’t do

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Libertarianism is a political philosophy that believes that we have free will and that it does not work together with determination. They believe that free will is the way for us to be morally responsible. They also believe that it is in their power to create their own future with the ability that they are given to choose whatever, whenever. They believe that things could have been done differently, so it is our responsibility to make the right decisions. It is freedom of predetermination and one's nature.…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Free In Morality

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A free-will, in general, is the individual`s fulfillment of his wishes without pressure or coercion. In order to be able to evaluate human actions as “virtuous”, “positive”, or “negative”, they must be freely and willingly done. That been said, responsibility requires free-will. Libertarianism explains this idea very well that people have a seperation between their moral self and personality. The personality is the one that can be predicted by the laws.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    We are defined by how we act, not by how society expects us to act. Hence where free will comes into play. We become our choices, and take full responsibility for any and everything we do. There is no being an existential person if one can’t have the freedom of free will to choose whom they would like to…

    • 2011 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The reconciliation of moral responsibility and freewill allows us to understand how having freewill forces humans to believe that their behaviors and doings are morally responsible because their actions are caused naturally and or are determined. The question here is what is free will? Historically speaking, it is the action of acting freely; meaning everything is done causally due to the person. Free will and moral responsibility go hand in hand, but the issue is can a person really be in control of these things they had no control over? The problem with free will is that we believe determinism is true, but also that we are morally responsible; meaning we are held responsible for the actions we choose.…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    These actions are made freely because they are determined by the person’s self-forming action which was determined by a choice that was also made freely. All in all, a person can have free will whether or not their actions are previously determined because they form their self-forming actions. When we discuss who is right and who is wrong, we can say that Strawson made a great point, but Kane made a better one. In Strawson’s argument he claims that all of our choices are predetermined by factors we cannot control; he then goes on to conclude that because of these factors, we do not have free will. Similarly, Kane claims that some of our choices are predetermined but are still made freely.…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Control is out of this world. “Compatibilism is the thesis that we are both determined and yet at the same time have the sort of freedom necessary to be morally responsible for our actions” (McKenna). Everybody has their own viewpoints on free will and hard determinism. It is often said that it can only be one or the other. The economy, the laws, and the people are only doing what is set in stone for them to be doing, or making their own choices in life.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Compatibilism holds that human behavior is both caused and determined and voluntary behavior is nonetheless free to the extent that it is not outwardly expressed; however, Libertarianism, on the other hand, implies that all of our choices are free from any sort of deterministic theories or forces. Compatibilism is suited best for explaining free will as it acknowledges man as a free moral agent while being restrained by the doctrine of total depravity; Libertarianism takes upon itself to rely on concepts that tend to juxtapose one another, such as Open Theism, in order to rationalize free will. Compatibilism, as mentioned previously, is the view that causal determinism is true, but mankind still acts freely, being morally responsible agents…

    • 1013 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Determinism is an opposed of freewill, in which every action is prearranged by past. The problem with this policy is that no one could be blame for their action whether it’s good or bad-since everything is prearranged. Determinism falls into two further categories: hard determinism and soft determinism. It also means that freewill is predetermine too. Unlike determinism freewill is a very important factor for taking concern, which can create a dilemma in society to punish or praise anyone for his or her actions.…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Since free will is nothing more than an idea of being able to control our on actions, assuming we will take ownership of moral responsibility. These actions could be determined by cause and effect. The problem associated with free will, is that it is subjected to many different concepts such as, sin, guilt , responsibility and judgements associated to making decisions for yourself. When a person feels guilty about a decision they made, subconsciously they know they have probably made the wrong decision. I believe natural intentions are proof that free will may have some truth to…

    • 1101 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    we are entirely responsible for what we become, putting the future of humanity in our own hands. Finally, Sartre's idea of radical freedom is essentially that everyone has a choice, and every act is a free act. When people believe they have 'no choice' but to do something, they are being deceptive towards themselves. To begin with, as humans we are born into existence…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays