Comparison Of World War I And The League Of Nations

Reading this document “World War I and the League of Nations”, I have captured Wilson’s principal purpose in deliverance was to present a practical choice both to the traditional notion of an international balance of power gained by alliances among nations. As President of the United States, Woodrow could pass some very important legislations on those and many other issues, pledging to keep America out of World War I. Though he proposed to keep America out of World War I, Once Wilson knew that the U.S. would be unable to avoid entering the war, he worked to find a way to stop such a war from happening again. Wilson was unlikely forced to declare war on Germany after the use of unrestricted submarine warfare. Wilson had to come together with …show more content…
Woodrow’s strong belief in peace and international cooperation could not keep the United States from entering World War I. The underlying belief that he had, which was peace, was shattered by the Great War. He no longer stressed his motive for the war as revenge, but instead of “victorious assertion) (PG161). He felt as if his “right” was more valuable than peace within the nations. In the face of all this he asks himself,” can people still maintain that the peace movement is making progress?” Woodrow Wilson’s leadership in my opinion is liberal, democratic and idealistic. He spoke in big and inspiring terms but wasn’t certain of the specifics of how his goals would be achieved. Woodrow felt entitled to lead his nation. He felt he was providing a service of humanity. Woodrow set out certain goals that he wanted to achieve throughout the war. If the United States was going to fight in Europe and the soldiers were going to lose their lives, he wanted to establish exactly what they were fighting for and why they were risking their lives for their nation. Woodrow Wilson never lost faith that his country would one day join in a world community for