Comparison Of Twelve Angry Men And Democracy

Improved Essays
“Twelve Angry Men” by Reginald Rose and “Democracy” by Langston Hughes are different in that one text is a play with a jury that is an a conflict, whereas the other is a poem talking about freedom and equal rights. Although Rose and Hughes both say that everybody should have to do the something as everybody else, a key difference is that Rose and Hughes do not react the same way towards democracy. In “Twelve Angry Men” the author does nothing about the problem while in “Democracy” the author demands for freedom for everybody.

In “Twelve Angry Men” Rose thinks that everybody/the jury should take democracy seriously, but not everybody/the juror’s does. Rose thinks that even juror’s during a murder trial can be affected by the attorney instead

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Casey Anthony Case

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages

    “Juries are not computers. They are composed of human beings who evaluate evidence differently. Casey Anthony was not found innocent of her daughter’s murder, as many commentators seem to believe. She was found “not guilty.” And therein lies much of the misunderstanding about the Anthony Verdict.…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reginald Rose uses the words of juror five to to teach his readers that staying silent can let you consider all sides of a situation, and that if you can be brave and change it ultimately can help you make a correct decision. Preview: In TAM Juror 5 shows his change in apprehensiveness to standing up for his opinion throughout the play. First, when he talks about his personal life very briefly. Second, when he changes his vote…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pathos In Juror 8

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As the play progresses, readers learn of Juror 11’s origin because he consistently comments on the principles of America and why he came to the Land of the Free. Futhermore, Juror 11’s interaction with Juror 5 on page 246 insinuates Juror 11 has faced mistreatment prior to his arrival to America. Audience members sympathize with Juror 11 due to his submissive personality, which is revealed through Rose’s syntactical expertise. With lines shorter than the other jurors, Juror 11 speaks when it is necessary: “I think it was eight o’clock. Not seven” (227), “Perhaps this is not the point” (231), “I would think about ten seconds, perhaps” (235), and “Perhaps if we could see it...…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reginald Rose uses reasonable doubt that is often portrayed in many real life juries mostly because of facts or opinions and consideration. In the play "Twelve Angry Men", Juror number Eight, is standing…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It’s a daunting place the courtroom, to think this is the same place that criminals get prosecuted, charged for committing murder, domestic violence, there all prosecuted here, so what does that make me? Am I nothing but a murderer or rapist. I walk into the courtroom, it’s airy, a layer of silence blankets the room, I walk pass Jase's mother, she stares me down, guilt rushes over my body. I know all too well what she thinks of me, and what Jase's situation would be like if I were just to come forward as that third man. I look over to the Lamb, he gives me a reassuring nod, he’s ready to take a bullet for me, go down with a prosecution that could set him back years, and leave a big black mark on his file, the jobs that he could miss out on his future in pieces.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many examples in the world that prove that the U.S. has a broken judicial system. To Kill A Mockingbird and 12 angry men convey this message very strongly. Tom Robinson’s case and the boy’s case are the examples in the story that show how the American Judicial system is broken. By comparing Tom Robinson and the boy’s unfortunate situations, similar jury’s , and opposite outcome we learn the American judicial system is truly broken and unreliable. Both Tom Robinson and The boy suffer from unfortunate sets of events.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his old age he is able to maintain quiet and observant disposition throughout the play which allows him to catch minor details which others may have overlooked. His observation of the old man witness demonstrates his own experience as an old man who has never been recognised until he was called to participate in a jury. This is affirmed when he says: “I think I know him better than anyone here. This is a quiet old man…newspapers. ”(Act…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Title Do think democracy is a good or bad thing? We’ll in this reading there is two different perspectives on democracy. The two authors that will be in this reading is Reginald Rose and Sara Holbrook, they have two different perspectives on democracy. What do you think about democracy ? Is it fair or not?…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Reflection

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The film “12 angry men” takes place in a courthouse in New York City. There is a trial going on involving a boy that is being charged for murdering his father. His sentence if guilty is the electric chair. The only thing that is deciding his fate, is the jury 's verdict. Guilty or non-guilty?…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In past times African American people were discriminated against and segregated, making a lot of people stand up for their rights in different ways. The speech written by Martin Luther King, “I have a dream” and the poem written by Langston Hughes, “Harlem”, both of them talk about the times of the brutality over African American people. The two works are similar because they both talk about African Americans not having the right of freely expressing their dissatisfaction with oppression. However, the two works are different in that one has a message with hope and the other one is without any optimism.…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A fundamental aspect of the American justice system is the right of every person accused of a crime, to a trial by jury. The defendant, presumed ‘innocent until proven guilty’, has the right to be judged by a group of his or her peers based on the evidence presented, the assumption being that the defendant will be judged in a fair and impartial manner. However, human beings are fallible and can be subject to faulty reasoning, alongside irrational and biased thinking. The play Twelve Angry Men, by Reginald Rose is set in a mid twentieth century American jury room. Twelve strangers, all male, are brought together to deliberate the facts of a seemingly straightforward case, a young man accused of murdering his father; their decision, which must be unanimous, will either take, or save a young mans life.…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Books and movies are like apples and oranges. They both are fruit, but taste completely different.” This is a quote by Stephen King. Whether or not Stephen King meant this quote as a comparison between a story made into a movie, that is the way I have interpreted it.…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Set in New York, 12 Angry Men follows twelve jurors as they decide whether or not a young 18-year-old Hispanic boy is guilty for stabbing his father in the chest. In a rather small room, the jurors must reach a unanimous decision, and if there is ‘reasonable doubt,’ the young boy will be freed. In one of the initial scenes, a vote is facilitated where 11 jurors find him guilty, and one juror, juror 8 votes that he is not guilty. He expresses to the group that a discussion needs to be made prior to sending a young boy to the death penalty. There is a lack of evidence which supports why the young 18-year-old boy stabbed his father and in turn leaves some of the minds of the jurors in a place where they are unable to convict within moral certainty.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Several of the jurors get up to see it better.)” (Rose 39). The actions of the jury demonstrate that although they might not care as much as they should for the boy since Juror #8 cares, they are willing to listen. Juror #8 argues the evidence given throughout the trial to prove not guilty with reasonable doubt. This sets both plays a part in the sense that John does not have supporting evidence to prove his ideas while Juror #8…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Groupthink In 12 Angry Men

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Society is remarkably quick to judge a situation without thoroughly investigating it. During the movie 12 Angry Men, the old saying that you cannot judge a book by its cover, truly comes to life. This movie shows and explains the process that the jury on each case go through. It shows how each juror goes through the process of determining whether the defendant is guilty or not. Throughout the duration of this paper, you will be provided definitions and examples of three ways that this movie relates to Communications 1010.…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays