Comparison Of The Federalists And The Republicans

Improved Essays
Both of the political parties, Federalist and Republicans, have many different opinions on how to run America. One of the differences is how each party views the Constitution. The Federalists interpret the Constitution loosely, while the Republicans interpreted it strictly. The Republicans view the Constitution very strictly, unlike the Democrats. Jefferson and Madison, the founders of the Republicans, believed in a strict interpretation. They thought the idea of a national bank wasn’t ‘absolutely necessary’, according to the Constitution. They accepted the idea of implied powers, but in a more limited way than the Democrats. They thought that those powers were ‘absolutely necessary’ for Congress to use their powers. However, the Democrats

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Republicans let the people help rule, but Federalists wanted a wealthy class to rule. Federalists didn't believe…

    • 214 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Soon after came to be two new ideas known as political parties which were the Federalist and Anti-Federalist. They fought from day one about everything including significant documents. Federalist and Anti-Federalist had many problems with each other which was known as the great debate. Stated in the new U.S. Constitution there isn’t security in the system for rights of people with ideas different than others or was their security for the liberty of the press (Document 2). The Legislative Branch which makes the laws that…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By the time John Adam’s presidency came to an end in 1800, two political parties surfaced with contradicting interpretations of the United States Constitution. The Democratic-Republicans had a strict interpretation of the Constitution, while Federalists had a loose interpretation. However, there beliefs were not always completely enforced by either party. In the election of 1800, Thomas Jefferson, a Democratic-Republican came to office. Although Democratic-Republicans presented themselves as “the guardians of agrarian purity, liberty, and states rights,” the occasionally shifted their beliefs if they thought it would benefit the United States.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the other hand, the Democratic-Republicans told about how uncentralized the United States would be if they were under the federal during Adams's presidency. Republicans' agreed that they wanted to expand of the U.S. army and navy, undertake on individual rights in the Alien and Sedition Acts, and new taxes and decrease the spending money used to support many of the federal actions that were being done. The main thing the Federalists wanted was a strong federal authority to prevent the extras of popular majorities, while the Democratic-Republicans wanted to take away majority of the national authority so that the people could rule more through state governments and let it be brought to one as a whole…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It is commonly claimed that the idea of Jeffersonian Republicanism was Anti-Federalist. The whole statement is completely accurate because Thomas Jefferson and James Madison alter their policies to coincide with the Federalists perspective. This is proven to be true as evident in the economic and government policies perspectives. The Jeffersonian Republicans placed their faith in the virtues of an agrarian democracy.…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Based on the chart on page 292 , it states that Federalists had a national bank with British Alliance and Republicans had state banks with French Alliance. Based on my tree map, I can see that Federalist's had federal government's ruled by a wealthy class…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Despite the lack of political segregation at the birth of the constitution, by conclusion of federalist John Adams’ presidency, two distinct parties emerged: the Jeffersonian Republicans and the Federalists. These political parties held opposing views on numerous topics including states’ rights, the power of the federal government, and most importantly, the interpretation of the Constitution. While both political parties signed to the laws written in the Constitution, the Jeffersonian Republicans are usually characterized as strict constructionists who were opposed to the broad constructionism of the Federalists. When the national government changed from the hold of the Federalists to the hold of the Jeffersonian Republicans during the Revolution…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dividing the parties almost completely in half were two groups with called the Federalists and Anti-Federalists. Anti-Federalists were more for a weak central government and more power to individual states, also their biggest argument was for a Bill of Rights. Now on the other hand the Federalists wanted a stronger central government and were against a Bill of Rights because they believed the government would give them rights. The Anti-Federalists main argument for a Bill of Rights was that there were certain rights that were guaranteed to people that the government should not infringe upon.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1787, the delegates to the Constitutional Convention meant to revise the Articles of Confederation. Instead they began a compromise to form a constitution. James Madison from Virginia proposed a plan that called for a three branch government: legislative, judicial, and executive. This was meant to separate the powers, assuring that not one group or individual could have too much authority. In this plan was also a system that allowed each branch to check the other.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was agreed upon in the Constitution that “Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed” (Jefferson). By stating this it was absolute that those who were in a position of power are there because the people they over-see. Some of the men behind the support for the Constitution were Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay. Although the Federalist strongly supported this change there were many disagreements from the Anti-Federalist group. The main argument came from those who believed this new Constitution would strengthen government at the expense of its people and independent states.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They believed that the general population could not be trusted with governing themselves, and that a strong political system must be created. One way they attempted to create a stronger government was through the creation of a National Bank, like that which England had. The Federalist Party believed that the creation of such a bank was constitutional, while their opponents believed that the general public should be in charge of a national bank. Regarding the creation of the bank and whether it was constitutional, Hamilton said, “Every power vested in a government is in its nature sovereign, and includes by force of the term a right to employ all the means requisite...to the attainment of the ends of such power” (Hamilton 3). Hamilton’s main argument was that the creation of a national bank was constitutional because of the 10th amendment, which allowed the creation of ways to achieve federal power provided they were through appropriate…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Federalists were the first group to control the government of the United States and the accomplishments of George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, and John Adams defined the party. On the other hand, distinguished men like Thomas Jefferson and James Madison fought to turn over the government into the hands of the Democratic-Republicans. The vast differences between the groups mentioned are direct…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Democratic-Republicans felt that there should be a strict interpretation, which meant that the Constitution should be followed word for word. Both parties also had different views on the government. “Therefore it was that the Constitution restrained them to the necessary means, that is to say, to those means without the grant of the power would be nugatory (useless)” (Document A). Thomas Jefferson’s strict interpretation is demonstrated in this statement.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fifty Federalists, with the same general idea of creating a stronger central government, all got together to draw up an entirely new charter, the modern day Constitution. Many debates occurred within the forming of this document, mainly revolving around slaves and specifications regarding the executive powers. The two main opposing members regarding the executive powers was Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson. Hamilton wanted a single man to be elected for life for executive power. The main argument against this was if one man was in charge, the government would be far too similar to a monarchy.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both these parties often have different views on how the country should be run and different outlooks on political issues. With these two parties there is still one that is rarely spoken of one of which is the Federalist. The Federalist are supporters of the United States government a U.S. political party founded in 1787 to advocate the establishment of a strong federal government and the adoption by the states of the Constitution. By the 1820’s most of the federal principles had been adopted by the Democratic Party and the Federalist Party was no…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays