Comparison Of Socrates, Aristotle, And Diogenes Of Sinope

Improved Essays
If Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, and Diogenes of Sinope all have come into our time zone especially in America and saw the lifestyle we are living, they would all have different opinions on the way things turned out. Some things are good and some are bad, but for sure they would all be shocked of the modern society just like anyone would be to see a new world in front of them. It’s like us going to a new planet or waking up a few thousand years from now and having the same mentality. I will start out with Socrates because I think he would be the most appreciative on how things turned out. Socrates life style would work out in the United States because of the way he chose to live. Starting with him not choosing to work even though he had …show more content…
The way our world is now with the new technology, we can grow fruits and vegetables in laboratories and people getting numerous plastic surgery to changes their appearance would make him very unhappy. I believe because of our advance resources of finding the truth would make him very happy. He would think that humankind has improved on being able to find the truth, but our world took a step back on how authentic it has …show more content…
He walked around with a lamp during the daytime looking for an honest man to talk to. Because of our amendments, Diogenes would not get into trouble for being himself. He would be upset of not being able to live of the land because of our modern society. Most of the forests and lands are privately owned, so it would be hard for him to be self-sufficient without trespassing and getting into trouble. He lived a simple life and believes in not owning anything, while sleeping in some kind of a round barrow. Diogenes would think humankind has improved since the ancient Greece because of the way our society is going. Less is more and people would rather lease homes, cars, boats…etc because of not wanting to be tight

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Although multiple novels were published by Sophocles there was much more than plays happening in the city-state Athens. Socrates a great and powerful mind was reaching the peak of his philosophical career as Pericles began to lead the Golden Age which would last from 500-300 B.C. They gave us monuments ideas innovations and more during that time. However Sophocles and Socrates minds differed quite radically. Those two brilliant minds brought us greek trauma drama and subtle cognitive indifferent philosophies.…

    • 79 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Euthyphro is appearing at the court because he is going to prosecute his father for the murder of one of his servants. 2. In the event of 4b-4e, Euthyphro and Socrates are discussing a case of Euthyphro’s father.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay I aim to present both the Cyclical and Recollection arguments proposed by Socrates in the Phaedo, to prove the immortality of the soul. I will discuss the criticisms of the first to demonstrate its fallibility as an account for the soul’s immortality. The weaknesses of the second argument will also be mentioned. In evaluating which of the arguments better proves the soul’s immortality, the responses to the criticisms of the Recollection theory will indicate why it holds as the prominent argument over the Cyclical.…

    • 1875 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Socrates

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Socrates believed that not everyone was wise enough to make their own political decisions as opposed to oligarchic rule where only the people of most expertise and expert would rule and make the decisions. Bringing out the weaknesses that the Athenian polis had in their democratic system of government was what had pushed bitterness and resentment towards Socrates which was a leading factor of his trial. Prior to the present democracy in Athenian society, the previous democrats of Athens had been put to exile by the oligarchs and they became infamously known as the ‘Thirty tyrants’. They were aristocrats who ruled Greece after the loss of the Peloponnesian war and were unpopular with the polis. Socrates introduces Chaerophon, a democrat who had asked the oracle if one was smarter than Socrates, and states that he aided in the exile of the Thirty tyrants: “Chaerophon… a good democrat who played his part with the rest of you in the recent expulsion and restoration” (21A).This represents how Socrates supported oligarchy where only the best people fit should…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One difficult thing that society continues to struggle with over the course of history is the idea of change. Individuals act as if through change, a post-apocalyptic society will occur, and all hope of growth will be eradicated. When people just accept what governs their lives without understanding how it affects them, it leads to an uneducated, close minded machine of cogs performing mundane things leveled on a plateau. Proper change to a society can be a prosperous move within a system. The Athenians had a routine for their education and beliefs, and they feared anything that could disrupt and halt the rhythm of their machine.…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates is being tried for three key reasons. Corruption of the youth, questioning the will of the gods, and undermining democracy. Socrates was a very well-known teacher among his Athenian students but he did not act properly when he was around them. He was also known for his religious beliefs and disrespect to the gods. Socrates would sometimes even question the social order of the government.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Galileo and Socrates both offer various methods of arriving at conclusions within their philosophies and studies, each articulating specific information to their followers as they advocate through either science or philosophy. Within the Republic, Socrates offers his stance on justice and its placement within a city run by philosophers through reasoning. However, within the Sidereal Messenger, Galileo offers his account of information through the scientific method, a method that uses facts to support his cause. These two approaches vary immensely, each contrasting in their approach to the justification of their work and therefore cannot be used interchangeably. As Galileo’s scientific method allowed him to concoct factual evidence surrounding his findings, this approach would naturally not enable Socrates to prove his ideologies as it is merely theoretical pondering, not evidence based conclusions that can be proved in reality, therefore the methods used by Galileo would not be feasible to test…

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    There were many contributions to modern day western civilization by the ancient Greeks. Their ideas and philosophies changed what we believe today. Here are the documents that prove these contributions to western civilization by the Greeks. There are many philosophers in the Greek civilization, two of them are Socrates and Aristotle, and they are both mentioned in the…

    • 59 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Greek philosopher Socrates once said "The unexamined life is not worth living." Without examining life, no change will ever come to people or cultures. Western Culture has developed over centuries, drawing on many archaic civilization’s qualities. Perhaps the most important influencer was that of Ancient Greece; a society that sought a balance, order, and harmony that people have emulated for thousands of years. The Greeks laid the foundations for Western Civilization with their formation of philosophy, history, democracy, and other elements that were the basis of current ideals still held to this day.…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To begin, Aristotle defines and contrasts both practical and theoretical wisdom. Practical wisdom is defined by Aristotle as being, “a truthful rational characteristic of acting in matters involving what is good for man” (Aristotle Ethics, pg. 154). In other words, practical wisdom is concerned with deciding what a good course of action for man is. On the other hand about theoretical wisdom, Aristotle writes, “a wise man must not only know what follows from fundamental principles, but he must also have true knowledge of the fundamental principles themselves. Accordingly, theoretical wisdom must comprise both intelligence and scientific knowledge”(Aristotle Ethics, pg. 156).…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Plato’s Gorgias, Socrates and Callicles engage in a debate about what it means to be happy and to live a flourishing life. According to Callicles, a person is happy and flourishing when he or she is living as ambitiously as he or she possibly can. Living the good life includes chasing one satisfaction after another and having a constant influx of pleasure. In contrast, Socrates emphasizes on the idea of eudaimonia, according to which a happy and flourishing person is one that lives an orderly life, in which the person maintains discipline and control over oneself.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arguments Against Socrates

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Socrates argument In the apology book Socrates have many accusers. Now he is accused of corrupting the youth but He is denying the allegations he is saying that he could not intentionally corrupt anyone. Some people are convinced that he is speaking the truth but some people thing that he is lying.…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates and Rene Descartes are alike in their most fundamental motives but yet contrasting in results both trying to improve thinking but about two different things. One example would be how they each convey their message formal versus informal, another would be their life style and beliefs of how things should be done. Both Socrates and Descartes have completely different views on getting their desired results, and the level of risk one is willing to take to accomplish certain results. Socrates and Descartes even had vastly different upbringing, and views on which sciences are important and others’ inferior to the rest.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Republic written by Plato, a dialogue between Socrates and several others is developed to illuminate a conversation concerning politics and life. His complex ideals prove his way of political thinking and democratic citizenship. Although many make an assumption that Socrates supports totalitarian principles, his values prove otherwise. Socrates demonstrates his beliefs by supporting education, encouraging society support, believing in gender equality, and understanding the diversity of skills offered by people. Only looking out for the best interest of people, Socrates proves himself to be radically democratic and to have contradicting ideas with totalitarianism.…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The dialogue begins with what is apparently a friendly and innocuous conversation between Socrates and Cephalus, in which Socrates asks Cephalus what he has learned from having lived a long life during which Cephalus has managed to acquire a certain amount of money. Socrates asks Cephalus whether age and theexperience of age have taught him anything, whether he misses the sexual appetites of his younger years, and whether the accrual of wealth may be said to be a good thing or a bad thing.…

    • 84 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays