Correlation Between Omnipotence And Existence

Superior Essays
I agree with Mackie when he says “evil is inconsistent with the existence of an all-caring all-knowing and all-powerful God. God cannot be omnipotent and omnibenevolent while evil exists. Those three premises don’t correlate with each other. If God is omnipotent and omnibenevolent then evil cannot exist. And If evil exist God can’t be both omnipotent and omnibenevolent. Just as Mackie said “evil inconsistent” with a good all powerful God. Evil should not exist given an all-good, all-powerful, and all-caring God.
In the first premises God is omnipotent. If God is all powerful there are no limits to what he can do. God can do whatever God wants to do, so even if evil does exist well there’s an all powerful God who can stop evil. Even if he allows
…show more content…
Free will equals freedom and freedom is what allows people to do what they please. God does not allow anything other than creative state of being which means freedom. Freedom is what leads to sin and consequently evil.Freedom also leads to growth and life it self. Free will allows for us to determine good from evil, without evil we wouldn’t know good. In the book of Genesis Adam and Eve were given instructions by God not to eat the forbidden fruit. God gave them the freedom to choose and because they disobeyed God, they were kicked out of the garden Eden. That’s where sin happen, the freedom is what allows evil to exist. If God didn’t give us free will there would be no evil. Free will equals the existence of …show more content…
Watching his creations suffer we he could help them with no sweat. All good and loving but watches those he love become victims of other people’s evil actions. He watches people suffer. What kind of omnibenevolent God allows this to happen? When you love someone you do anything in your power to protect and keep them safe. But it seems like the omnibenevolent God doesn't abide by these things that are associated with love. If God is omnibenevolent he's not omnipotent because evil exists. Since evil happens everyday, everywhere around the world. We hear about some, not all. God must not be as all-good, all-knowing, and all-loving as others assume. Not when evil goes on right in front of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the logical problem of evil, it is made aware that three things must be true in the contemporary version layout for evil to exist. They are that God is all good, He is all…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Where there is good evil is always present, however our God is greater than all evil, He is…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    We as humans make bad choices when it comes to their freedom. This ends in evil and humans making evil choices. God gives us all free will and that is why we should not use them inappropriately. Our free will is freedom that we use to out weigh evil. However God allows us as humans to act freely so we can be morally responsible since we are freely capable of doing well.…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Problem of Evil In Evil and Omnipotence J.L Mackie argues that if there is a God who is all-powerful and all good than he would not have allowed there to be any evil in this world, or if there was any evil to begin with he would have eliminated it, but sense there is evil than God must not exist. If you think about how and what Mackie is arguing then it makes sense, that God must not exist if he would let us be tormented by evil on a daily biases, but this argument is only valid to the people who think God is both omnipotent and wholly good. Which few traditional Theist will say that God is not omnipotent or wholly good, but if you can than the problem of evil will not arise for you. Mackie also gives us a few fallacious solutions such as “Good cannot exist without evil” or “Evil is a necessary as a counterpart to good”.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mackie Free Will

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages

    From the moment man stepped foot on the porous soil of earth, an inner-voice began to awaken from within the confines of cerebral tissue; a compelling force that enables man to chose between both what is right, and that which is not. Is it a higher power, or the complex mechanics of evolution that is to blame for the establishment of this subconscious observer? Did the creative force bestowing mankind with such a powerful tool know the extent to which it would be used? As impossible as these questions appear to answer, it is evident that this concealed power is a seemingly inherent motivating influence in human decision-making. For the sake of argument and the purpose of this paper, this intuitive metaphysical force will be regarded as free-will,…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reason that we even have an experience of perceived evil is because of the experience itself that .we have been through, meaning that; we can’t have “hot” without “cold” So I understand that what we believe is evil is just the opposite end of the of good. I am often confronted with the argument saying that evil shouldn’t exist if God really existed. The “problem of evil” means that the existence of evil is a needed condition for the existence of certain kinds of good things. There are a number of characteristics that are important only if evil exists in this world. Being compassionate, for instance, is a great value, but can only exist if there is suffering in this world.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “God” is defined here as omnipotent and omnibenevolent. This is the definition of God that theists tend to use. The first premise of the Problem of Evil argument is that if God does exist, then God is omnipotent. This premise is just stating the theistic definition of God. The second premise of the argument is that if God is omnipotent,…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The problem of evil suggests that if an omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent God exists, then evil does not. However, there is evil in the world. This problem is similar to the problem of error as they both question the perfection of God. The traditional answer to the problem of evil is that evil is a result of the misuse of that freedom of will, and God values free will over stopping evil. Descartes uses a similar explanation to solve the Problem of Error.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An important topic within metaphysical philosophy is theodicy, which works to justify the existence of God even though evil exists. John Hick and Steven Cahn in their respective works, “The Problem of Evil” and “The Problem of Good”, provide valid arguments for the existence and probable non existence of God in the presence of good and evil. Through the reversal of Hick’s argument, I feel that Cahn establishes the illogic behind Hick’s view and proves that because both good and bad will always exist within the world, based on Hick’s reasoning and premises, it is likely that soul making and God do not exist to serve the greater good. In order for one to truly understand Hick’s missteps in logic, first you must understand what he is trying…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Arguments From Evil: Elliot Sober I. Introduction The reality of evil existing in our world has been questioned throughout time based on the argument that an all powerful, all knowing, and all good (all-PKG) God cannot coexist with evil. The problem of evil only appears when there is a PKG God because if God is all powerful, all knowing, and all good then how could there still be evil. Therefore, if one of those properties we removed then there would no longer be a problem because then God couldn 't prevent evil from happening.…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    God is absolutely possible of torturing an innocent baby for fun. He is a free being so he has the ability to choose right from wrong, when makes this being so omnipotent and perfectly morally good is that He always chooses right. This is hard for a lot of people to comprehend, but being entirely perfect and capable of anything logical can be overwhelming for many people. My objection states that people, and God has choices and that is what makes him comparable to our human population, but the difference is his perfection compared to average human…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Augustine And Evil

    • 1966 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Epicurus was one of the first philosophers to consider the problem of evil and his question; “if He is both willing and able (to take away all evils), which alone is suitable to God, from what source then are evils? Or why does He not remove them?” , summarises concisely the issue which has been at the forefront of philosophical argument for thousands of years. To explore this question I will first consider what God is. In this essay I will refer to God in the orthodox monotheistic sense of the word as an omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent being. Likewise, evil refers to all that is bad in the world.…

    • 1966 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Evil exists because we chose it to. We, as free agents can choose between right and wrong. Through this we can justify our actions. What kind of world would we lead if everything was already decided for us and all we would have to do is perform it? God, although knows how we will choose, plays absolutely no role in our process of choosing.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Freewill Argument

    • 2367 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Introduction In this paper, I will break apart J. L. Mackie’s stern defense of the logical problem of evil, which he uses to suggest the God does not exist. I will attempt to defend the notion that both God and evil, in the form of human creation, can exist in the world by way of suggesting that freewill is the answer. Furthermore, I will strengthen the argument for freewill against Mackie’s defense, which suggests that the argument of freewill also compromises the Omni-three nature of God. In part, I will back freewill by using Mackie’s own logic against him.…

    • 2367 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Pseudo-Dionysius-The Areopagite, one of the most influential and inspiring theologians and philosophers of our world today. The birth and death dates of Pseudo-Dionysius are unknown, but was considered to be between the late fifth century to the early sixth century. Most of Pseudo-Dionysius’ writings are presumably lost but, what was recovered of his work are of the most famous and well known in the Christian community and a great framework for philosophers and theologians. Among his great work and best known for is his writings on The Divine Names, Mystical Theology and Ecclesiastical Hierarchy. Pseudo-Dionysius was believed to be influenced by Maximus the Confessor.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays