Introduction
Grabber: Benjamin Franklin was one of the most successful yet audacious men to live in all of American history. Neutral Bridge: Although Franklin used a kite to observe electricity, there was a period during his life where he felt pleasure in arguing with people due to the fact that he prioritized contradicting people in conversations. Specific Bridge: Freud’s Last Session written by Mark St. Germain revolves around the conversation between a Christian named C.S. Lewis and an atheist named Sigmund Freud. Both individuals attempt to understand each other by asking critical questions and delving into each other’s mindset. Thesis: By conversing and wrestling with each other’s divergent worldviews, both Lewis and Freud are effective in assembling powerful and fragile arguments.
Support Paragraph #1: Lewis’ Strongest and Weakest Argument, Scrutiny Topic Sentence: Individuals can have the tendency to present an unsteady argument even if they make logical arguments in their conversations. Claim: …show more content…
Recap Clincher #1: Ultimately, Lewis rationally defends Christianity, but he mistakenly sees evil being advantageous. Recap Clincher #2: Overall, Freud analyzes the hypocrisy with Aquinas’ worldview, but he is ignorant of the connection between science and religion. Refer back to grabber: In the midst of their strengths and weaknesses, Lewis and Freud do a commendable job of engaging in a conversation with one another and symbolize what an ideal conversation between contrasting worldviews should look like. Conversations between differing worldviews should be an opportunity for all individuals involved to be listened to and have a chance to express their opinions. All in all, these individuals should also learn about the different worldviews and what life is like for
Grabber: Benjamin Franklin was one of the most successful yet audacious men to live in all of American history. Neutral Bridge: Although Franklin used a kite to observe electricity, there was a period during his life where he felt pleasure in arguing with people due to the fact that he prioritized contradicting people in conversations. Specific Bridge: Freud’s Last Session written by Mark St. Germain revolves around the conversation between a Christian named C.S. Lewis and an atheist named Sigmund Freud. Both individuals attempt to understand each other by asking critical questions and delving into each other’s mindset. Thesis: By conversing and wrestling with each other’s divergent worldviews, both Lewis and Freud are effective in assembling powerful and fragile arguments.
Support Paragraph #1: Lewis’ Strongest and Weakest Argument, Scrutiny Topic Sentence: Individuals can have the tendency to present an unsteady argument even if they make logical arguments in their conversations. Claim: …show more content…
Recap Clincher #1: Ultimately, Lewis rationally defends Christianity, but he mistakenly sees evil being advantageous. Recap Clincher #2: Overall, Freud analyzes the hypocrisy with Aquinas’ worldview, but he is ignorant of the connection between science and religion. Refer back to grabber: In the midst of their strengths and weaknesses, Lewis and Freud do a commendable job of engaging in a conversation with one another and symbolize what an ideal conversation between contrasting worldviews should look like. Conversations between differing worldviews should be an opportunity for all individuals involved to be listened to and have a chance to express their opinions. All in all, these individuals should also learn about the different worldviews and what life is like for