Ethical Relativism Definition

Improved Essays
Ethical Relativism and Moral Disagreement
Moral disagreement does not gives us reason to believe that ethical relativism is the correct metaethical theory. I defend this position by arguing that ethical relativism has several discrepancies and contradictions that undermined the idea that individuals, or societies define what morality is, based solely upon preference. The main downfalls of ethical relativism are that it makes moral mistakes “incapable” of happening, all morals are equal, you can never be unsure of yourself or your society, there can never be positive moral change, and there is an inability to allow true moral disagreement to exist.
Ethical revivalism can be broken down into two parts, there is cultural relativism and ethical
…show more content…
If all moral beliefs are correct, and none rank above the other, wouldn’t that mean that moral beliefs, that would normally oppose each other, fall on the same level of morality? Effectively it is saying that the moral beliefs of the Hitler regime were just as “good” as Gandhi leading the Indian independence movement. This moral equality would eventually breed intolerance of moral beliefs amongst individuals and cultures. If ethical relativism is the correct metaethical theory, them theoretically you are saying that it is morally permissible to enslave human beings and immoral to enslave people. However both of the moral truth are not acceptable, and they will fight for …show more content…
Because ethical relativism is completely based on personal feelings it does not really make moral claims, instead it tells people their preference for something. An example of this is the statement: “child abuse is wrong”, but ethical relativism says this means “I disapprove of child abuse”. Instead of making a clear statement on what is immoral, it just states opinions. Ethical relativism boils moral claims down to statements that sound like “I prefer crunchy peanut butter over creamy peanut butter”. With moral claims based in ethical relativism you get moral truths that are both right and wrong and contradict each other. You can end up with one of two results, either you have no moral claims, or no moral disagreement. Relativist dismiss the idea of moral disagreements, even though it is the main selling point of ethical relativism. I believe that moral disagreements exist and in order to have a moral debate one must be able to make a moral claim based upon more than an opinion, however I do recognize that moral disagreements are not as wide spread as we think. I believe that many of our moral debates can be rooted in similar values, we simply have different ways of expressing

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Final Paper Assignment My purpose in this essay is to explain why I believe that morality is objective versus moral relativism, which ethical theory do I ratify and the reasons behind why I do, and express how I would respond to a stranger’s objection to that specific ethical theory. Theory of Morality, also known as theory of the right, is concerned with identifying fundamental moral norms, rules, or principles in which actions are evaluated and may be deemed as right or wrong. In other words, this is explaining what you ought or ought not to do. Moral relativism is to say that there are no moral truths.…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If individuals had no moral values, everyone would be running around without a care in the world and solely worried about themselves. There would be no awareness for anybody or anything so we would turn into selfish human beings. Ethical relativism is “the doctrine that the moral rightness and wrongness of actions vary from society to society and that there are no absolute universal moral standards binding on all men at all times” (Pojman, 14). There are some moral values worldwide that are just adopted overtime and for that I will support Louis Pojman and what he states about ethical relativism being an incoherent theory, how it is much bigger than just individuals or even societies. I strive to hit on conventionalism and subjectivism, which have their up sides but ultimately diminish Pojman’s argument on ethical relativism.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1a. Cultural relativism is the view that no culture is superior to any other culture when comparing systems of morality, law, politics, etc. (AllAboutPhilosophy.org, n.d.) It does not offer a universal right and wrong, but rather offers the notion of morals based on the cultural environment. This diverges from the traditional ethical theories of doing what is right and adopts the ethical theories that are the “lay of the land” as they relate to the local culture in which the dilemma takes place.…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    So, I took this into another way of thinking. If you think about in today’s world you have Osama Bin Laden who was a leader of horrific terroristic acts. Now a moral realism looks at this sentence and thinks that this is true he is a horrible person who did horrific acts. A moral relativism’s way of thinking would be that these are opinions and he neither is or isn’t a horrible person because of the opinion factor. Now, I am not saying that a moral relativism person agrees with anything he did but just as a basic understanding.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The article, “Hands Off Clitoridectomy” by Yael Tamir, discusses the controversial topic of clitoridectomy, and all the arguments within the subject while opening up a new way of perceiving it by comparing it to our own society and practices. She suggest that indeed the practice of clioridectomy is a gruesome and gutwrenching, but there is more to the subject than just the moral issues of it. She address the political and social aspects of performing and living with the procedure and addresses them with passive but firm arguments. Her main point of the article is that our society needs to stop judging and creating prejudices aimed at other cultures or societies when in fact we could be bettering our own society rather than critiquing others.…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical relativism is the view that “some moral rules really are correct, and that these determine which moral claims are true and which false.”…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Relativism And Culture

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Different cultures have different moral codes”, James Rachels discusses in his article Why Morality Is Not Relative? (160). Moral codes differ from culture to culture and each culture tends to have their own individual standards. Cultural relativism is said to be “moral rules differ from society to society” (18). Cultural relativism can be looked at as a theory based on nature of morality. Each culture has their own moral codes, typically created by their ancestors.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Relativism can be subjective, which is the view that an action is morally right if one approves of it or it can be cultural, the view that an action is right if one’s culture approves of it. As long as a person has approval for an action it will be considered the right action for them to make. Not every relativist is going to have morally correct beliefs because what seems right to one person may seem wrong to another. For example, some cultures believe that there is nothing wrong with committing crimes such as murder, rape, stealing because this is what is accepted and seen as normal in their culture. When looking at criterion 1 of moral criteria of adequacy, this theory appears to be inconsistent with considered judgments because what one person approves of can be seen as immorally incorrect.…

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If Metaethics never existed there would be no deeper meaning to morality itself. Metaethics is a branch of philosophy that analyzes moral values and focuses on the question “what is morality itself is?” (Pacillo-Dellino). Metaethics which is also referred to as “Second Order” has four basic stanzas that are called Four Basic Stanzas of Metaethics. The four basic stanzas of Metaethics are Absolutism, Objectivism, Cultural and Subjective Relativism, and Emotivism.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cultural relativism may be defined as a theory that advocates the idea of subjective morality. To extrapolate, this theory entails that “different cultures have differing moral codes” and these variances are merely arbitrary. Although this is a seemingly sufficient theory, there are key issues with this school of thought. James Rachels suggests several issues with accepting cultural relativism. He criticizes cultural relativism by stating that the theory is absurd as it entails severe consequences if practiced.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral Relativism Essay

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Although this concept isn’t great for our society, it has a greater success outcome compared to absolutism. In Mary Midgley’s article, she discusses the issues with moral relativism. She claims that although moral relativism doesn’t have the greatest outcome, it is a way to view different cultures. Every culture does something based on their religion and or…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Who decides what is moral and what is not? In my opinion this way of looking at morality is no better than relativism because there 's no room for exceptions even though sometimes they need to be made in a…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Folkways, William Graham Sumner claimed that morality is actually just a reflection of the mores. He further argued that since morality came from the typical culture groups, it should be only bounded within the group but not universally. The thesis Sumner raised in his argument, aka, ethical relativism, had been challenged by many objections. In this essay, I will provide one objection of ethical relativism and argue that even Sumner attempted to address the objection; his thesis is still fallacious due to begging the question. One critical objection to ethical relativism is the absurd objection.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Accessed 25 Sept. 2017. “no particular moral or ethical position can actually be considered “right” or “wrong.” http://www.allaboutphilosophy.org/cultural-relativism.htm Velasquez, Manuel, et al. “Ethical Relativism.” Markkula Center for Applied Ethics, www.scu.edu/ethics/ethics-resources/ethical-decision-making/ethical-relativism/. Accessed 25 Sept. 2017 ”whether an action is right or wrong depends on the moral norms of the society in which it is” practiced”https://www.scu.edu/ethics/ethics-resources/ethical-decision-making/ethical-relativism/ “Cultural Relativism.” AllAboutPhilosophy.org, www.allaboutphilosophy.org/cultural-relativism.htm.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Therefore, moral truth is relative and varies from culture to culture. Further on, he justifies why the cultural relativism argument is invalid, and why cultural relativism (if it were true) is an unacceptable form of morality. Finally, he makes concessions to acknowledge some valuable learning points of cultural relativism. In this essay, I argue the flaws in his conclusions and maintains that although it is important for objective truths to exist, cultural relativism may still be a best explanation for some extreme cases of disagreements that we observe today.…

    • 1886 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays

Related Topics