Comparison Of 1984 And Starship Troopers

Improved Essays
George Orwell, author of 1984, and Robert A. Heinlein, author of Starship Troopers, both harshly criticize modern society in their dystopic science fiction novels: either by exaggerating fatal flaws or amplifying the triumphs of mankind. Even though both books present similar ideas about humanity, they portray them with very different attitudes. Orwell takes a depressing fear-inspiring approach whereas Heinlein motivates the reader to see the best of humanity.
George Orwell uses Winston Smith’s rebellion against the Party to represent self-sacrifice for the good of society. He sacrifices his personal safety by committing thought-crime, reading “Goldstein’s Book”, loving Julia, and rejecting the Party’s lies. At the meeting in O’Brien’s house,
…show more content…
Heinlein demonstrates individual sacrifice for the greater good multiple times throughout Starship Troopers. Johnny Rico demonstrated this quality when he jumped into the bug-hole after his comrades:” I looked at the third hole, the one that had swallowed up my platoon sergeant and half my platoon…then I jumped” (252). The moment he jumps he is not thinking of himself, but rather of his fellow soldiers. This exemplifies the root answer to what it means to sacrifice for the greater good. Many other officers in Starship Troopers also sacrifice their lives to protect their platoons. Sacrifice allows people to “climb the moral ladder” (Brault). Heinlein respects and praises individuals who put others needs ahead of their own and illustrates this by rewarding characters for self-sacrifice for the whole of …show more content…
People show compassion towards others. The best example of this in Starship Troopers is when Johnny explains the biggest shortcoming and simultaneously the greatest strength of humanity. Major Reid asked Johnny what limit of prisoners it takes to start a war, to which Johnny replied, “It doesn’t matter if it’s a thousand--or just one, sir. You fight”(178). The willingness to sacrifice, show emotion, and fight for what they believe in makes them human. Empathy and compassion for others is uniquely a human quality. Johnny uses this to justify the war, killing the pseudo-arachnids to save humans. Because they do not show any regard for their fellow soldiers, the pseudo-arachnids are not human. Human’s care whether they live or die, the pseudo-arachnids do

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    George Orwell’s novel, 1984, and Thomas C. Foster’s novel, How To Read Literature Like A Professor, have several comparisons. Winston Smith, thirty-nine year old worker for the Ministry of Truth, is stuck in a totalitarian environment that he strongly disagrees with. However it is wise for him to keep his feelings to himself because “Big Brother is always watching.” 1984 relates widely to chapter thirteen, It’s All Political , of How To Read Literature Like A Professor. 1984 is a novel with a deeper political meaning behind it.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Amser Dialectical Journal

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages

    People like that sergeant and Moeller do what they do because they are soldiers, but the rest do what they do because they are thugs who delight in inflicting pain. I am well aware this is not a game; it’s dangerous and people will die. But for as long as I’m here, I can’t stand by and let children suffer. It doesn’t matter whether they are Dutch, German -- or Jewish. If I can help even one then -- I will do it.”…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Humanness is defined in the Oxford Dictionary as “a characteristic of people...especially in being susceptible to weakness.” The book The Things They Carried by Tim O’Brien highlights humanness through the portrayal of the Vietnam war through the experiences of separate soldiers. The excerpt this paper begins with a description of a man who had been killed by a hand grenade in eerie detail. O’Brien’s use of adjectives and nouns makes the story seem poetic and personal, making the passage deeply moving for the reader. The imagery used to describe the body forces the reader to visualize the dead man and internalize the weight of human life.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People perceive soldiers as strong, brave and young heroic men who march in parades, win glorious battles, bring enemies to their knees and ironically promote peace and democracy to the world. These men are ready to put their lives on the line and fight and defend their country at whatever cost. Cowardice is far from the mind of mere individuals when the word “soldier” is mentioned. However, when Tim O’Brien allows his readers to get a glimpse into the lives of these men whom we gaze upon with great revere, crippling fear and paranoia gnaws at the mind of these men as they trudge through the battlefields. The main reason for war is a contradiction in itself; a gruesome fight which results in the death of many and and the main goal is to restore…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reasons that are thrown at potential soldiers to participate in a war are essentially ruses that has them ignoring major and obvious risks of participation. Author Tim O’Brien’s negative attitude towards the war is further developed by the traumatizing effect that war has on soldiers. The gruesome appearance of the soldier heavily influenced his attitude and was essentially the cause of it. The fear of death caused a death, which inevitably caused more…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both Lang and Orwell realize that all power to overrun the totalitarian regimes of their times and their fictional futuristic landscapes lies in the hands of the masses. However, while Lang has hope and represents that there is still hope in the masses Orwell believes that the dehumanization of the individual is too much that the masses have become unthinking and all hope is lost. “The Party taught” the Paroles that they “grew up in the gutters” and gave them little knowledge on political matters that “even when they became discontented, as they sometimes did, their discontent led nowhere, because being without general ideas, they could only focus it on petty specific grievances. The larger evils invariably escaped their notice.” On the other hand, Lang represents how the masses can work together to bring together a…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In wars, many humans often lose their humanity because of the fact that they lost someone close to them. People in time of desperations listen to their emotions more than reasoning which can cause them to do an action that goes against their own morals. Most People would go against their own beliefs and loyalties because they’re afraid to die. After the war, many people face challenges that affect their life substantially. War dehumanizes many people with traumas, from killing others to save themselves, and from the feelings that leave people with ultimate despair.…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The soldiers all succumb to the darkness of man’s heart. The common soldiers sacrifice everything they have in war, and in return are granted nothing but painful deaths. The men must choose between humanity and survival. Ultimately, survival always triumphs due to the animalistic transition made in the chaos of…

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I have this sense of righteousness is possible through the appropriate gestures. Being a product of two military parents, I easily comprehend the sacrifice one makes to their country,…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As I look up at the soldiers only a few feet away from me, I men whom I cannot forgive for the death of my enemies. The love shared between my dead comrades is something that cannot be forgotten. Yet these are soldiers don’t seem like they kill for no reason, and I know nothing about them, or their pain. But I hesitate to ask. Even if I understand them now, that doesn’t change my feeling towards them.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Orwell’s ‘1984’ convinced me, rightly or wrongly, that Marxism was only a quantum leap away from tyranny. By contrast, Huxley’s ‘Brave New World’ suggested that the totalitarian systems of the future might be subservient and ingratiating.” (J.G. Ballard) Ballard was a known novelist on creating notable science fiction associating with apocalyptic-dystopian settings. J.G. Ballard is familiar with other acknowledged narratives relating to his realm of literacy. He recognized and distinguished Brave New World and 1984 as pieces of literature as equals against one another.…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    War stories are gruesome. They capture the reality of war--death, grief, and pain. “The Sniper” and “Where Have You Gone, Charming Billy?” (by Liam O’Flaherty and Tim O’Brien respectively) are both shining examples of this; unpacking the glorification of victory to reveal how humans are dehumanized and trained to kill other people. Their differences outline a common theme: how war dehumanizes people from killing and guilt, and how that all builds into a catastrophe later on in life.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Human Rather Than a Character The first thing that comes to mind while thinking about a soldier is a man wearing clean uniform with glittering gold badges. This man is courageous, fearless; he can run through mud while it’s raining, go into dark tunnels without having any fear. From this hypothetical soldier’s face, it can be understood that he is proud of serving his country and protecting the weak. This man who would do anything to save his compatriots, fights dauntlessly in the war zone, when all he can think about is his beloved wife and kids.…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    George Orwell 1984 George Orwell, in the novel 1984 present a terrible philosophy about the future. The read becomes one entirely convincing as his narration becomes timely as ever. With a startling vision of the world, it holds a convincing tone from the very first to the last part. Everyone in the novel is incomplete despotism and under control and repress of the ‘Big Brother’ and the party. it represents hierarchical system of both parties.…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Such raw emotion says a lot about the vulnerability of humans, despite how they were trained to fight. Even though Corporal Himmelstoss promises to “make you soldiers, make you tough,”, no amount of training can prepare a person for the mental scarring that comes with participating in a…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays