Free-Will Vs Determinism

Good Essays
When discussing the humane contrast between Free Will and Determinism, Free Will is the side I support. My argument is the concept that all natural occurrences can’t always be explained, but they “just happen”. Even though scientific facts contradict Free Will, a balance of the two beliefs is very possible and is controversial in modern conversation. All human beings contain Free Will in any scenario or situation they encounter; Although this is different for each individual and their beliefs. First we must define the term Free Will; Free Will is the doctrine that the conduct of human beings expresses personal choice and is not simply determined by physical or divine forces ("The Definition Of Free Will"). Which means that every occurrence …show more content…
For example, the authors state that empirical findings have confirmed that gratitude is influenced by perceived motivational sincerity (MacKenzie, Vohs and Baumeister). The statement describes that Free Will enthusiasts can find gratitude due to their perception of situations, therefore creating their idea of a positive outcome. This further supports my idea that Free Will has become more worried modernly because individuals do not have the proper sense of imagination to obtain positive feelings of gratitude or ease within scenarios. My personal view of Free Will is contributive. I strongly support Free Will because it allows the mind 's capabilities to expand over varieties of topics, and how no exact thought can be wrong because with Free Will there is no precise cause to an issue. I also encourage those who are unsure of what side to accept to pick the Free Will side. My reasoning is first, that Free Will does not determine cause from scientific facts. When investigating too deep into scientific evidence, information can get overly complex which makes you question whether this information is true, without an exact source. Secondly, the basis of Free Will depends on that individual 's perspective of what is considered a “valid fact” or “cause”. This perception is different for all, because the whole concept of Free Will revolves around the idea that occurrences aren’t controlled by …show more content…
This is due to the explanations as to why anything within the world can have a determined cause. According to Edwin Locke, To deny the possibility that man can have knowledge, however, is a self-contradiction (Locke and Boyd). This quote describes that without knowledge and Determinism, we are unable to determine causes for the phenomena that occur throughout human life. He continues a point that without any existent knowledge, no determinists can provide valid statements because no knowledge can support the statement, therefore concluding it as invalid. With the accumulation of knowledge, modernly we are capable of expressing intelligible reasoning to situations that appear as “unknown/undetermined”. Flaws found in the Free Will argument can include approaching an undetermined situation with scientific bias, providing a scientific insight which makes the final conclusion somewhat determined by the scientific perspective of that being. Also, the idea that things naturally occur without cause can create implication because of the uncertainty of facts you provide to validate your conclusion, which makes individual perspective an unreliable source to provide causation. A method to resolve problems in the Free Will argument is as mentioned previously, to consider yourself as a Compatibilist. This is a flexible belief that complies with Determinists and Free Will because it

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Moreover, they believe freedom requires indeterminism. Lastly, Compatibilism or soft determinism believes that that all actions have a cause and that free will is compatible with determinism. Compatibilists according to scientist believe that freedom can be present or absent in situations for other reasons and has nothing to do with the logics behind it. Ultimately, free will exist despite the help from…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    All these ideas seem be based on loose speculation that don’t have much merit in terms of the bigger picture. Proponents of the Libertarian view on free will would argue that free will is independent of agents of causation therefore, actions are based only on whether the individual desires to complete the action. At its core, Libertarianism rejects determinism and focuses on ideas that concern themselves with liberal independence. I would respond by stating that, actions need foundations from which they are based on. Human nature checks free will by allowing for a reason for actions being chosen and executed.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It is different with libertarianism as determinism believes that we were already determined by certain causes outside of the power of will, while libertarianism believes in the theory that we are truly free in our choices. They also disagree on the idea of responsibility; determinist does not believe we can be responsible when we have no free will, while libertarians think differently. Although determinism and libertarianism have little to none in common, compatibilism can bring them together. The way that free will is compatible with determinism is called compatibilism. Although compatibilism and libertarianism are similar, they can also be quite different.…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Whereas, libertarian is opposite to hard determinism and called indeterminism. Libertarians resolve the conflict between free will and determinism by rejecting determinism. For libertarians, science is great to the extent it goes, however it will never succeed in totally predicting human behaviour (121-122). Libertarians says that we have souls, non-physical sources of consciousness, which makes choices that are not controlled by laws of nature. According to libertarian past occasions have no immediate effect on current good choice making.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Essay On Indeterminism

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Nothing in our lives is predetermined and every cause has an effect. Human actions are caused, but we can consider actions free if they are the result of internal motivations rather than external events, a belief known as soft determinism. Some philosophers like Baron d’Holbach, would define free will as indeterminism. Indeterminism is the view that human actions are not necessarily determined by past events and causal laws. It reflects heavily on the belief that freedom is possible.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    D’Holbach is on the Materialist side of the spectrum, whereas I fall on the Dualist side and therefore I can not agree with the view that human life is reduced to the physical brain and not the free soul. The problem with d’Holbach’s viewpoint on free will is that if there is no freedom of choice or free will, then there would be no meaning in our lives. Humanity would be diminished to existing as automatic machines subjected under the orders of external factors. But, humans do have a certain amount of freedom in the Compatibilist concept of free will. In d’Holbach’s concept of free will, all is condensed to the physical brain and subject only to external influences rather than a soul, and consciousness.…

    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Freedom of the will, according to Frankfurt, is compatible with determinism; however, his inability to refute the possibility that second order desires may be predetermined allows for the conclusion that all humans truly do not possess freedom of the will and are only under the illusion that they do. In order to fully understand free will, it is important to define it. Free will is determined as the ability to choose between many options and act upon the choice chosen.…

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Freedom Vs Determinism

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages

    If you wanted to argue about indeterminism which is that everything we do is random but still lacks freedom of will. These types of arguments go back to ancient times and are still being argued to this day. Psychologists who agree with free will view believe that determinism removes freedom and devalues our lives.Deterministic psychology doesn’t understand the amazing qualities of human beings and our freedom to choose our own…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When we hear the word “will”, first thing which arises in our mind is my choice. In our society, humans are involved by freedom but all the laws and rules have limited are freedom to a level. Tough not much freedom in many things but we do have freewill. Many philosophers have claimed that we should do what we actually want to do, which means that we should obey our freewill. In contrast, Sam Harris objected about the real concept of freewill.…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Free Will Problem

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It is both fascinating and disturbing to examine the problem of free will. As intelligent beings, we ironically want nothing more than to nod our heads aggressively in agreement to the concept. However when one digs deeper into what free will is and what it does or does not imply, it’s inevitable that we are nodding not because the factors of it are logical and non-contrary, but because we refuse to accept the rattling notion that our lives are, essentially not our own to govern So what exactly is free will? Moreover, why is it a problem? Free will is a concept that is defined in philosophical terms as ‘the ability to do otherwise,’ meaning that one is not governed by anything other than oneself at that very moment.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays