Comparing The Supreme Court And Judicial Power Of The United States

Decent Essays
The Supreme Court stands the official judicial power of the United States. It is the supreme courts job to decide what the law is. If two laws conflict with each other it is the court’s decision to decide on whether one applies rather than the other. The Supreme Court’s job is to “translate” the constitution and then follow it. Not to alter the meaning at all. It is also their job to keep the president and congress in check so no unconstitutional things happen under their watch. The judicial power of the United States as aforesaid before belongs to the Supreme Court, and that judicial power extends to all cases under the constitution. It says in Article Three section two of the constitution, “ The judicial power shall extend to all cases,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    First, the Supreme Court needs to be able to decided whether laws are constitutional or not, because we need a part of the government to do that specific job. The Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution states that the “Constitution, … , shall be the supreme law of the land” (Doc. G), and it is the basis that our government and country were based upon. No law should able to violate the Constitution therefore we need someone to decide what is constitutional and what isn’t. No legislative act or law can go against the Constitution, and if it does it is not a legitimate law (Doc. C).…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    14th Amendment Advantages

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As analyzed in Dynamic Constitution, the reality of the Supreme Court is that it simply finds the law and applies it, without the justices allowing their own views to come into play (Fallon). “The 1st amendment’s equal protection…

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Madison Supreme Court case, Chief Justice John Marshall’s majority decision revolutionized the interpretation of Section 1 according, Section 2 of Article 3 in the US Constitution. Marshall first stated in his speech that “it is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.” This reveals that Marshall believes the Supreme Court’s duty or job is to determine what the law is. He then says that “if two laws conflict with each other, the courts must decide on the operation of each… if a law be in opposition to the Constitution...…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Roe v. Wade The United States is governed by laws that are suppose to protect the rights of all Americans. The people that interpret these laws are the nine black robed officials more commonly known as the United States Supreme Court. This selected group of officials are responsible for many of the upheld and newly developed laws that they have decided are constitutional. One of the many examples of the United States Supreme Court rulings is the case of Jane Roe going up against the Dallas attorney Henry B. Wade.…

    • 1294 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some of their duties are, deciding if laws agree with the Constitution, interpreting how laws should be…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    he Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court within the hierarchy of the country’s federal courts. The Court was established in accordance to Article III of the United States Constitution. The Supreme Court consists of nine total members, all of whom are nominated by the President at the time, and approved by the Senate. All nine members of the Supreme Court serve their term for life, only leaving when they retire, resign, or are impeached.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First, due to its power of judicial review, it plays an essential role in ensuring that each branch of government recognizes the limits of its own power. Secondly, the high court protects the civil rights and liberties of the common American by striking down laws that violate the Constitution. The final major role of the Supreme Court is to appropriately monitor our government in such a way that popular majorities may not harm or take advantage of unpopular minorities. For most of our history, the Supreme Court selection process was characterized by its insularity.…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court has made a lot of important decisions that impact the lives of United States citizens every day. If I would have to summarize what I have learned from the United States Government class in very few words, it would have to be that the justice system was built to be fair and just for everyone and that the government structure was framed to be as effective as it can be. Even though history has shown more than once that the system can be exploited and government corrupt, like any system and governing body can, it still comes to show that it is effective and was put in place with the people in mind. There was a point in time where the two collided and one of the more important rulings of the Supreme Court has been made. I am talking…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Within the United States Constitution, there are a number of rules and laws that have been outlined and are left for interpretation by the judicial branch of the U.S. government. These interpretations can be taken for exactly what they say, which would be known as a strict interpretation. On the other hand, these laws can be taken and manipulated in order to apply them in a number of different ways; this would be considered a loose interpretation of the Constitution. The Supreme Court is charged with the task of interpreting the laws set forth within the United States Constitution and applying them to court cases as they see fit. One case in particular that was crucial in the formation of the United States Supreme Court was that of Marbury…

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Duel Court System

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Duel Justice Watkins, Robert GCU Duel Justice The United States of America utilizes a duel court system in its judicial system. The two courts systems are federal and state. Courts that exist at the state or local level are established by the individual state, and exist “within states there are also local courts that are established by cities, counties, and other municipalities, which we are including in the general discussion of state courts.” Courts that exist at the Federal level have been established under the United States Constitution and rule on disputes concerning the Constitution and laws that are passed by Congress.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judicial Dbq Analysis

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Although a majority of documents convey the impression, to be against the Supreme Court having the power to question the constitutionality of federal laws; but the amount of documents that agree, have more solid evidence in their argument. The Supreme Court should have the power to overturn unconstitutional federal laws. Federalist No. 78, the Marbury v. Madison decision, Article III of the Constitution and the Judiciary Act of 1789 are prime examples to prove that the judicial branch has the authority to do so. First of all, in Federalist No. 78, written by Alexander Hamilton in 1788; declares that, “[The] courts were designed to be an intermediate body between the people and the legislature...”(Doc D).…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    J. Cecelia Shaulis April 13, 2015 Pols-Y 211 Dalecki Exam 3- Miranda v. Arizona One of the biggest players in law interpretation and policy-making is the judiciary system. While the other two branches of government have some control over the judiciary system through checks and balances, the federal courts have a great deal of power in the form of judicial review. Judicial review is the authority of the Supreme Court to interpret the Constitution.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Their main responsibilities are to interpret the laws Congress passes and ensures they are in accordance with the Constitution. Their job is to hold courts to review all executive actions and laws within their jurisdiction. A recent report of the judicial branch ruling would be updates to a 2014 Court Rule that would shorten the sentences for 26,000 inmates. An independent agency of the federal judicial branch, the U.S. Sentencing Commission, re-assessed the 2014 ruling that changed the drug sentencing guidelines. They retroactively applied the ruling to inmates that where already convicted and sentenced, resulting in shorter prison time for these personnel (2014 Rule Shortens Sentences for 26,000 Inmates, 2016).…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nicolas Winters Group #5 Paper 2 What powers do the Constitution give the Judicial Branch? A world without the Judicial Branch of government is a world without set rules. In 1787, the Constitution had created the Judicial Branch, under Article 2 Section 2, to deal with all of the new laws that could be set in place. The Judicial Branch also leads the Supreme Court, the highest court of law in the United States. The Judicial Branch of government receives powers backed up by the U.S. Constitution, has a very strict and complex system to become a supreme court judge, and the U.S. Supreme Court Justices should interpret the Constitution by how it was originally wrote.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court Power

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Supreme Court has a lot of power in determining the constitutionality of the law and whether not laws are unconstitutional. Although the Supreme Court’s power is extremely important to the system of checks and balance, it is also important that the justices do not have too much power. Judicial activism is when the justices of the Supreme Court make decisions based off of their personal opinions and beliefs and public opinion and they change policy, whereas judicial restraint is making decisions based off of the constitution and the law without any regard of public opinion or personal beliefs and only determining the constitutionality of a law without changing policy . In certain cases it is better to use judicial activism, especially in…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays