Comparing Socialism And Communism In The United States

Improved Essays
We have looked now at both socialism and capitalism and how they differ. There are not many similarities between the two except maybe that they both want to run a society in an efficient manner. They just have very different ways of going about it.
For a socialist movement to take root in an otherwise capitalistic society the following would have to occur. To make the people want a different system, more mandates, regulation, and taxes are implemented, making it more difficult and nearly impossible for private parties to have ownership of private property or operate businesses without adhering to government commands. Through regulation and more taxes, the middle class becomes smaller and smaller creating a larger class gap. When there is a
…show more content…
This group of people are commonly referred to as the working class. These are the people that socialist groups would target to convince them that socialism would be a better system to live under. When people are no longer happy with their standard of living they will look for something better. That is when the idea of socialism will be put in front of them. They will be promised prosperity, equality, and good fortune for all, if this new ideology is implemented. The smaller upper class would be shown as a greedy group of individuals that do not care about the sufferings of the rest of the population. They care more about themselves and their pocketbook than the human suffering of the rest of the population, would become the common cry of those who are living without.
Each person must come to their own conclusion of where they stand on the issue of socialism and capitalism. However, if a person studies history he or she will come to the conclusion that socialism does not work and has never worked. Margret Thatcher said it best, “The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money” (“A Quote”). When people realize that they can still get the same thing without working for it, they simply quit working. Why

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    My revision is to elaborate on the economic system portion of my review and to add additional information. In this week's assignment, I selected to address the Ledbetter vs. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company case, where Lilly Ledbetter filed discrimination for gender pay. Capitalism and socialism both serve as a crucial part of the economic system for this setting. Some of the characteristics of capitalism are better working conditions, better wages, the profit motive, competition, and greed. In reference to the socialist theory which is practically the opposite and is not motivated by personal self-interest.…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    With the social injustice the lower class’s had little to no say so, the upper class held all the power, the upper class had all the power due to having money and connections with powerful people in the business world. With this shift of power…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Amanda Wilson Professor Leightenheimer English 1102-01 23 October 2017 Role and Pathos: How Eugene Debs Creates Relatability Crafting and reciting a speech can be an incredibly difficult requirement. The main difference between these and, for example, an essay, is that enunciation and delivery can make or break a speech. With this addition also comes extra importance on understanding and reading the responses of your audience to gauge effectiveness. Speeches need to have a form of an emotional pull to them, or else they sort of inadvertently transition to lectures rather than a form of persuasion. Actions can still be carried out in more logically oriented speeches, but that passion to push someone could be lost.…

    • 1682 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Timothy Vs Gatto Analysis

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In reality, true socialism is designed to eliminate corruption, not lay the groundwork for future totalitarian control. In fact, its ideas are far more integrated into modern America than the public is led to…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These bourgeoisie trust that the best society is the general public in which they have power; they need the working class to keep its feeble part, however to quit despising the prevailing bourgeoisie. A second type of this sort of Socialism perceives the way that lone changes in financial relations could help the low class. Nonetheless, the upholders of this sort of communism don 't acknowledge that such changes essentially involve an obliteration of the relations of creation. Or maybe, they wish to make managerial changes, which basically diminish the expense and measure of regulatory work for the common…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Due to this lack of representation in the mainstream political spectrum, most Americans are ignorant to how a modern socialist system would operate in today's age. In modern day America socialism is more often than not cast in a decidedly dark overtone. This is most easily contributable to various dictator’s habits of justifying their…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even if almost all the power is owned by the government in socialist countries, author David Schweickart states that production in service to the whole group, equitable distribution of wealth and the lack of social classes are important elements that build social justice in socialist communities (http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:xCQW2IDMFgMJ:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_democracy+David+Schweickart&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us) .In other words, the only way social justice can be achieved is to eliminate the establishment of classes and the promotion of equality for all people, which is a goal of socialism. By contrast, the existence of economic classes in capitalistic society, such as high class, middle class, and low class, as well as private ownership of property, constitute inequality, exploitation, and misery (“Democratic Socialism”).…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    People are divided into the have and have nots in these class struggles, but to change the status of every citizen wouldn’t change their feelings of material things. Abolishing private property…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For socialism to be effective the citizens would all have to possess an unrealistic drive of selflessness and gracious in sharing. The lack of incentive toward citizens would cause widespread negligence in work quality. The government in a position that is too susceptible to correction and negative influences. The economy will have a more difficult time prospering or will be almost non-existent. The Cons of socialism are too heavy and the system has a poor track…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socialism evolved from abusive Capitalism through the idea that many workers were treated horribly during the start of Capitalism, therefore, causing people to adopt the socialist idea. From the idea of Socialism, sparked the idea called Utilitarianism; this idea wanted “greater happiness for the greatest number” and supported the idea of individual freedom. The socialist idea valued that their were not any ownership instead the workers of the building owned the building. Workers in Socialism would go on to own entire farms, railways, and other businesses and supporters of Socialism believed in the basic goodness of people.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    ‘Socialism’ is a transitory stage between capitalism and communism. The ultimate aim of a socialist state is the formation of a communist society. The primary difference between socialism and communism is that the former is a dictatorship of the ‘proletariat’ while the latter is a classless society. Hence, there is a state, a political party and a controlled economy in a socialist state whereas a communist state is one where the state completely ‘withers away’ and a classless society is…

    • 2903 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Capitalism is the most common economic system in the world today. Capitalism is an economic system in which a country’s industry and trade are controlled by private owners, not the government. Capitalism is superior to socialism because there is freedom to do business to individuals, allows private ownership, and Free market is allowed. In a capitalistic society, anyone can start a business and make decisions and earn profits from that business.…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Instead, the new ruling class, the proletariat, when in control, will abolish the ownership of private property and the classes will disappear (Marx & Engels, 1848). Marx and Engels (1848) state the resulting conflict and revolution can be solved through the adoption of Communism, whereby there are no class distinctions in the society. In the second preamble; ‘Proletarians and Communists’, Marx and Engels explores the relationship between the communism and the working class. They state that the Communism would be organized in favor of the proletariat and focus on their interests rather than those of a specific class (Marx & Engels, 1848). They expound on the characteristics of the Communist…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Karl Marx explains social inequalities through a society being stratified along economic lines and social class being defined solely on economic position. According to Marx, a person’s economic position is their relationship to means of production, which defines social class. Based on an industrial society, he defined social class by two classes; the capitalist class (Bourgeoisie) and the working class (Proletariat). Marx felt strongly against capitalism and believed that everyone should have a communistic society, which would have no surpluses so only what is needed by the people would be produced.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During feudalism there was multiple levels of social stratification. However, under the burgeoning new system, capitalism, there was only two social, and economic groups – the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. Marx summed…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays