This diversion could be a criticism by Rintaro on Fritz Lang’s portrayal of the mechanical man’s identity, caused by the enormous differences between both films. Rintaro’s version of Metropolis has numerous alike factors to Lang’s, however, varies from its primary proposition substantially. For instance, this contrast is that intrigued and spirited robotic woman unknowing of her genuine nature takes the place of the hostile and sinful robot made by Rotwang in Lang’s Metropolis. At the time the woman learns of her robotic features however, she starts to question herself, actions, thoughts, and her total existence. The people of Rintaro’s Metropolis, like those of countless science fiction films have an extremely skewed and pessimistic outlook on …show more content…
It does a greater task of portraying this concept of ‘Robot Identity’ that has been urged throughout the past twenty years of science fiction. The focal point is on why the mechanical child is scorned and disdained for being machine-driven. Additionally, similar to the characters represented in Rintaro’s Metropolis, Spielberg illustrates a world where a substantial of the lower class population have been affected by Lang’s concept of inborn hostile robots. The second part of the film makes this extremely obvious, where the leading mechanical character discovers themselves, caught in a live game show, directed to a working class demographic. The onlookers of the show share an exceedingly alike response to the people of Rintaro’s Metropolis, hoping for the robots to be demolished and holding the mechanicals responsible for removing their employment and destroying their lives. It is not Steven Spielberg, but instead the characters he has established convinced by Lang’s stereotypical, hostile murderer automation evidently that share this