Comparing Rousseau And Thomas Hobbes

Improved Essays
Human nature is defined as the general psychological characteristics, feelings, and behavioral traits of humankind, regarded as shared by all humans. Both philosophers, Jean Rousseau and Thomas Hobbes discuss about human nature in their writing although they both have different perspectives. Rousseau claims that humans weren’t originally evil, no unequal wealth or inequality, people went through many phases before reaching that stage in their development. However, Hobbes thinks otherwise, he argues that our human nature is being evil or being in a constant war with each other meaning we need a common power to control us. Hobbes has the correct view on human nature because people are fighting each other constantly and afraid of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Napoleon was a child of the Enlightenment. He favored the French Revolution and was a fiery Jacobin. The Jacobins drew their political thought from Enlightenment thinkers, most particularly from Rousseau. Rousseau blamed much evil in the world on the uneven distribution of property in his book, Discourse on the Origin of Inequality. He also believed society was more important than its individual members believing that individuals alone could do very little, but through involvement in a larger political community, were capable of significant action.…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Human nature is core characteristics like feelings and behaviors that all humans share, but experience them through different perspectives. Early American authors like Thomas Jefferson, Olaudah Equiano, and Jonathan Edwards use rhetorical strategies to help convey their views on human nature in their writings throughout history. Equiano and Edwards have similar views, believing humans are naturally born evil. However, Jefferson believes in equality. These authors have different ways of conveying their message through figurative language, imagery, connotative diction, and parallelism to show their contrasting views on human nature.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    What is Human Nature? According to Google, “Human Nature is the general psychological characteristics, feelings, and behavioral traits of humankind, regarded as shared by all humans.” Are we really changing as a human being? Or are we still the same and learning how to do the same thing in different way? No matter how adventure the world is, we as a human beings cannot change.…

    • 222 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rousseau’s Confessions and Frederick Douglass The Narrative Life of Frederick Douglas, An American Slave are both autobiographies that give us an inside look to personal thoughts and emotions they felt at different times of their life. Having written one hundred years apart certainly helps us understand and address the ways in which each writes about themselves and their life. Rousseau and Douglass lived completely different lives that heavily influenced their unique writing style and shaped the way their autobiographies were written. Rousseau’s Confessions is recognized as the first autobiography written in the era of the Enlightenment.…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Starting off, they each had a distinctive understanding of human nature from one another. To Rousseau, humans in primitive times were "noble savages" and it is "civilization" that turned man into a "beast". Conversely, Hobbes believed that being "civilized" is a positive trait and being uncivilized or a "savage" is bad. Concerning human nature, Rousseau theorized that humans were innately good and generous, before being corrupted by the vices of civilization. Human life was most likely peaceful and compassionate as described in his opening line, “Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains.”…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Most people take for granted many things we are afforded in this day and age. One of those things we take for granted is the government. Without said government there would be no laws to provide order and security, and we would be in a state of nature that would result in a state of war. A state of nature, regardless of who is detailing its differences, is basically a life without government rule leaving people to act out of self-preservation. A place without government is a place of chaos with everyone acting of their own accord.…

    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction ‘During and after the English Revolution (1642-88), different English thinkers reacted differently toward the revolution, based on their own life experience and philosophical outlook’. Thomas Hobbes and John Locke strongly argued distinct notions of political power. One absolute kinship, the other a democratic republic. In this essay it will firstly state and discuss the relation between state and sovereign according to Thomas Hobbes. In doing so Thomas Hobbes ideas will then be compared to John Locke’s.…

    • 2054 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Every person has their own political theory, whether they realize it or not. In a sense, a political theory is our ideas on how government and society should work. As a person becomes more educated and reads the works of other political and philosophical writers, the political theory expands. My political theory is a combination of not only my own opinions, but the ideas originally created by theorists such as John Locke and John Stuart Mill. Human nature is the beginning of any great political theory.…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    John Locke and Jean-Jacque Rousseau present themselves as very distinct philosophers. They both use similar terms, such as, the State of Nature, but conceptualize them differently. In my paper, I will argue that Locke’s argument on his proposed state of nature and civil society is more realistic in our working society than Rousseau’s theory. At the core of their theories, Locke and Rousseau both agree that we all begin in a State of Nature in that everyone should be “equal one amongst another without subordination or subjection,” in which we are free with no government or laws to guide one’s behavior.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Monique Wilder Professor David Hill SSP 101.7920 July 15, 2015 Midterm 1) Explain the main differences and similarities between the ideas of Hobbes and Locke’s. Similarities include: rights, state of nature, atheism, powers of a sovereign, and the idea that governments are beneficial. John Locke and Thomas Hobbes are two social contract theorist who share similarities in their Social Contract Theories, however they both have differences. The social contract theory is a voluntary agreement among individuals by which organized society is brought into being and invested with the right to secure mutual protection and welfare or to regulate the relations among its members.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes Vs. Rousseau

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Hobbes argues that men are innately selfish, while Rousseau believes that humans are naturally good beings. Rousseau argues that the “nature” presented by Hobbes is in fact “unnatural.” Hobbes argues that man is evil, that government is needed in order to protect the public, that the government should be all-powerful, and that power should not be shared. In contrast, Rousseau argues that man is good and that society is the reason that man has been misbehaving, that the government’s purpose is to protect the social contract, that the government should be able to be overthrown, and that power should be shared and direct. The main divergence in these two educated philosophers theories is the fact that Hobbes believes that society is needed in order to prevent mankind from a “human nature” that is beastly and savage, while Rousseau argues that human nature is inherently good, however when man come together in society, they corrupt…

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Both Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Karl Marx share the political and economical ideology that private property separates society into classes, and creates oppression. However, the two view property in different regards. Rousseau views property in a more political view, while Marx focuses more on the economic sphere of property and society. This paper will first state Rousseau and his critique of property, inequality, and the emergence of society found in The Discourses. Then, it will contrast the political critique of Rousseau with that of Karl Marx’s economic critique regarding property, and include other critical parts of Marx’s work including the Jewish Question and the Communist Manifesto.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Many people specifically philosophers would question, “Why we need a state?” or “What kind of state should we have?” This question opened up all the different views and perspective of the three following philosophers, Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau. They all have different but also very similar views on the state of nature, social contract, laws. Hobbes definition of state of nature is a state of war. Morality doesn’t exists and everyone lives in constant fear.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rousseau criticizes the state of nature described by Hobbes; instead of a constant state of fear, Rousseau described it as equality and happiness. Through the passage of time, the state of nature started to disappear as small communities formed, here man started to make comparisons to one another as class divisions developed. For Rousseau private property was a drastic change because communities went away from a simple state to one that consisted of greed and rivalry. Disapproving of Hobbes, who argued that people surrendered rights to an overall “ruler”, Rousseau believed people surrendered their rights to each other, in other words the community. For Rousseau, modern civilization took away the good parts of the early societies and replaced it with a society revolved around the state.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Human nature is a theory that’s been a debated for centuries upon centuries. Philosophers have argued the concept for as long humans have been on this earth. Perhaps none the wiser than Plato, Socrates and Aristotle .The seemingly underlying truth is that there are characteristics; thinking, acting, feeling. That we all experience consciously or sub-consciously that make humans do the things that they do.…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays