• Home Page
  • Comparing Rawl's Social Contract Theory And Ethical Relativism

Comparing Rawl's Social Contract Theory And Ethical Relativism

Improved Essays
Show More
The theories of Ethics have to do with how Ethics in and of itself can be measured. This is to say that an act can be seen as ethical to one person, but unethical to another. Because of this, certain beliefs are classified into groups to help one better understand his/her ethical standpoint. These groups to which one may associate with are Ethical Fundamentalism, Utilitarianism, Kantian
Ethics. Rawl’s Social Contract Theory and Ethical Relativism.
Of these choices, the ethical standpoint I support the most is that of Ethical Fundamentalism, this ethical theory bases its principles on an outside source of authority. This outside source may vary from a religious book of some sort, to a particular leader one has chosen to follow. Some argue
that

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    John Rawls Principles Of Justice Vs Utilitarianism
    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages

    John Rawls Principles Of Justice Vs Utilitarianism

    Principles of Justice vs. Utlitarianism Justice is a social concept that is used as an assessment tool in various social institutions such as government, courts, economic systems and education. John Rawls proposed two principles of justice that will help govern in the creation of social and political practices that are fair to all (p. 52): • Rawls’ first principle of justice states that “each person is to have an equal right to the most extensive scheme of equal basic liberties compatible with a similar scheme of liberties for others (p. 53).” • The second principle: “social and economic inequalities are to be arranged so that they are both a) reasonably expected to be everyone’s advantage, and b) attached to positions and offices open to all”.…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Utilitarianism, Kantian Ethics, And Moral Theories
    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Utilitarianism, Kantian Ethics, And Moral Theories

    There are six evaluative principles that are used to evaluate moral theories. They are Consistency, Applicability, Publicity, Internal Support, External Support, and Explanatory Power. I am going to evaluate Divine Command Theory, Utilitarianism, Kantian Ethics, and Virtue Ethics using these six evaluative principles. First is Divine Command Theory (DCT). For Consistency, DCT is consistent because God either commands an act to be either right, wrong, or it is permissible if God has not claimed if it is right or wrong.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Comparing Mill And Utilitarianism
    • 1339 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Comparing Mill And Utilitarianism

    People have long tried to interpret ethics in societies. Who, how, and why ethics was created are common debates among philosophers. In its simplest form, ethics can be described as how a differentiates between right and wrong. Whether that be due to society’s standards or their own, there are many theories to explain this daily-occurring phenomenon. Kantianism, the divine command theory, existentialism, ethical relativism, the virtue theory, and utilitarianism are the more widely known theories to describe how ethics came to be what we know today.…

    • 1339 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical Dilemmas In Child Care Research Paper
    • 1986 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Ethical Dilemmas In Child Care Research Paper

    Individuals hold distinct values and often conclude their interpretation of the world is true and right. It is this complex fusion of values and beliefs that lead to ethical dilemmas. Newman and Pollnitz (2005, page 108) describe ethics as what we perceive to be the right course of action, what we…

    • 1986 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Act Consequentialism: The Most Plausible Moral Theory
    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Act Consequentialism: The Most Plausible Moral Theory

    Many people have justifications for why they do certain things. Some justifications are based off of happiness, desires, god or morals. People who use happiness and desires as their justification use theories of the good. While those who use god and morals use theories of morality. Some theories that fall into the theories of morality are the divine command theory, consequentialism, and social contract theory.…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle, John Stuart Mill, And Immanuel Kant
    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Aristotle, John Stuart Mill, And Immanuel Kant

    The three ethical theories were made by three famous philosophers Aristotle, John Stuart Mill, and Immanuel Kant. These three philosophers are arguably the most famous philosophers in the branch of normative ethics. Normative ethics deals with the moral standards that regulate our actions and categorize them as whether they’re right or wrong. The theories of ethics consist of Aristotle's Virtue Ethics, Mill's Utilitarianism, and Kant's Deontological Ethics. I believe that Aristotle’s theory is closer to the truth than the others.…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    My Belief On Ultimate Reality
    • 1315 Words
    • 5 Pages

    My Belief On Ultimate Reality

    What is your basis of ethics? My bias of ethic is knowing what is right and what is wrong. What I believe is right might be wrong to others because people make excuses and support their verdicts and not differentiating ethics. For instance, I consider people who lie have no principles and they should be honest with themselves in order, to be honest with others.…

    • 1315 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Peter Singer Speciesism
    • 1782 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Peter Singer Speciesism

    Morals are the standards of what is good and what is evil or what is right and wrong. Moral values govern the behaviour, decisions and feelings of an individual. When determining wether it is morally acceptable to experiment on animals, such views as Peter Singer’s speciesism, Rene Descartes’ Cartesian theory and Immanuel Kant’s Kantian ethics can be used to examine both sides of this question. Speciesism proposes that experimenters indicate a failure to give equal consideration to the interests of all beings, irrespective of species, concluding that in a speciesism view, experimenting on animals is not morally acceptable, the Cartesian view explains that animals are not conscious and therefore have no interests or well being that must be taken…

    • 1782 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Adrift In A Moral Sea Analysis
    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Adrift In A Moral Sea Analysis

    Adrift in a Moral Sea Life often throws people some difficult challenges where there ends up being more than one right course of action. Everyone has their own different morals that they have acquired through out their life and this helps them decide which ethical perspective that they believe in. One instance, of where you can look at multiple ethical perspectives to solve a problem comes from the essay “Lifeboat Ethics” by Garrett Harden, which is about being shipwrecked in the middle of the ocean and having to choose who you want to let on the boat. There are 50 people who are on the boat and there is room for only 10 more people, while there are 100 people who are stranded in the water outside of the boat. There are various theories…

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Research Paper On John Dewey
    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Research Paper On John Dewey

    John McVea main position is the meaning of ethics, which he defined as, “...not about proving what is good or right; rather, ethics is a way of living that enables enlightened conduct” (John McVea 89). He views ethics from a pragmatist standpoint; such as John Dewey. A pragmatist is a person who is guided by practical considerations than by ideals. John Dewey is guided by ethics being a way of living.…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Compare John Rawl's Deontological Approach To Social Justice
    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Compare John Rawl's Deontological Approach To Social Justice

    Although both John Rawls and Martha Nussbaum are considered respected philosophers, their approaches to the theory of social justice differ immensely. In this paper, I will demonstrate the flaws and strong points of their approaches to social justice and determine which is more persuasive. More specifically, I will analyze Rawls’s social contract type approach to Nussbaum’s proposed “Capabilities Approach” and directly apply them to the issue of people with disabilities. Lastly, I intend to present a personal opinion on these two theories of social justice based on my ethical framework.…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Immanuel Kant's Categorical Analysis
    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Immanuel Kant's Categorical Analysis

    For some time, ethics have always been a concern in the world. The notions of right and wrong, good and evil, have always been contemplated; with every person individually devising their own unique idea of what they believe is moral. Morality in the world generally gravitates towards virtue, while hatred and evil are looked down upon. However, there are those that believe that goodness is not simply acts of kindness, nor is it innately there in humans to begin with. Eighteenth century German philosopher Immanuel Kant solidified his thoughts on morality, and created a step-by-step, systematic plan for the human being to follow in order to achieve goodness.…

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Compare And Contrast Ethical Egoism And Kant's Theory Of Good Will
    • 1310 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Ethical Egoism And Kant's Theory Of Good Will

    According to the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy “The field of ethics (or moral philosophy) involves systematizing, defending, and recommending concepts of right and wrong behavior,” (Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy). We have learned throughout this class that ethics is a moral value that differs from person to person but what makes up ethics? Ethical theories are a huge part of ethics; however, many of the theories differ in more than one way. In this essay two theories will be focused on and outlined, those theories being, ethical egoism and Kant’s theory of good will. In the outline regarding these theories I will cover the strengths of both theories, what type of dilemmas the theories can cover and lastly there will be some criticism…

    • 1310 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Comparing John Rawls And John Stuart Mill's Theory Of Justice
    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Comparing John Rawls And John Stuart Mill's Theory Of Justice

    In Rawls’ Theory of Justice, he thinks of Justice as Fairness. Rawls’ thinks the distribution or redistribution of goods is fair, in my opinion, this would depend upon the situation. It’s also stated in Justice as Fairness that “Justice should not be based on Luck of Birth”. Another exert in his text states that the “Veil of Ignorance guarantees that justice will be achieved by the least well-off”. Although some of the things Rawl’s speaks of in his Theory of Justice could possibly be achieved, I beg to differ.…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Advantages Of Ethical Pluralism Over Ethical Absolutism
    • 223 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Advantages Of Ethical Pluralism Over Ethical Absolutism

    Ethical pluralism over ethical absolutism and ethical relativism has its advantages. We live in a society that believes in law and order, order is a sense that we follow laws set in place to guide us as citizens to make the right decision or face consequences for our actions on our own ethical standards. When I look at ethical absolutism, I see a way of order in that regardless of your culture or the country you live in there is only one true ethical way to do things which sums up the term absolutism. Ethical relativism is what is morally right or wrong from person to person or culture to culture that when judged should be judged based on their culture. Ethical pluralism gives us fours ways in which we may be judged this principle of understanding,…

    • 223 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings